Lauda I been SHITTY!

[angrybirdy]

hello im kwukduck
and i want to complain about laudas behavior, first of all lauda don't have the power to give us red trust to those eligible account for me lauda don't also have a power to give us red trust i saw his trust or sent trust. LAUDA MUST REMOVE IN DT AND STAFF

[1715625145]

1715625145

[calpsy2]

Brand new account made up to post this well detailed indepth review ? ? ?

Thanks

[sbogovac]

hello im kwukduck
and i want to complain about laudas behavior, first of all lauda don't have the power to give us red trust to those eligible account for me lauda don't also have a power to give us red trust i saw his trust or sent trust. LAUDA MUST REMOVE IN DT AND STAFF

Dear kwukduck/angrybirdy/whoever, please use the scam report format.

EDIT: N/A anymore since this discussion has been moved from 'Scam Accusations' to 'Reputation'.

[angrybirdy]

Lost my cool after reading Lauda's reasonings

[xhomerx10]

hello im kwukduck
and i want to complain about laudas behavior, first of all lauda don't have the power to give us red trust to those eligible account for me lauda don't also have a power to give us red trust i saw his trust or sent trust. LAUDA MUST REMOVE IN DT AND STAFF

 kwukduck is much better than this at the English language.  You are butchering it.
NOT kwukduck.

 Why don't you go on "Vaca" with knighton and relax.

[angrybirdy]

I can do perfect English but why do that? Most of the time those who speak/write in 99+% Gobbledigook dont get red trust. Justice, spammers? My posts are way better than some, always on topic. Why red trust? Why Why Why? To let me learn my lesson, well do it on everyone else all at the same time. You are not a campaign manager to be removing people from their rightful claims. There should be chain of command, you should let campaign managers do their job.

[KWH]

I can do perfect English but why do that? Most of the time those who speak/write in 99+% Gobbledigook dont get red trust. Justice, spammers? My posts are way better than some, always on topic. Why red trust? Why Why Why? To let me learn my lesson, well do it on everyone else all at the same time. You are not a campaign manager to be removing people from their rightful claims. There should be chain of command, you should let campaign managers do their job.

You have no "right" to conduct business here. None of us has that "right". Instead of blaming others, blame yourself. You made the posts.
You also know spammy posts will bring some scorn or worse if you wear a signature.

[cpfreeplz]

hello im kwukduck
and i want to complain about laudas behavior, first of all lauda don't have the power to give us red trust to those eligible account for me lauda don't also have a power to give us red trust i saw his trust or sent trust. LAUDA MUST REMOVE IN DT AND STAFF

Lol before we go any further don't forget to sign a message proving you're kwukduck. Why would you post from a newbie rather than your main.. ? If you're banned then this is a ban evasion and if you're not then this is just nonesense. Prove you're kwukduck so we can not listen to you but know who you are at least hahaha.

[abhishek.g]

You know where do you guys make mistake ? You guys are not giving a red trust back . This is the major problem, if you believe he/she is a shit (which is likely) then just spoil their trust back. Its all about their creepy mindset.

[Lutpin]

You know where do you guys make mistake ? You guys are not giving a red trust back . This is the major problem, if you believe he/she is a shit (which is likely) then just spoil their trust back. Its all about their creepy mindset.

Are you now coming to every thread about Lauda, yahoo or me to cry and give your bs?

You are not a campaign manager to be removing people from their rightful claims. There should be chain of command, you should let campaign managers do their job.

Being in a campaign, being paid to post, all that stuff is a privilege, not a right. You should handle it like that.

LAUDA MUST BE REMOVED IN FROM DT AND STAFF

There's 2 people you should talk to about that.
The first is theymos, who decided to make Lauda part of staff.
The second is Blazed, who currently puts Lauda into DT.
Good luck with your endeavours.

[robelneo]

The red trust in my trust rating comes from Lauda,but I'm not taking it personal,I think his reason is fair,and it should be treated as wakeup call,also had a forum of my own and if that forum grows I would love some one with Lauda's character to manage moderation..

[abhishek.g]

You know where do you guys make mistake ? You guys are not giving a red trust back . This is the major problem, if you believe he/she is a shit (which is likely) then just spoil their trust back. Its all about their creepy mindset.

Are you now coming to every thread about Lauda, yahoo or me to cry and give your bs?

You are not a campaign manager to be removing people from their rightful claims. There should be chain of command, you should let campaign managers do their job.

Being in a campaign, being paid to post, all that stuff is a privilege, not a right. You should handle it like that.

LAUDA MUST BE REMOVED IN FROM DT AND STAFF

There's 2 people you should talk to about that.
The first is theymos, who decided to make Lauda part of staff.
The second is Blazed, who currently puts Lauda into DT.
Good luck with your endeavours.

I will do whatever I want to spoil your non sense posts but seems like you are coming to every thread to justify yourself .

[cpfreeplz]

I will do whatever I want to spoil your non sense posts but seems like you are coming to every thread to justify yourself .

That'll get you banned pretty quickly. I say keep up the good work you're doing a fabulous job!

Are you now coming to every thread about Lauda, yahoo or me to cry and give your bs?

So it would appear lol. I guess with red trust you pretty much have to find your own fun on this forum

[abhishek.g]

I will do whatever I want to spoil your non sense posts but seems like you are coming to every thread to justify yourself .

That'll get you banned pretty quickly. I say keep up the good work you're doing a fabulous job!

Are you now coming to every thread about Lauda, yahoo or me to cry and give your bs?

So it would appear lol. I guess with red trust you pretty much have to find your own fun on this forum

And I want that ! . I know what I am doing , you do your own job and keep posting . Next time I would like to see some informational posts .

[Gunthar]

I still wonder why the fuck such threads with such title are allowed tho: as far as i can understand we are allowed to insult other users as long as it is motivated and with a critical-constructive tone.

Saying someone is a shit on a topic title doesnt let me fucking read the topic nor it does motivate me to understand the reasons why Lauda is being called names.

Reading this topic title just makes me push the reply button without bothering what is said here and post something like: FUCK YOU! (and all the ones that allow such things)
~Gun

EDIT: Archived

[K~Ehleyr]

Jesus Christ, when will you people realise that this sort of reaction only proves that the red trust is absolutely spot on!!  I'd trust Lauda's word over this sort of juvenile bile-spewing any day of the month.

[Lauda]

I still wonder why the fuck such threads with such title are allowed tho: as far as i can understand we are allowed to insult other users as long as it is motivated and with a critical-constructive tone.

That is correct (allowed if it contains *anything* constructive in it), and I do not know the answer to that.

[gorgon666]

You have no "right" to conduct business here. None of us has that "right". Instead of blaming others, blame yourself. You made the posts.
You also know spammy posts will bring some scorn or worse if you wear a signature.

I think this might be crazy, but it might be logical to expect a little bit of criticism when you make controversial/questionable decisions, especially those that affect others is a negative way.

I am surprised that more people are not calling for Lauda to explain herself in regards to many of her decisions -- both in terms of trust and in terms of moderation actions. The maybe one time that Lauda was asked to explain herself, she only embarrassed herself and made herself look immature, or maybe I should say, exposed herself as being immature.

[carlosiness]

I can do perfect English but why do that? Most of the time those who speak/write in 99+% Gobbledigook dont get red trust. Justice, spammers? My posts are way better than some, always on topic. Why red trust? Why Why Why? To let me learn my lesson, well do it on everyone else all at the same time. You are not a campaign manager to be removing people from their rightful claims. There should be chain of command, you should let campaign managers do their job.

You call that perfect English? Alright mate, first of all; English isn't something that you do. Secondly, you made a whole lot of mistakes. I'd say you're decent but not even close to perfect.

[angrybirdy]

First I want to apologize to Lauda for everything I've said. And even if Lauda won't accept my apology, I still would like to apologize. I have been immature and irresponsible and no I am not kwukduck, so to the latter I apologize too. I also would like to say sorry for all who have wasted their time reading this thread, and to the staff for adding garbage to the current pile.

I promise I will do my best to be responsible and helpful in most(if not all) of my future posts. Thank you and Happy New Year.