Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 04:22:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Slush's pool payout glitch?  (Read 436 times)
dmphotog (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0



View Profile
April 08, 2013, 07:12:23 PM
 #1

Gramted, I'm new to this. But according to Slush's site, the payout formula is (25 BTC + block fees - 2% fee) * (shares found by user's workers) / (total shares in current round).

Can someone please check the math on this to see if it holds true to the formula?

Total Shares: 18833717   
My Shares: 1442   
My Reward: 0.00036229
Block# 230220   
Block Value: 25.58996000

By my math the reward should be closer to 0.0019

Thanks!
1714018923
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714018923

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714018923
Reply with quote  #2

1714018923
Report to moderator
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714018923
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714018923

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714018923
Reply with quote  #2

1714018923
Report to moderator
1714018923
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714018923

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714018923
Reply with quote  #2

1714018923
Report to moderator
1714018923
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714018923

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714018923
Reply with quote  #2

1714018923
Report to moderator
BrettBit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 08, 2013, 07:30:57 PM
 #2

Shares submitted most recently before the found block are paid at a much higher rate than shares found early in the shift. You probably had more shares in the earlier part of the shift than in the later part.
dmphotog (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0



View Profile
April 08, 2013, 07:34:14 PM
 #3

Sorry, but all of the other blocks have been coming in with good math except this one.  It is WAY off.  Besides, what you stated does not fit the formula that he is going by.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!