Can someone push this Unconfirmed transaction?

[SmartIphone]

I have been stuck in a deal and seems that the number of unconfirmed transaction is very high.

The transaction that needs to be confirmed is this https://blockchain.info/tx/d83b29b81ad3a2e4d084dd583847cd87d278f3255a9301f74a668479aab13266

But I analyzed it and seemed the coins are from this address https://blockchain.info/address/1QLbGuc3WGKKKpLs4pBp9H6jiQ2MgPkXRp which has 9 unconfirmed transactions.

Is there any hope that the https://blockchain.info/tx/d83b29b81ad3a2e4d084dd583847cd87d278f3255a9301f74a668479aab13266 can be confirmed today/tomorrow?

I'm afraid that I'm getting scammed because I delivered the funds first

Edit: Tried to push it but gives me error!

[devans]

You were defrauded by amaclin. The transaction will never confirm. It's indirectly funded by an output from the address 1QLbGuc3WGKKKpLs4pBp9H6jiQ2MgPkXRp, which is associated with at least one other scheme of his.

Where did you arrange this trade and how did you pay?

[SmartIphone]

You were defrauded by amaclin. The transaction will never confirm. It's indirectly funded by an output from the address 1QLbGuc3WGKKKpLs4pBp9H6jiQ2MgPkXRp, which is associated with at least one other scheme of his.

Where did you arrange this trade and how did you pay?

Unfortunately, I had a deal through skype and don't know how we ended the deal but I saw that the number of unconfirmed transaction is very high.
I don't know that user so don't know if he is the same person I talked in skype.
Tried to push it but I'm getting this error:

Code:

There was an error pushing your transaction to network!

Did you sign your transaction? Is this double spend? Have you already sent this transaction?

[devans]

How did you pay?

[longbob72]

You were defrauded by amaclin. The transaction will never confirm. It's indirectly funded by an output from the address 1QLbGuc3WGKKKpLs4pBp9H6jiQ2MgPkXRp, which is associated with at least one other scheme of his.

Where did you arrange this trade and how did you pay?

Unfortunately, I had a deal through skype and don't know how we ended the deal but I saw that the number of unconfirmed transaction is very high.
I don't know that user so don't know if he is the same person I talked in skype.
Tried to push it but I'm getting this error:

Code:

There was an error pushing your transaction to network!

Did you sign your transaction? Is this double spend? Have you already sent this transaction?

Your transaction spends bitcoins from an unconfirmed transaction which is also spending bitcoins from another unconfirmed transaction. The second unconfirmed transaction is the one from amaclin's bitcoin doubler and it won't ever confirm because of the High-S value.

The transaction you posted could be from someone else.

[DannyHamilton]

You've been scammed.

There are 2 possibilities here.

1.  The person that sent you this transaction KNEW it was a scam and intentionally used this scam (which was created by amaclin) to steal from you.

2. The person that sent you this transaction was scammed by someone else and didn't realize it.  They then used the unconfirmed funds that they received and sent them to you (without realizing that they would never confirm).


If you are able to contact the person that sent you the transaction, let them know that the transaction they sent isn't confirming and that they will need to send a new transaction that doesn't spend unconfirmed bitcoins.

If you are unable to contact the persaon that sent you the transaction, then there is nothing you can do about it.  Learn from your mistake and, in the future, do not provide anything of value until the transaction has confirmed.

[amaclin]

and it won't ever confirm because of the High-S value.

wrong.
1) miners are able to confirm transactions with High-S values.
2) these transactions do not have High-S values.

[shorena]

and it won't ever confirm because of the High-S value.

wrong.
1) miners are able to confirm transactions with High-S values.
2) these transactions do not have High-S values.

Its not the BIP 68 version 1 thing either though. I tried to understand it yesterday but gave up after some time. Wana point me in the right direction?

[amaclin]

Its not the BIP 68 version 1 thing either though. I tried to understand it yesterday
but gave up after some time. Wana point me in the right direction?

LOL. you do not trust me (negative trust rating), but still asking 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1712580.msg17169416#msg17169416

[shorena]

Its not the BIP 68 version 1 thing either though. I tried to understand it yesterday
but gave up after some time. Wana point me in the right direction?

LOL. you do not trust me (negative trust rating), but still asking 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1712580.msg17169416#msg17169416

Thanks, I dont have to trust you in order to understand it, which I havent yet. Probably need to do it myself in order to fully get it. It also seems that my rating has little effect anyway.

[longbob72]

and it won't ever confirm because of the High-S value.

wrong.
1) miners are able to confirm transactions with High-S values.
2) these transactions do not have High-S values.

You're right. I should've tried to learn it fully and inspected the transaction thoroughly. Lesson learned.
Now please stop screwing with people. Can't you do your experiment without stealing people's money?

[achow101]

This topic has gone very off topic and has devolved into petty argument. It will now be locked and the offending posts deleted.