neg trust sig camp

[Tyrantt]

Is there any signature campaign that allows members with neg trust, even if I've got it for some bullshit?

[1715163671]

1715163671

[1715163671]

1715163671

[1715163671]

1715163671

[Lauda]

There are no such campaigns that I'm aware of. You should look into the scamcoin altcoin section.
Regarding your ratings, see here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.msg16555262#msg16555262

[eddie13]

There are no such campaigns that I'm aware of. You should look into the scamcoin altcoin section.
Regarding your ratings, see here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.msg16555262#msg16555262

Seems you have lost your green and have gone negative yourself..

By The Roger Ver nonetheless..

[shorena]

Is there any signature campaign that allows members with neg trust, even if I've got it for some bullshit?

In my personal experience any campaign will allow you regardless of your ratings if you can argue why they should ignore the rating(s). In your case you would have to convice them that the rating is unjustified and that your post quality is sufficient for you to represent them (or the service the manager runs the campaign for).

There are no such campaigns that I'm aware of. You should look into the scamcoin altcoin section.
Regarding your ratings, see here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.msg16555262#msg16555262

Seems you have lost your green and have gone negative yourself..

By The Roger Ver nonetheless..

For one is the color really that important? The wording and the amount of the rating given to Lauda should tell you enough about the person. However this is probably not the thread to discuss this.

[Tyrantt]

I mean, I've got neg trust because I offered my account as a collateral and in my mind I was giving that account in order to get 10$ lended and when I was to get paid by the signature camp, with that account, I'd pay back but he took that account right away and I was left siht nothing. But ok.

[shorena]

I mean, I've got neg trust because I offered my account as a collateral

The rating states other reasons:

#1 signature spammer
#2 Defaulted on loan

and in my mind I was giving that account in order to get 10$ lended and when I was to get paid by the signature camp with that account I'd pay back, but he took that account right away and I was left siht nothing.

Your account is worth more than 10 USD in bitcoin, once you have paid back, your post quality is the only thing you need to worry about. Thats something campaign managers (should) judge anyway, so if you previously had a spot you might get one again.

But ok.

[senyorito123]

Is there any signature campaign that allows members with neg trust, even if I've got it for some bullshit?

i think you cannot join in sig who's paying with bitcoins since mostly campaign managers and site owners doesn't want their participant got bad trust score, its bad to their business to see that they are trusting those guys who made some fault in this furom, and i think the campaigns who you can join with are those altcoin campaign since they are not strict enough to accept those compromised members.

[bL4nkcode]

Is there any signature campaign that allows members with neg trust, even if I've got it for some bullshit?

All I know that signature accepts negative trusts users is in altcoin marketplace. And you can't find them on service section. Better to remove that first before joining.

[thebatletbet]

you can't join any signature campaign in payment use bitcoin
if altcoin signature campaign, several can acepted, but only few altcoin signature campaign accepted

you can find in marketpalced altcoin section, few altcoin siganture campaign accepted negaive trust

[raven7886]

I saw some altcoin ICO projects hiring Negative trust users. you better check their. you may get a slot their and earn some shit altcoins.

[crazyivan]

Defaulting on a loan is not something people running sig campaigns like to see. I personally would not follow you advice and would not click your signature link seeing you have that kind of trust rating. Maybe you should change you account and be smarter next time.

Good luck.

[bitbunnny]

Most signature campaigns, especialy good ones, don't like members with negative trust. You have to put yourself at their place, would you like that someone with bad trust promotes and advertises you? But maybe if this negative trust is unjustified maybe you could negotiate but still I wouldn't have much hope. The best would be to create a new account and start again, smart and carefuly.

[jseverson]

For now there are no signature campaign accepting member with negative trust but there are some altcoins campaign accepting with your account I think chronobank is accepting just give it a try.

[Cactushrt]

Nope. Signature campaigns are not allowing red trust members. Give a try to appy in altcoins campaign they are accepting members like you who have red trust. Next time be careful and try to read the thread before posting

[crazyivan]

As I ve said, he can make a new account. 300 posts is not that hard to reach if you re a useful member of this community. Completely different issue is why did he receive that warning and will he repeat that?

[Quickseller]

I mean, I've got neg trust because I offered my account as a collateral

The rating states other reasons:

#1 signature spammer

I do not think this is a good reason to leave negative trust. If someone is too much of a signature spammer, they will get banned by the forum administration. If the forum administration does not believe they should get banned, then a negative rating from someone who disagrees with the administration is not right.

#2 Defaulted on loan

From what I can tell, the lender of the loan had valuable collateral. It would be presumed that the lender sold the collateral after the loan was defaulted on. When a collateral loan is repaid, it is expected for the collateral to be returned to the borrower, but this would probably not be possible if the collateral was sold. It is generally reasonable to expect negative trust to be removed when a no collateral loan is repaid late, however as per above, repaying the loan would not be fair to the borrower because his collateral is already sold. If my presumption that collateral was provided to the lender, then I would call it even.

[jseverson]

As I ve said, he can make a new account. 300 posts is not that hard to reach if you re a useful member of this community. Completely different issue is why did he receive that warning and will he repeat that?

Yes he can make a new account and post 300 but reaching a senior account is another thing. He will wait approximately 8months for him to reach senior like his account now.

[bravehearth0319]

Is there any signature campaign that allows members with neg trust, even if I've got it for some bullshit?

In my experience here on bitcointalk.org, I never see any of the signature campaign that allows members with negative trust. And I know none of the ICO coin that are potential will never , ever accept the participants with neg.trust. I think the only thing that I can suggest to those member with that bad record in their profile much better for them to start again from the scratch, besides time is so fast.

[torry28]

Is there any signature campaign that allows members with neg trust, even if I've got it for some bullshit?

In my experience here on bitcointalk.org, I never see any of the signature campaign that allows members with negative trust. And I know none of the ICO coin that are potential will never , ever accept the participants with neg.trust. I think the only thing that I can suggest to those member with that bad record in their profile much better for them to start again from the scratch, besides time is so fast.

There were few actually, e.g Komodo Signature and Avatar Campaign | Campaign has ended and other alt coin campaigns. Ussually Alt coins signature campaign accept people even though their account already red tagged (They want recruit as many as they can).