Man-made global warming = Govt take care me for life

[iamnotback]

That's what I did by clicking on your links.

That is not research.

Dude... You can't be honest here no?

I'm saying your sources are pure propaganda.

Do research idiot:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/nasa-reports-antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/sun-drop-in-energy-output-is-stronger-than-expected/

Please all of you, I beg you, click on those links.
Click on those links and see by yourself the proud "iamnotback" and his incredible argument of one word: "idiot", one source "www.armstrongeconomics.com" and all those beautiful article not only false, but I guess they're in fact trolls.
Click back on those links iamnotback, and try to find ONE SOURCE of the articles.

Once you admited there is no source, could you please explain me how a freaking 8 lines "article" made by an unknown guy on the internet without any link, source, record or data, is worth anything?

Please just explain that.

You pinheads haven't learned how to use Google yet.

https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum/

Sorry I don't think I need to explain how to use Google. Ask a 5 year old to help you.

The following is known as "backsplaining".

“The planet as a whole is doing what was expected in terms of warming. Sea ice as a whole is decreasing as expected, but just like with global warming, not every location with sea ice will have a downward trend in ice extent,” Parkinson said.

Now those who have a brainstem will dig deeper and find the error in the above backsplaining.

Maybe a 5 year old can help you, given their brain maybe hasn't yet been polluted with official government lies.

[1714862413]

1714862413

[1714862413]

1714862413

[1714862413]

1714862413

[1714862413]

1714862413

[1714862413]

1714862413

[1714862413]

1714862413

[iamnotback]

When you question him or post conflicting data, he just calls you a "leftist idiot". It's become like trying to debate with a brick wall...

Pinhead in all his glory:

Anyone who pays much attention to contentious scienctific debates in our time (vaccinations, GMOs, global climate change, etc) recognizes 'peer review' as a laughable circle-jerk which means little or nothing when corporate money is involved and corporate profits are on the line.

That pinhead protokol doesn't have the intellect to incorporate such holistic analysis.

Smallpox was eradicated from the Earth due to vaccination (pretty much, some strains still exist in high security virology labs, but the general population doesn't suffer from it because it was destroyed through vaccination programmes). That in itself is a some pretty thorough evidence that some vaccines at least work as they should. Many other serious diseases are now under control through vaccination.

You repeat your same error from the AGW thread, in that you think a century is of any significance at all relative to the repeating cycles throughout all of recorded history.

Smallpox is not eradicated. It may be dormant and eventually will mutate and pounce again.

The benefit from some vaccinations may be worth it, but we can't know the costs. We don't know what impacts we are making. For example, by ruining human natural selection for surviving viruses, we may be preparing ourselves for a megadeath due to allowing many of the weak DNA to proliferate (procreate).

A. This chart only looks at deaths in the US from 1900-1965 (a pretty small amount of time),

And you conveniently argue against the relevance of short periods of time when it suits your agenda. You are not objective.

As for your cancer comments, you should know that one of the main reasons that cancer has become so prevalent is because humans are living longer and longer, giving cancer more time to develop. That's why you don't see many animals in their natural environments get cancer, because they die from other causes before cancer kills them. Modern medicine has increased the life expectancy by a huge amount, so cancers have obviously become a statistically higher killer. This is well known in the scientific community.

Prove that jackass.

Explain how the Japanese on Okinawa live so long without cancer.

http://www.hngn.com/articles/7367/20130710/okinawa-diet-followers-average-life-span-116-years-eat-video.htm

Answer me this: Why is the life expectancy of the majority of the world's population (at least in the most developed countries) at an all time high? If vaccines are deadly, wouldn't we be seeing a decrease in life expectancy?

Food for thought.

Do you have an IQ of 105?

WTF is wrong with your brain.

As if vaccines are the only technological improvement over the past century which has impacted the quality of life of humans.  

What about refrigeration.

I don't like the idea of too much state involvement in people's personal lives, but I also don't believe herd immunity should be compromised because some parents refuse to vaccinate their children - it puts others in danger that may not be able to be vaccinated for real medical reasons (such as allergic reactions)

I don't think full on prosecution of parents is fair, but I do think they should be "persuaded" to vaccinate - for example some countries have started stopping welfare/benefits for parents who refuse to vaccinate their children. That seems like a good idea to me.

Now you show your true face.

You behave like a narcissistic little dictator, who knows it all and likes to play god. It's disgusting.

It's unbearable to read your delusional belief in medical pseudo-science and open disrespect for individual freedom.

You are now on my ignore list.

Another Hitler wolf in "kind, caring, leftist" sheepskin.

These are the most dangerous virus on the planet and we need a forced eradication plan to remove them from the planet. Ignore is too Libertarian, hit him with his own philosophical insanity.

[mainpmf]

That's what I did by clicking on your links.

That is not research.

Dude... You can't be honest here no?

I'm saying your sources are pure propaganda.

Do research idiot:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/nasa-reports-antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/sun-drop-in-energy-output-is-stronger-than-expected/

Please all of you, I beg you, click on those links.
Click on those links and see by yourself the proud "iamnotback" and his incredible argument of one word: "idiot", one source "www.armstrongeconomics.com" and all those beautiful article not only false, but I guess they're in fact trolls.
Click back on those links iamnotback, and try to find ONE SOURCE of the articles.

Once you admited there is no source, could you please explain me how a freaking 8 lines "article" made by an unknown guy on the internet without any link, source, record or data, is worth anything?

Please just explain that.

-snip- blablabla

Did you see any explanation concerning the fact that his links have 0 sources and are just basic blog articles?

Oh and we can maybe talk about how he didn't even read the nasa article he gives xD

[protokol]

iamnotback, you're a fucking hypocrite.

Another Hitler wolf in "kind, caring, leftist" sheepskin.

These are the most dangerous virus on the planet and we need a forced eradication plan to remove them from the planet.

Ahh, the irony, it burns... 

You post bullshit evidence that is worth nothing, resort to ad hominem attacks when your evidence is questioned, and you even stoop so low as to edit my posts, and quote them out of context. Now you're copying my posts from other threads to try and make a point?

Get back on the meds mate, and if you want to make solid arguments you might want to actually address people's points, rather than call them names like a spoilt child.

You fucking buffoon.

(See, I can do it too, doesn't make me big or clever).

[mainpmf]

iamnotback, you're a fucking hypocrite.

Another Hitler wolf in "kind, caring, leftist" sheepskin.

These are the most dangerous virus on the planet and we need a forced eradication plan to remove them from the planet.

Ahh, the irony, it burns... 

You post bullshit evidence that is worth nothing, resort to ad hominem attacks when your evidence is questioned, and you even stoop so low as to edit my posts, and quote them out of context. Now you're copying my posts from other threads to try and make a point?

Get back on the meds mate, and if you want to make solid arguments you might want to actually address people's points, rather than call them names like a spoilt child.

You fucking buffoon.

(See, I can do it too, doesn't make me big or clever).

Funny part is that you can't.

Even when trying to blatantly insult without reasoning, you can't help but to add at least some logic
Moreover you don't manage to reach the vocabulary of our friend. Still far too sophisticated. "Buffoon" man

Anyway I think we mostly agree on the ecological question!

[trollercoaster]

Here's something you don't see every day, fish snap frozen in a lake, from lake Andes in South Dakota.

[mainpmf]

Here's something you don't see every day, fish snap frozen in a lake, from lake Andes in South Dakota.

Wahou indeed you don't see that everyday!
I got to say I don't even understand. How's that possible?
Isn't it a painting? It looks like a painting. If you could give the source that would be awesome!
Anyway I wouldn't like to be those fishes xD

[noel2123]

Government should know that our mother nature will be destroyed if global warming still continues. Government should do some things to make our own life be protected from some of the effect of global warming. You cannot experience, but from your mind, you should know what do's and dont's for our own mother nature

[bitcoinboy12]

Government should know that our mother nature will be destroyed if global warming still continues. Government should do some things to make our own life be protected from some of the effect of global warming. You cannot experience, but from your mind, you should know what do's and dont's for our own mother nature

We can also help out battle global warming. Everyone then just have to be responsible of what he is doing for, and against, nature. We should practice first what we preach. Then raise awareness and share it to everyone.

[bryant.coleman]

Government should know that our mother nature will be destroyed if global warming still continues. Government should do some things to make our own life be protected from some of the effect of global warming. You cannot experience, but from your mind, you should know what do's and dont's for our own mother nature

The effects of global warming are not uniform everywhere. For some countries, such as the Pacific island nations, preventing further rise in the temperature is a major priority. But for some others, such as Saudi Arabia and China, it is not even a minor issue. And also, there are certain nations which are benefiting from the global warming.

[Sithara007]

We can also help out battle global warming. Everyone then just have to be responsible of what he is doing for, and against, nature. We should practice first what we preach. Then raise awareness and share it to everyone.

Here are a few steps which we can implement, in order to combat global warming:

1. Boycott furniture made from Peruvian, Brazilian and Indonesian timber, as these countries refuse to act against deforestation.
2. Use natural gas instead of gasoline in your vehicles.
3. Purchase solar panels.
4. Practice recycling.
5. Conserve water and electricity.

[iamnotback]

Going to be laughing at your idiots frozen in the northern hemisphere...

The idiot Marxist from the global warming thread comes over here to try his luck at putting his foot in his mouth some more...

80% of the people in the Philippines have Tuberculosis which is a very serious illness spread by coughing. You will catch this. I did. You will then need 6 months of medicines and you will never be guaranteed to be cured. You can relapse later in life.

Incidence of Tuberculosis in Philippines is 322 per 100,000 or 0.3% according to the World Bank.

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.TBS.INCD?name_desc=true

Those are active symptomatic TB disease admitted to a hospital for treatment on an annual basis.

It appears to be difficult to get the LTBI rate online, probably because the government does not warn to alarm you idiots about how bad the problem really is. But the doctors have all told me the rate of LTBI is 70 - 80%.

The incidence of latent TB infection is 70 - 80%. Here is one resource that documents the infection rate is 8 to 12 times higher than the smear positive incidence rate:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18235886

Even amongst healthcare workers in the Philippines the LTBI (latent TB) rate was measured at 27%:

http://www.ejbronchology.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1687-8426;year=2015;volume=9;issue=2;spage=183;epage=187;aulast=Abdelghaffar

The following resource says 2.33 billion people have LTBI:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024230/

Here is a 46% LTBI incidence in a village in China:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440671/

And healthy people usually don't get tuberculosis from coughing. If that was the case, then the American authorities might have put up a health warning on the travel advisories.

STFU idiot:

When people with TB in their lungs or throat cough, laugh, sneeze, sing, or even talk, the germs that cause TB may be spread into the air. If another person breathes in these germs there is a chance that they will become infected.

[Hydrogen]

Trees and plants store (sequester) carbon dioxide.

The leaves of plants also evaporate water into the atmosphere, which produces rain.

The main cause of drought & climate change is deforestation.

[mainpmf]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

iamnotback saying that Sithara007 is a leftist idiot xD

That's so fucking funny!!!
It's like conservatives freaks don't even know what left is and means!!!

"you disagree with me, you're just a leftist idiot that's all!!" xD

So much stupidity in so few posts!!!

[DrPepperJC]

Trees and plants store (sequester) carbon dioxide.

The leaves of plants also evaporate water into the atmosphere, which produces rain.

The main cause of drought & climate change is deforestation.

I agree with you. All carbon dioxide trees could absorb. The problem is that talking about the transition to alternative sources of energy while not forcing consumers of the forest to recover the amount.

[Sithara007]

I agree with you. All carbon dioxide trees could absorb. The problem is that talking about the transition to alternative sources of energy while not forcing consumers of the forest to recover the amount.

Deforestation is actually one of the main reasons for global warming. 13,000,000 hectares of forests are cut down or burned every year, and most of this deforestation occurs in tropical countries such as Brazil, Peru, Indonesia (the current global leader in deforestation) and DRC.

[audaciousbeing]

I believe it is the responsibility of any sane government to protect its citizen and if there are no citizens, I am sure there wont be no government and if they want to continue to be in government, then they need to make sure the citizen will continue to live. In the case of global warming it is their job to regulate such because they are the ones that have the legitimacy to make the policies to make it happen. They fail to provide a good transportation system so we can buy enough cars then they can generate import levy then they should be ready to be held accountable to the consequences of such action.

[mainpmf]

I agree with you. All carbon dioxide trees could absorb. The problem is that talking about the transition to alternative sources of energy while not forcing consumers of the forest to recover the amount.

Deforestation is actually one of the main reasons for global warming. 13,000,000 hectares of forests are cut down or burned every year, and most of this deforestation occurs in tropical countries such as Brazil, Peru, Indonesia (the current global leader in deforestation) and DRC.

Yup yup yup

Fact is that the best way to fight climate change would probably be to reduce the fossil fuels use AND to plant billions of hectares of forest.
But government can't plant trees AND finance wars. So we got our priorities...

[trollercoaster]

What's stopping you leftists from planting trees? Since you believe it is of such importance?

[frendsento]

I believe it is the responsibility of any sane government to protect its citizen and if there are no citizens, I am sure there wont be no government and if they want to continue to be in government, then they need to make sure the citizen will continue to live. In the case of global warming it is their job to regulate such because they are the ones that have the legitimacy to make the policies to make it happen. They fail to provide a good transportation system so we can buy enough cars then they can generate import levy then they should be ready to be held accountable to the consequences of such action.

I believe that the government should protect its citizen in all cost but not all issue should be pass on the government , lets say for example in global warming , global warming is already happening and there is no way the government cant stop it , but in anyway it could be prevented from getting worst , you and me as an individual can actually contribute to prevent global warming from becoming worst , let say by planting trees and any other eco friendly activities that could help the nature and it is not only the government job it is also ours !