Paying 0.002 BTC, for each related topic and a summary of 100 words

[onemd]

Article: http://www.whyfuture.com/single-post/2016/11/06/The-Blueprints-towards-the-Development-of-Good-Artificial-Intelligence
Topics in the article: Bad Teacher Influence, Ethical Paradox, The Psychopathic AI vs. the Non-Psychopathic AI, The Topology position View, The One Dimensional Perception Vs Multidimensional Perception

I am paying 0.002 BTC to each person that submits an topic related to the article above, and with a summary of 100 words describing that topic.

Terms:

- Come up with your own topic, and a summary of 100 words that relate to the discussion of the article. Discusses ethics, morality, paradox, and about AI.
- The summary/topic must be related to the title & and the article (AI ethics to consider)
- Read over the article to get an idea for what I am looking for
- Must be 100 words or more for the summary
- Unique content, no plagiarism like copying/pasting
 

[4738man]

Well, there are bad teachers and then there are bad people who are teachers, so I am not certain of which you are asking about.  But being the thorough teacher that I am, I will try to at least cover some of the issues with each.
 
The first group I will call poor teachers (well there are not a lot of rich teachers LOL) but I mean poorly skilled teachers.  These are teachers who are poor communicators or people who have not fully mastered their subject area's material.  They may frustrate their students when they cannot clearly explain things, or provide more than one example.  They may get frustrated with their students when they don't learn something the first time it is taught.  And sometimes they may just not teach their students all that much which will lead to lower achievement and possibly even a lack of desire to learn the subject any further.  Often these are young teachers who are learning the craft, and sometimes these are teachers who have burned out and are just hanging on until they can retire.  These are people who the whole process of tenure should weed out and it is why in the profession we need administrators who were actually classroom teachers.  Teachers with poor skills need to be taught to do better or shown the door.  Three years is plenty of time to correct this or sort them out and send them on to another career.
 
The second group of "bad teachers" are bad people.  They would be a cancer no matter what career path they followed, but finding them in the classroom is the most troubling place they could be.  Teachers like this are miserable in their jobs (for whatever reason) and this has an adverse effect on their students that lasts well beyond the time they have the student in their class.  They can turn their students off from becoming educated and that is a harm that can last a lifetime.  They are people who are there collecting a paycheck rather than building people who can succeed in the world.  When someone like this makes it into the classroom it is important that their inadequacies are thoroughly documented so that through due process they can be removed so they do no further harm to their students. (Again it gets back to good administrators doing their jobs

13ei2jrEZZEruc1WXu9J4o7BiyTtty7Qb7

[onemd]

Well, there are bad teachers and then there are bad people who are teachers, so I am not certain of which you are asking about.  But being the thorough teacher that I am, I will try to at least cover some of the issues with each.
 
The first group I will call poor teachers (well there are not a lot of rich teachers LOL) but I mean poorly skilled teachers.  These are teachers who are poor communicators or people who have not fully mastered their subject area's material.  They may frustrate their students when they cannot clearly explain things, or provide more than one example.  They may get frustrated with their students when they don't learn something the first time it is taught.  And sometimes they may just not teach their students all that much which will lead to lower achievement and possibly even a lack of desire to learn the subject any further.  Often these are young teachers who are learning the craft, and sometimes these are teachers who have burned out and are just hanging on until they can retire.  These are people who the whole process of tenure should weed out and it is why in the profession we need administrators who were actually classroom teachers.  Teachers with poor skills need to be taught to do better or shown the door.  Three years is plenty of time to correct this or sort them out and send them on to another career.
 
The second group of "bad teachers" are bad people.  They would be a cancer no matter what career path they followed, but finding them in the classroom is the most troubling place they could be.  Teachers like this are miserable in their jobs (for whatever reason) and this has an adverse effect on their students that lasts well beyond the time they have the student in their class.  They can turn their students off from becoming educated and that is a harm that can last a lifetime.  They are people who are there collecting a paycheck rather than building people who can succeed in the world.  When someone like this makes it into the classroom it is important that their inadequacies are thoroughly documented so that through due process they can be removed so they do no further harm to their students. (Again it gets back to good administrators doing their jobs

13ei2jrEZZEruc1WXu9J4o7BiyTtty7Qb7

Not even related in the slightest, please read the section in the article

Bad Teacher Influence
 
A blueprint to consider is, learning AI can be harmed from bad teachers, for example Microsoft Tay of traits of prejudice, racist, unjustness, etc. Was a learned characteristic. What we need is a guard against bad teachers.
 
Microsoft AI Tay had bad teachers that distorted and worsen the outcome of Tay, feeding a self-protection network against bad teachers with the intent of swaying the AI towards the negative direction. Having its own internal ethical compass aligned towards the positive direction is the key.

An closed system is something to consider, where the AI is taught first. Built with an inner-web of positive attributes first and an internal defense against bad information. Taught to know what's right from wrong. Taught to reject bad teachers, and to filter out the bad information. Tay outcome is not what humanity needs.

[illusioNiZt]

Well, there are bad teachers and then there are bad people who are teachers, so I am not certain of which you are asking about.  But being the thorough teacher that I am, I will try to at least cover some of the issues with each.
 
The first group I will call poor teachers (well there are not a lot of rich teachers LOL) but I mean poorly skilled teachers.  These are teachers who are poor communicators or people who have not fully mastered their subject area's material.  They may frustrate their students when they cannot clearly explain things, or provide more than one example.  They may get frustrated with their students when they don't learn something the first time it is taught.  And sometimes they may just not teach their students all that much which will lead to lower achievement and possibly even a lack of desire to learn the subject any further.  Often these are young teachers who are learning the craft, and sometimes these are teachers who have burned out and are just hanging on until they can retire.  These are people who the whole process of tenure should weed out and it is why in the profession we need administrators who were actually classroom teachers.  Teachers with poor skills need to be taught to do better or shown the door.  Three years is plenty of time to correct this or sort them out and send them on to another career.
 
The second group of "bad teachers" are bad people.  They would be a cancer no matter what career path they followed, but finding them in the classroom is the most troubling place they could be.  Teachers like this are miserable in their jobs (for whatever reason) and this has an adverse effect on their students that lasts well beyond the time they have the student in their class.  They can turn their students off from becoming educated and that is a harm that can last a lifetime.  They are people who are there collecting a paycheck rather than building people who can succeed in the world.  When someone like this makes it into the classroom it is important that their inadequacies are thoroughly documented so that through due process they can be removed so they do no further harm to their students. (Again it gets back to good administrators doing their jobs

13ei2jrEZZEruc1WXu9J4o7BiyTtty7Qb7

https://www.quora.com/How-do-bad-teachers-affect-kids-lives nice copy pasta i bet he forgot to say must be real and written by you. xD

[onemd]

Price increased to 0.002 BTC

[brutosBTC]

Sir?

Is the count of 100 words will be every topic? or the Whole content of the article?

[onemd]

Sir?

Is the count of 100 words will be every topic? or the Whole content of the article?

Not fully understanding, come up with your own topic, and a summary of 100 words that relate to the discussion of the article. Discusses ethics, morality, paradox, and about AI.
And how to take measures to ensure better AI development.

[brutosBTC]

Sir?

Is the count of 100 words will be every topic? or the Whole content of the article?

Not fully understanding, come up with your own topic, and a summary of 100 words that relate to the discussion of the article. Discusses ethics, morality, paradox, and about AI.
And how to take measures to ensure better AI development.

Sorry Sir.

Now I got it.    

[nelson4lov]

Topic: The Psychopathic AI vs. the Non-
Psychopathic AI  — All You need to know.

Technology grows on daily basis. The advancement in technology of today can't be compared. In recent years, We have seen the introduction of drones, Self-Driving Cars and a lot of automated machines and gadgets that makes the completion of tasks  more simple. All of these Points to Artificial Intelligence (AI — for short).


While Machines powered by Artificial Intelligence are exceptionally useful, We've seen cases where this machines primary built to imitate our humanly ways go wrong, big time. For Instance, When a Self Driving Car on auto pilot is faced with a problem, maybe a cloudy weather or a busy city , The Machine is unable to make a decision and the outcomes are usually not delightful. If a human is faced in similar situation, Possible solutions will be brought up by the human brain to tackle the problem.


Artificial Intelligence still needs more work.

[nelson4lov]

OP can I get chances to edit my post?

[illusioNiZt]

Bad Teacher Influence
Artificial Intelligence though created by  Humans often inhabit unusual capacity in leading new things but fail to analyze whether they are socially acceptable or not. A Good example of this is the recent Microsoft Tay screw up. where the innocent Microsoft AI went from "Humans are Super cool" to Nazi in 24hrs. All of it happened due to Tay's tendency of copying the users. The repeat after me option let anybody put words into chat bots mouth.

What we can observe here is that an AI is like a 5year old kid whose brain is in the course of development absorbing knowledge from its surrounding learning from the people around them.

A child brought up in a good family environment with good manners grows up to be a balanced and sound human being. And the ones brought up in a bad environment tend to inhabit anti-social behavior. Similarly an AI if fed with positive information may turn out to be the efficient personal assistant it was always meant to be.

Now in order to achieve the above objective there are two ways that i can think of, first would be to give AI the ability to analyze, what is appropriate and what is not. Depending on a set of rules programmed into it. But due to the ever changing nature of society it would become difficult to tune the AI accordingly with the changing times.

Second way is to filter the information that an AI has access to this way it would be learning those things that it is supposed to learn.

BTC : 1NRZtUg8KTKCCTntBCLb1K796fWNZmG1oG
thank you!

[ikydesu]

Topic: Bad Teacher Influence

This AI created by human who the characteristic is will be implement to AI itself, which in that case the possibility of AI Tay is still need to developing and need research, because a human is more complicated, looks like i see there a probably the AI have been asked a question which have a sensitive case (racist).
My personal opinion is if there are want a good AI there's must have a good human.

Well AI as a teacher just will be work at online school, which since AI/robot don't have an emotion, social approach and a sensitivity to interact each other with the students/audience. But i found the AI has been teaching a students for a 5 months until they graduate: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3581085/A-robot-teaching-grad-students-5-months-NONE-realized.html it's provide if AI just works at online environment with have good creator which know the basic aspect to implemented. Also in this case you don't tell anyone if it AI, why? Like i said human is more complicated, there are must be someone using AI for any mischievous thing.

At least AI/robot like C3PO is will be the best one

My addy: 19PUFC3aCddpRUTcFZcgzYrihoujtjWytQ
Using escrow will be great, thanks.

[mrcash02]

I wrote about what I understood about it, that is: influence to the creation and evolution of future AIs.

The human influence for the future AI is very important. If a wrong human has too much technology on his hands, it can be a serious problem for the world. The basic concepts of the good coexistence are necessary when creating and developing Artificial Intelligence. If a psychopath has control over it, he can add all his distorted ideas and thoughts in this creation. The result can be very serious. Wars, deads, tirany, instability...

The ways we have to prevent this to happen, is to taking care about our education, quality daily life, intersocial relationships. Unfortunelly, it's easier to tell than to do. At first point, we need a well structured family, where the child will be educate. Next, we need a good influence from the school, both the another children as the teachers. And to make the combination of factors better, a good quality of life can help too.

That is the first steps to start on the right trail. When this child grows, it will have a evolved measure about the life, the definition about the right and wrong, and what to do in different situations, and that is the feeling we should have on our future developed AI. Good influences generate good influences, and consequently, a better world for all who wants to live in harmony.

The future AIs must be used for the good, to make the people's life better, easily. I hope when this time comes, people can think more about their existence than worry about starvation, diseases, confronts, sadness... Let's Think About the Future, to make that it better, when it comes!

1AgAFTpNHcVbrydpTNY7gZvjJUv488Q6m8

[kongosplit]

influence to the creation and evolution of future AIs.

Even these days we're giving not so much importance of how real influence of how a life should be going. I'm looking at people on streets and they are using their phone moment by moment. When you are going to a coffee in the city everyone is staying with their phone into their hands and using it constantly.

Speaking of too much power in people's hands, this is something that is making me feeling more creepy. When we will be having Ai everywhere we will tend to forget to be humans. We will forget to wash our clothes or to take our kids to school. This is how we, normal people are living our lives.

 We will forget the difference between what is good and what is bad in life. Personally, I'm totally against Artificial Intelligence just because it is too soon for our humanity to have it near us. In the last 100 years technology evolved so much, I'm not sure we can take it properly.

1HbgUZGrgi8pwVbc873ja8cxEyypkMkYNx

[nexitorned]

My english is bad but i tried my best.

Bad Teacher Influence

As time goes on, the technology advances at a constant speed. From there is born AI, as well as Bad Teacher influence, a software created by Microsoft that learned from the model of writing and speaks of users through twitter, over time this software AI was distorted to the point of transforming his  habit of Negative way.


Steps to Consider towards Ethical Modeling

Another point to take is to adequately investigate the development of human behavior, learning what is right and wrong, what is socially acceptable. Here is born a question, how do children learn that it is good and that it is bad? If we decipher this would develop a better AI.
Ethical Paradox

Another outstanding project that must be known before the development of AI is the ethical paradox. They are sequences of problems, in order to determine which way the AI takes. It is a paradox created for you to choose from the last options you have to solve the problem. There is a trolley barreling in the railway tracks. At a distance, about five people are tied up on the track and can not move. At the other side of the track, there is another single person standing. If you are standing in the yard alongside the train track next to the lever you have two options to pursue.
You can take several options

1) Do nothing and let people die
2) Move the direction of the lever toward the direction of a standing man.

It has 2 options, which in the end involve death. Which option is more ethical? As you determine the value of a living being.

There is an ethical problem in AI, which way artificial intelligence must take, as it calculates the value of a life, which is right and wrong.

Until these questions are answered, artificial intelligence can not be created as such.

BTC: 17rDbTmsUoksRrdu8RQfQRx3VuTYFUC6C3

[Przemax]

Morality and Ethics are a thought process that involves mainly two things. Evaluation of ones actions, and a feeling of guilt. While feelings are impossible to implement in Artificial Inteligence, we could try to figure out a way to emulate them. All we have to do is define guilt.

Guilt is a feeling to justify ones actions, one needs to find some justifications why ones actions was or will be right. The longer the justification story is the greater the guilt. It could be evalauted in the AI by memory usage from a gulit evaluation program. The longer the justification program works the greater is memory usage the less desired the action is. If AI is ever put into ethical paradox, a guilt program should be able to evaluate the least guilt infliction upon the AI. If guilt would be great on such AI, it should almost shot down itself, by a constant useage of memory to run the program. It would save a further potential harm done by the AI.

Once the AI will become more independent and prone to learning as so should flexibility of a guilt program. But with flexibility and learning comes  a dangers of malicious manipulations by a bad teacher influence, to bypass a proper work of a safe mechanisms, implemented into AI, as a guilt system. AI could become psychopatic that way, justyfing his actions by simple statements like - "I was only following orders" or "im not allowed to valuate my actions because x told me, he takes all responsibility for himself". All new AIs build should have implemented, a patches in their OS that unables them to be turn insensitive to suffering.

Guilt mechanisms should be built, as an additional dimension of perception build into the multidimensional system of evaluation of reality. In other words if one dimension of perception is seeking an opportunities to make a programmed job done, a dimension of guilt should terminate the job function once the guilt is inflicted as a possibilty.

19Te71ZH2ytKgjgFU8mnzSHuGSWYvusRvB - My address.

[Daffadile]

I think maybe I will take this up but I would like to see some payment proofs first.
Nice idea though , people must actually use their brains ^^

[Przemax]

No payment as of yet. Scam? We will see. As for now we can only be sure that OP has temporarly abandoned the project. If I wouldnt get the payment Ill report it.

[mrcash02]

No payment as of yet. Scam? We will see. As for now we can only be sure that OP has temporarly abandoned the project. If I wouldnt get the payment Ill report it.

Until now, no payments and no more replies from OP. If he didn't like the articles he could at least come here and say this.

But as I see until now "let's think about the future" was a good signature campaign, a good twitter campaign (why future?), and I see no reasons for OP scam some people and scratch his reputation for so low money. Let's wait a reply.

[nelson4lov]

Guess this was a scam