Man-made global warming = Govt take care me for life

[mainpmf]

Always temperature changes.This year is colder than usual and glaciers may again increase. It seems to me that a story about global warming was invented to make money and all. There is no evidence

Tell this to the inhabitants of island nations such as Maldives and Tuvalu. Many of the smaller islands in these nations have become uninhabitable, as a result of the sea level rise.

Maybe so, but in other areas the opposite drought. Water becomes less. In Europe, this year's winter much colder than in the past. This means that during the winter the ice will grow at the pole. The earth is self-regulating planet and all will be well.

Wahou! Did you read that?
Oh thank god! The planet is self-regulating that's a good news! I'm so glad you precised that point.
And me who thought that any natural action on nature and environmental change took hundreds of years at least and dozens of thousands of years most of the time. I guess that the planet will still perfectly adapt and "self regulate" from the influence of Human actions in the last 50 years, why shouldn't be the case?
Well MAYBE, but just a tiny little maybe, that we see changes happening so fast we don't even truly understand how it's even possible.
So MAYBE that your "all will be well" argument is bullshit.
Especially if your in a sensible region and climate!

[1714862729]

1714862729

[1714862729]

1714862729

[1714862729]

1714862729

[iamnotback]

Well MAYBE, but just a tiny little maybe, that we see changes happening so fast we don't even truly understand how it's even possible.
So MAYBE that your "all will be well" argument is bullshit.

And maybe because of that illogical fear man will create a socialism that causes a megadeath. Ahem. Actually not maybe, guaranteed.

I would take the 0.0000000000000000001% chance that that man could destroy his environment totally to the 100% chance of socialism causing another megadeath as it always does throughout human history.

And guaranteed because retards (like you) are more populous. So you enjoy culling yourselves. Go forth and reap what you sow.

[iamnotback]

The first one which is just plain bullshit without any source. I mean I could do the same and just write long article without any data any source any experiment or any proof of any kind and just tell you "you see you're wrong". Your first article is just plain bullshit and the most funny part is that it talks about PROPAGANDA xD
The second one is compelling 2 articles of popular press, not the best source but at least there is one. And then you go to the linked article and you see that your link is willingly forgetting parts of the originals article just to lie to you.

You talk about propaganda and facts? Please can you tell me how an article written without any source is a fact. Or how an article taking only half of the original statement is a fact.

You're only lying to yourself man.

Do some research and stop lying.

Or continue lying and cull yourselves. I don't care. You are determined to destroy yourselves so just go ahead. You retards are pitiful.

[Sithara007]

Always temperature changes.This year is colder than usual and glaciers may again increase. It seems to me that a story about global warming was invented to make money and all. There is no evidence

Tell this to the inhabitants of island nations such as Maldives and Tuvalu. Many of the smaller islands in these nations have become uninhabitable, as a result of the sea level rise.

Maybe so, but in other areas the opposite drought. Water becomes less. In Europe, this year's winter much colder than in the past. This means that during the winter the ice will grow at the pole. The earth is self-regulating planet and all will be well.

The climatic variation is worsening. Both the droughts and floods are becoming more common. Increased temperature means increased evaporation from the water bodies, and this results in increased precipitation in some regions.

[mainpmf]

Well MAYBE, but just a tiny little maybe, that we see changes happening so fast we don't even truly understand how it's even possible.
So MAYBE that your "all will be well" argument is bullshit.

And maybe because of that illogical fear man will create a socialism that causes a megadeath. Ahem. Actually not maybe, guaranteed.

I would take the 0.0000000000000000001% chance that that man could destroy his environment totally to the 100% chance of socialism causing another megadeath as it always does throughout human history.

And guaranteed because retards (like you) are more populous. So you enjoy culling yourselves. Go forth and reap what you sow.

Oo

Did anyone see the logic here? I'm still looking for it!
So. A lot of question:
1/ do you realize that your "0.00000000000000000001%" of chance is actually currently the strongest destruction of biodiversity since the last asteroids that destroyed 80% of our world?
2/ where do you get your 100% chance about socialism? Most socialist countries  are doing not only pretty well but with a greater IDH than others

AND THE MOST IMPORTANT
3/ WTF is the link? Oo
I mean we're talking about ecological problems, what is the link with socialism for first and what the fuck is this megadeath you're talking about? xD

[mainpmf]

The first one which is just plain bullshit without any source. I mean I could do the same and just write long article without any data any source any experiment or any proof of any kind and just tell you "you see you're wrong". Your first article is just plain bullshit and the most funny part is that it talks about PROPAGANDA xD
The second one is compelling 2 articles of popular press, not the best source but at least there is one. And then you go to the linked article and you see that your link is willingly forgetting parts of the originals article just to lie to you.

You talk about propaganda and facts? Please can you tell me how an article written without any source is a fact. Or how an article taking only half of the original statement is a fact.

You're only lying to yourself man.

Do some research and stop lying.

Or continue lying and cull yourselves. I don't care. You are determined to destroy yourselves so just go ahead. You retards are pitiful.

That's what I did by clicking on your links. You refuse to answer but it doesn't change facts:
You're first article has no source. That's a fact. You're telling I'm lying? Well go on and give me the sources of your first article: THERE ARE NONE
And for the second anyone can just click on the sources to see even just with the title that this article is willingly cherrypicking informations as the title of the sources article are "temperature changing not as fast as expected" and not "temperature isn't changing" as your article tries to claim.

So stop acting as a troll. You say I'm lying? Prove it. Because I claim you're just spreading propaganda and I prove it. Anyone can see it by just clicking on your articles.

[iamnotback]

That's what I did by clicking on your links.

That is not research.

[iamnotback]

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/global-warming-opps-ice-age-hits-europe/

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/the-anti-climate-change-scientists-are-at-last-being-heard/

[mainpmf]

That's what I did by clicking on your links.

That is not research.

Dude... You can't be honest here no?

I'm saying your sources are pure propaganda. Not only saying it but also proving it. And what do you answer to that? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Except the numerous insults of course, as it seems that it's the only thing you know to do. Insulting the opponents without any arguments.

[mainpmf]

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/global-warming-opps-ice-age-hits-europe/

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/the-anti-climate-change-scientists-are-at-last-being-heard/

Oh look!

Other articles of less than 2 paragraphs without any source or arguments...
Anyone taking you seriously is either a troll either someone completely dumb.
Climate change is a complex subject and you CAN have arguments against the current thesis. But what you're doing is plain trolling nothing else.

[TicTacTic]

That's what I did by clicking on your links.

That is not research.

Dude... You can't be honest here no?

I'm saying your sources are pure propaganda. Not only saying it but also proving it. And what do you answer to that? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Except the numerous insults of course, as it seems that it's the only thing you know to do. Insulting the opponents without any arguments.

On this fake issue a lot of people earn money. Why they are so sensitive to criticism. I wouldn't mind if it was actively implemented alternative energy sources, but this not happening.

[mainpmf]

That's what I did by clicking on your links.

That is not research.

Dude... You can't be honest here no?

I'm saying your sources are pure propaganda. Not only saying it but also proving it. And what do you answer to that? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Except the numerous insults of course, as it seems that it's the only thing you know to do. Insulting the opponents without any arguments.

On this fake issue a lot of people earn money. Why they are so sensitive to criticism. I wouldn't mind if it was actively implemented alternative energy sources, but this not happening.

That's...Wrong.
First people earn money with climate change studies but they would earn even more working in other fields...
Second, lot's of alternative energy sources are implemented accross the world but government tend to prefer the polluting ones even if they are far more expensive!

[Sithara007]

That's...Wrong.
First people earn money with climate change studies but they would earn even more working in other fields...
Second, lot's of alternative energy sources are implemented accross the world but government tend to prefer the polluting ones even if they are far more expensive!

I would say that the lobby which argues for alternative energy is vastly out-funded by the lobby which argues in favor of increased use of fossil fuels. The latter receives billions of USD in funds from the GCC states such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. For the past many decades, they have successfully managed to sabotage government support for projects which generate alternative energy.

[ridery99]

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/global-warming-opps-ice-age-hits-europe/

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/the-anti-climate-change-scientists-are-at-last-being-heard/

Oh look!

Other articles of less than 2 paragraphs without any source or arguments...
Anyone taking you seriously is either a troll either someone completely dumb.
Climate change is a complex subject and you CAN have arguments against the current thesis. But what you're doing is plain trolling nothing else.

Mr. Armstrong predicted a global stock market crash to happen in late 2015.. Now he is a climate scientist? Nice 

[mainpmf]

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/global-warming-opps-ice-age-hits-europe/

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/the-anti-climate-change-scientists-are-at-last-being-heard/

Oh look!

Other articles of less than 2 paragraphs without any source or arguments...
Anyone taking you seriously is either a troll either someone completely dumb.
Climate change is a complex subject and you CAN have arguments against the current thesis. But what you're doing is plain trolling nothing else.

Mr. Armstrong predicted a global stock market crash to happen in late 2015.. Now he is a climate scientist? Nice 

Yeah I like the fact that his "proofs" all come from a site named "armstrong economics" xD

But let's be honest he has nothing. No arguments no sources nothing. Only insults. It's complicated to deny climate change completely. But the thesis of climate change aren't perfect, far from it. There are numerous points that can be heavily discussed. Especially concerning the long term effects on biodiversity which are not well known.
Or the fact that CO2 and temperature are linked (that's sure) but the link isn't perfectly clear.

[iamnotback]

That's what I did by clicking on your links.

That is not research.

Dude... You can't be honest here no?

I'm saying your sources are pure propaganda.

Do research idiot:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/nasa-reports-antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/sun-drop-in-energy-output-is-stronger-than-expected/

[grenade launcher]

That's...Wrong.
First people earn money with climate change studies but they would earn even more working in other fields...
Second, lot's of alternative energy sources are implemented accross the world but government tend to prefer the polluting ones even if they are far more expensive!

I would say that the lobby which argues for alternative energy is vastly out-funded by the lobby which argues in favor of increased use of fossil fuels. The latter receives billions of USD in funds from the GCC states such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. For the past many decades, they have successfully managed to sabotage government support for projects which generate alternative energy.

Last year Alan Musk introduced energy new. Tile which produces so much energy that the house provides full autonomy. I hope that very soon this technology will be available to all. Maybe the surge of terrorism associated with it?

[mainpmf]

That's what I did by clicking on your links.

That is not research.

Dude... You can't be honest here no?

I'm saying your sources are pure propaganda.

Do research idiot:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/nasa-reports-antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/sun-drop-in-energy-output-is-stronger-than-expected/

Please all of you, I beg you, click on those links.
Click on those links and see by yourself the proud "iamnotback" and his incredible argument of one word: "idiot", one source "www.armstrongeconomics.com" and all those beautiful article not only false, but I guess they're in fact trolls.
Click back on those links iamnotback, and try to find ONE SOURCE of the articles.

Once you admited there is no source, could you please explain me how a freaking 8 lines "article" made by an unknown guy on the internet without any link, source, record or data, is worth anything?

Please just explain that.

[protokol]

Yeah, he didn't used to be this bad. In fact if this is the same user "Anonymint" and his account hasn't been sold/transferred, I've seen him disagree with Armstrong on a number of occasions. But you're right, those are sorry excuses for "research", no sources or even real explanations.

For example, where's the data for "Antarctic sea ice record high" come from, is it an all time record, is it a record of thickness or area, is it a seasonal record based on percentage between summer/winter etc?

When you question him or post conflicting data, he just calls you a "leftist idiot". It's become like trying to debate with a brick wall...

[mainpmf]

Yeah, he didn't used to be this bad. In fact if this is the same user "Anonymint" and his account hasn't been sold/transferred, I've seen him disagree with Armstrong on a number of occasions. But you're right, those are sorry excuses for "research", no sources or even real explanations.

For example, where's the data for "Antarctic sea ice record high" come from, is it an all time record, is it a record of thickness or area, is it a seasonal record based on percentage between summer/winter etc?

When you question him or post conflicting data, he just calls you a "leftist idiot". It's become like trying to debate with a brick wall...

Thank you, I'm glad someone checked this.
Problem is that people like him talk a lot. They create thread made to deceive people just to spread their religion (because when you have multiple beliefs supported by 0 facts or data it's a religion).

I mean you can disagree with many things and climate change isn't an easy question, but you can't just deny it by denying nasa records but accepting blog articles without sources as solid proofs xD