The question I have is what is the down side of a large miner pool acting as a block to seg witness and NOT allowing it to activate due
to not reaching the 95% threshold
The miner group in question has all the advantages of the previous NO seg witness method of 0.13.0.....
things just chug along as usual. Bitcoin core is 'stymied'. That group wins in that some compromise has to be given by bitcoin core or Seg witness threshold of 95% is never reached or no seg witness thus no lightning thus no solution
stalemate
![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
Thus your group of miners or all big china, miners in general, retain the power with this veto..they get the block size increase and things go along as usual
win/win/win
So what am I missing...besides the obvious pissing off bitcoin core and a nuclear 'fork' of bitcoin ..which I don't think they would do...bitcoin core that is...
just seems like stalemate imho as seg witness is set up for 95%
do the poll you can see where I'm gonna vote on this