I made 50+ posts over the last one week and you choose to pick those two particular posts to defend your claim and go to the extent of talking about a ban ? I'm disappointed. Those two posts would make a lot of sense if you've read them in the context rather than picking them out of context. Not every post has to be purposeful and full of quality.
I'm not going to analyze your whole post history. I'm not exactly sure why you are 'disappointed' with criticism. If you choose to ignore it, then you are more likely to run into trouble down the road later. You should also read this in case that you haven't done that already:
Signature Campaign Guidelines.
This is a "forum" and you "discuss" on a forum.
FYI you can "discuss" without participating in a signature campaign. At least in that case you aren't financially incentivized to spew out low quality posts.
I read and I write where it's necessary. I guess it's up to the signature campaigners to decide if I'm spamming. It's ok if they choose to exclude me. I'm here to share bitcoin experiences and knowledge. Signature campaign is only an add on, not the main purpose of this forum.
Take this as friendly advice. As a campaign manager: Had you joined Bitmixer, I would have most likely already banned you.
Anyhow, if this is resolved you should lock your thread. You can find the option to do so in the lower left corner of the screen: