Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 10:34:45 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Who are "The Other" 1+ thash/s ?  (Read 1649 times)
stellan0r
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Medical Translations for Bitcoins


View Profile
June 15, 2011, 11:53:40 AM
 #1

http://bitcoinwatch.com/

as you can see, right now we have more than 8.5thash/s. Way more than 10% is from "Others", which are growing fast since this morning. As this is before the difficulty change, I doubt it is a calculation error.
So does anyone know who or what has opened it's hashgates this morning? Smiley

Allgemeine Gesundheitsberatung gegen Bitcoin-Zahlung. Bei Fragen einfach eine PM schicken!
If you want to send a thank you: BTC "1PZJvKvarRviQRQWejpvXW2j4e1xbT8MZb" / Doge "DHtN2YEFg1obv2VFps8RwQSL6xL1RRYyXN"
1481020485
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481020485

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481020485
Reply with quote  #2

1481020485
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481020485
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481020485

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481020485
Reply with quote  #2

1481020485
Report to moderator
1481020485
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481020485

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481020485
Reply with quote  #2

1481020485
Report to moderator
inh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157


View Profile
June 15, 2011, 11:58:54 AM
 #2

Difficulty change screws up the stats. It happens every time, followed immediately by threads like this.

CAN WE PLEASE GET A STICKY ABOUT THIS!?

stellan0r
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Medical Translations for Bitcoins


View Profile
June 15, 2011, 12:06:23 PM
 #3

We did not have the diff change yet. Afterwards ok, but before?

Why does the overall hashrate calculation is messed up hours before a diff change?

Allgemeine Gesundheitsberatung gegen Bitcoin-Zahlung. Bei Fragen einfach eine PM schicken!
If you want to send a thank you: BTC "1PZJvKvarRviQRQWejpvXW2j4e1xbT8MZb" / Doge "DHtN2YEFg1obv2VFps8RwQSL6xL1RRYyXN"
kokojie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498



View Profile WWW
June 15, 2011, 01:07:52 PM
 #4

http://bitcoinwatch.com/

as you can see, right now we have more than 8.5thash/s. Way more than 10% is from "Others", which are growing fast since this morning. As this is before the difficulty change, I doubt it is a calculation error.
So does anyone know who or what has opened it's hashgates this morning? Smiley

bunch of smaller pools probably, like bitclockers.com, not represented on the graph.

If my post has been helpful, send me some love -> BTC: 1kokojUapmWqCqPw3Ch2rjcVh57tJEzka | PPC: PDyXAgA8eH47gokVW6zVZPSuu15aao5nZF | Bitshares: kokojie
My reputation
luffy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 606



View Profile
June 15, 2011, 01:17:49 PM
 #5

i guess goverments are starting to join. Eventually they will be the only ones left to mine since they don't "pay" power bills not even the rigs!
It is money from taxes Wink
Yeti
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112

Firstbits: 1yetiax


View Profile
June 15, 2011, 01:44:59 PM
 #6

You realize though that Bitcoin Watch is a couple of hundred blocks behind, which ruins the stats?
We have block 131,038 now and they show 130,815 as the last one. That totally throws off the hashrate. 1.6 Th/s is too low, Bitcoin Charts says it's more like 8.4 right now!

1YetiaXeuRzX9QJoQNUW84oX2EiXnHgp3 or http://payb.tc/yeti

Since Bitcoin Randomizer is dead, join the Bitcoin Pyramid (referrer id #203)! Be quick, be on top! Instant payout as soon as one of your referrals deposits!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!