Bitcoin Forum
July 22, 2018, 09:14:28 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Go home blockchain, you are drunk!  (Read 799 times)
Bytas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 323
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 08, 2013, 02:13:16 PM
 #1


So, i saw this very strange thing on blockchain.info, where the newer block is older than the one before it O.o
What am i seeing here, is this a typical example of a fork? or just the website being silly?
Any theories on this?

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1532294068
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532294068

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532294068
Reply with quote  #2

1532294068
Report to moderator
alexeft
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 08, 2013, 02:17:22 PM
 #2

I have seen it many times at blockchain.info but I don't know what it is. Perhaps a fork?
kerogre256
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 161
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 08, 2013, 02:26:20 PM
 #3

Yeh what happend here ? Can someon explain ?
Bytas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 323
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 08, 2013, 02:28:38 PM
 #4

Why is this topic moved? We didn't find out yet if this is a problem embedded in the blockchain.
Does this mean it's the site that fails? Some explanation might be nice :p
kerogre256
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 161
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 08, 2013, 02:31:00 PM
 #5

http://blockexplorer.com/ show it too ...
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1007

Newbie


View Profile
April 08, 2013, 04:37:12 PM
 #6

Relax guys. It's time written into a block. It can vary within 2 hour timeframe.
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1011



View Profile
April 08, 2013, 04:49:48 PM
 #7

Relax guys. It's time written into a block. It can vary within 2 hour timeframe.
Yup. Happens pretty often. I think Luke-Jr brought up a point (at least a year ago) where it could be problematic for some reason, but it wasn't anything major, IIRC.
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1370



View Profile
April 08, 2013, 11:06:10 PM
 #8

Not a fork.

Not problematic.

Happens often.

There can be no guarantee that every peer on the network has their clocks perfectly synchronized.  As such the protocol allows for some leeway in the timestamp that a miner places in the block that they solve.  This leeway can result in a newer block having an older timestamp then the block (or blocks) preceding it.  Since the blocks are ordered in the blockchain, this isn't a problem.  The fact that the block has the hash of the previous block in its header proves that it actually occurred after the previous block, and the peers are all happy with that proof.

Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1001


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile
April 09, 2013, 12:06:26 AM
 #9

Relax guys. It's time written into a block. It can vary within 2 hour timeframe.
Yup. Happens pretty often. I think Luke-Jr brought up a point (at least a year ago) where it could be problematic for some reason, but it wasn't anything major, IIRC.

Yea, nothing to see here just there there was nothing to see when InstaWallet was approached with an issue but assured everybody that everything was fine--then poof, they were gone.

I'm sure this is just a hiccup of some nature, but truly, truly needs to be addressed.

Full Disclosure (and hope I don't regret this): I truly like BlockChain.
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1370



View Profile
April 09, 2013, 12:26:02 AM
 #10

- snip -
Yea, nothing to see here just there there was nothing to see when InstaWallet was approached with an issue but assured everybody that everything was fine--then poof, they were gone.

I'm sure this is just a hiccup of some nature, but truly, truly needs to be addressed.
- snip -

Come on Phinnaues, you've been around long enough to know better.  I thought you had a better understanding of Bitcoin than that.  This has nothing to do with blockchain.info.  This is an artifact of the timestamp in "the blockchain".  I never expected you to be one to try and spread FUD.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!