Alternative Coin Awards

[GethHead]

Hi All,

We are running a awards program for alternative coins called the Alties.

Below is a list of our Alternative Coin Awards:

Alt Coins

Best Alt Coin  – This award is given for the best all around alternative coin
Best New Alt Coin – This award is given for the best new alternative coin in the last year. The ICO must have been in 2016
Most improved Alt Coin – This award is given for the best alternative coin that has worked hard to improve itself (ie Hard Fork).
Best Proof of Work Coin – This award is given for the best proof of work coin.
Best Proof of Stake Coin – This award is given for the best proof of stake coin
Best Payments Coin – This award is given for the best coin that services the payments space.
Best Privacy Coin – This award is given for the best coin that provides the best privacy for transactions
Wallets

Best Desktop Wallet – This award is given for the best desktop wallet.
Best Mobile Wallet – This award is given for the best mobile wallet
Best Web Wallet – This award is given for the best web wallet
Best Hardware Wallet – This award is given for the best Hardware wallet
Exchange

Best Alternative Coin Exchange – This award is given for the best all around alternative coin exchange.

Applications close in 11days.

For more info visit http://altawards.net

[exscudo]

What is the point in participating for developers? Are there any prizes? And how will you prevent double-voting? The website doesn't look quite professional, to be honest.

[suphakrit2012]

In this way, it is not transparent and is not reliable.

[GethHead]

First of all, thanks for replying. The idea of the awards is to vet out the good quality coins and the 'pump and dumpers'. And recgnize those coins that have great products. I find that there is a lot of great technicians out there but the marketing isnt the best. The awards offer an opportuntiy to be recognized as a leader. The voting is really only 1/3 of the points for the selection. The audit of the wallets, if the roadmap is being followed, is the community active are also considered in the voting. I made the website myself and I am not a designer or tech but a marketing and sales person. It costs to hire good people as you must know. If our first year awards is a success we will upgrade the site but the more important piece is the audit of the products and the coin.

Feel free to ask more questions. Feedback is important.

[exscudo]

Can you specify who reviews the code? There are many different blockchains, so you'd need many different specialists for review. And such consultations cost really much.

[aioc]

This is just a scheme to make money,you'll have to deposit 0.01 Bitcoin

Why is there a 0.1 BTC to apply for an awards category?

We have asked for this small fee as there is a great deal of time and expense involved in collecting the data, reviewing the applicants and developing this awards program. Skilled and qualified people have to be compensated for their time and energy.

10 coins that's equal to 1 Bitcoin very clever idea,we can easily tell who is the winner in coinmarketcap and it's free

I would have believe in this one if a high rank member with a good knowledge in coding will run this venture
but I newbie c'mon after newbies this one. .

[btcdevil]

This is just a scheme to make money,you'll have to deposit 0.01 Bitcoin

Why is there a 0.1 BTC to apply for an awards category?

We have asked for this small fee as there is a great deal of time and expense involved in collecting the data, reviewing the applicants and developing this awards program. Skilled and qualified people have to be compensated for their time and energy.

10 coins that's equal to 1 Bitcoin very clever idea,we can easily tell who is the winner in coinmarketcap and it's free

I would have believe in this one if a high rank member with a good knowledge in coding will run this venture
but I newbie c'mon after newbies this one. .

It is very clear the the OP wanted to scam with the developer of ICO coins that is why he came of this idea but i dont think how will he find the details about the coin when started and running or not, like this their are so many details and the OP is newbie whose first post is this thread, like this newbies have always started thread and after some reply they just vanish away.

[robelneo]

The design of the site is very poor,the one who created this design is not innovative,if I am the dev of any coin I will not submit my coin for voting for the simple reason that I don't know his capability in looking on codes,if he cannot create a well designed site I cannot trust their judgement.

[GethHead]

Thanks everyone for your feedback.

Every journey starts with the first step. I have to start somewhere. As for the 0.1 BTC fee how can anyone review products for free? It is a small amount and ensures the vote isn't bought and can be audited well. I understand if you think its a scam. The whole crypto space is full of it. But there are good products out there so how can anyone know if there are no independent assessments? Will your coin just stay amongst your 200 coder friends and never grow beyond that or does it have the potential to be another bitcoin? In a sea of scams there are a few legitimate enterprises including this.

Anyway, I understand the skepticism and will put more work into bridging that gap. I am always available for a further chat. What can I do to make this award program go ahead? Tell me. I want to know.

[CraigWrightBTC]

The website is not too comfort if be accessed with smartphone, do you have plan to fixing it?
I think you must do it due to as new altcoins
 you must take the user or costumers for all of people ( include smartphone users) will become good coin
 for all of people on the countries.