Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 05:42:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin 與 鬱金香狂熱 有什麼不一樣?  (Read 1116 times)
ikal (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 08, 2013, 12:19:48 PM
 #1

歡迎支持Bitcoin 的朋友一起來討論  Wink
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714110126
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714110126

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714110126
Reply with quote  #2

1714110126
Report to moderator
1714110126
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714110126

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714110126
Reply with quote  #2

1714110126
Report to moderator
God9394
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 08, 2013, 12:21:27 PM
 #2

不了解bitcoin,都應該先了解鬱金香狂熱是什麼吧
bit_kevin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10


btc.com


View Profile WWW
April 08, 2013, 02:15:37 PM
 #3

歡迎支持Bitcoin 的朋友一起來討論  Wink
郁金香当时只是短时间稀缺而已,并不是真正稀缺的资源,通过人工繁殖可以大量培育,放大市场供给。
而BTC是绝对的总量有限。
lixiaolai
a friend of time
VIP
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 13, 2013, 02:31:09 AM
 #4

最本质的差别在于:

郁金香无论如何也不算是货币;比特币是真正的货币。


inblockchain.com
ikal (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 08:49:07 AM
 #5

歡迎支持Bitcoin 的朋友一起來討論  Wink
郁金香当时只是短时间稀缺而已,并不是真正稀缺的资源,通过人工繁殖可以大量培育,放大市场供给。
而BTC是绝对的总量有限。


而且BTC不會像鬱金香一樣腐爛
bitgold
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 12:34:45 PM
 #6

郁金香热的传说可能是不少人为的夸大臆想成分,跟中国的纪念章,和田玉,藏獒,核桃热等等差不多。

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania
Mackay's account of inexplicable mania was unchallenged, and mostly unexamined, until the 1980s.[35] However, research into tulip mania since then, especially by proponents of the efficient market hypothesis,[8] who are more skeptical of speculative bubbles in general, suggests that his story was incomplete and inaccurate. In her 2007 scholarly analysis Tulipmania, Anne Goldgar states that the phenomenon was limited to "a fairly small group", and that most accounts from the period "are based on one or two contemporary pieces of propaganda and a prodigious amount of plagiarism".[9] Peter Garber argues that the bubble "was no more than a meaningless winter drinking game, played by a plague-ridden population that made use of the vibrant tulip market."[36]


Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!