Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2018, 11:37:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Hash rate on Atom 330 drops after 0.3.12  (Read 1374 times)
ehj666
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 08, 2010, 10:21:26 PM
 #1

I did not see any other posts on this, but will apologize in advance if it has been addressed elsewhere. At any rate, I have found a significant drop in the hash rate when running Bitcoin on an Atom 330 processor after version 0.3.12. On a 1.6 Ghz Atom 330, 0.3.12 yields a hash rate of approximately 850 khash/s, while under 0.3.13 and 0.3.14 it drops to barely over 500 khash/s. I have two such machines and the results on both are virtually identical. They are both running Ubuntu 10.04, I have not tested under any other OS.

Several other 32 and 64 bit processors I have tested show no degradation since 0.3.12. Does anyone happen to know if there were any changes between 0.3.12 and 0.3.13 which might be adversely affecting the Atom 330 or perhaps SMP processors in general?

Thanks,
ehj
1542065867
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542065867

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542065867
Reply with quote  #2

1542065867
Report to moderator
1542065867
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542065867

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542065867
Reply with quote  #2

1542065867
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1542065867
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542065867

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542065867
Reply with quote  #2

1542065867
Report to moderator
jgarzik
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 08, 2010, 11:23:15 PM
 #2

Does the "-4way" switch do anything?

Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own.
Visit bloq.com / metronome.io
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
ehj666
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 09, 2010, 12:24:34 AM
 #3

Either no difference or even slightly slower.

Regards,
ehj
hugolp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000


semux


View Profile
November 09, 2010, 10:19:41 AM
 #4

I have noticed the same.

If you only use 2 cores (out of the virtual 4) it does not matter much, but if you configure it to use 3 or 4 the gain is ridiculous, while before it was noticeable.

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses .100% original codebase.
  Superfast with .30 seconds instant finality.
  Tested .5000 tx per block. on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!