Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 03:55:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Namecoin better than Bitcoin?  (Read 4407 times)
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080



View Profile WWW
June 16, 2011, 08:17:04 AM
 #21

I was thinking, some minutes ago...

* Bitcoins don't have intrinsic value
* Namecoin do have an intrinsic value (they can be "bartered" with the "system" for a new domain/for renewing the domain)

Both can be traded between persons. Clearly the value of a domain isn't "fixed" but...

Nothing has intrinsic value. What you wanted to say is that namecoins has another use apart from bieng money while bitcoins can only be used as money.

The problem with Namecoin is that if it does become money its value will skyrockedt and it wont be used for domains, therefore rendering its porpouse useless. It could also cause a panic when people realize its original poropouse is lost.

Water has intrinsic value..food does...air...


1714146908
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714146908

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714146908
Reply with quote  #2

1714146908
Report to moderator
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714146908
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714146908

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714146908
Reply with quote  #2

1714146908
Report to moderator
1714146908
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714146908

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714146908
Reply with quote  #2

1714146908
Report to moderator
Stardust
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 17, 2011, 05:15:34 AM
 #22

What about highly sought-after domains, such as sex.bit? You are saying that you don't want a market where these domains are traded, because people shouldn't pay for them?  Then how do you propose to go about the allocation of sex.bit? by lottery? by decree from satoshi?  

Sure you can trade them, just like IRC channels, you could trade them for bitcoins, but when sex.xxx, sex.com, sex.net, sex.sex, sex.xes, sex.sexy, etc, are available there won't be much of a fight for them.
Stardust
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 17, 2011, 05:34:54 AM
 #23

The Domain Name System has to be hosted. In your proposal there's a lot of Top Level Domains to be hosted (where now there's relatively few). Who do you suggest is going to pay for that hosting?

Volunteers, just like free shells, IRC servers, Bittorrent, Bitcoin nodes, etc.  They can collect bitcoin donations for their contribution.
bitclown
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 17, 2011, 07:22:09 AM
 #24

With the current cost of name_firstupdate and NMC/BTC/USD rates, a .bit domain costs twice as much a .com domain. Keep pushing those prices, only the sky is the limit! Cheesy
ryepdx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 21, 2011, 11:40:33 PM
 #25

I don't agree with Namecoin.  People shouldn't have to pay or mine for domains. There should be a huge number of TLD, from .a to .zzzzzzz for example, and anyone should be able to register domains for free. Of course it would be better if DNS was decentralized and P2P.

There's going to be a cost somewhere, and mining for domains can be quite a bit cheaper than just buying them. Plus mining contributes to the network, so the people who are using Namecoin the most are the same people who are supporting it.

Mining is the cost you pay for a p2p, decentralized DNS.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!