Bitcoin Monitor - High-Altitude 'Snakes'

[TraderTimm]

I like keeping http://www.bitcoinmonitor.com/ open and looking at the transactions fly by. Been doing this for a few weeks. Recently noticed a high 'altitude' (it gets charted by how many bitcoins, so the higher you are - the larger the transaction), 'snakes' or trails of patterns that have lasted over two hours.

The pattern is quite interesting, starting below 9k then slowly arcing up past 10,000 BTC.

Here's a shot:



I have no idea what these repeating transactions mean, but I thought I'd put it out there for everyone to take a look.

Update: Could be simply coincidence, but the pattern stopped within minutes of my post... curiouser and curiouser...

[1714784978]

1714784978

[1714784978]

1714784978

[1714784978]

1714784978

[1714784978]

1714784978

[1714784978]

1714784978

[1714784978]

1714784978

[TraderTimm]

Just a quick update - 23:50 UTC the pattern has resumed.

Back to watching the 'skies'.

[k]

here is one of the addresses http://blockexplorer.com/a/97DZmCJ7mf

if you follow it back to here say http://blockexplorer.com/a/2QqrjStFBH, it's a 50000 block, then each subsequent transaction reducing it by a small (relatively) amount each time.

Not sure why?

[tymothy]

Maybe it's a means of moving and obscuring a large sub of bitcoins?

[phorensic]

Gotta be automated transfers of large funds by sites like Mt Gox.

[Prze_koles]

Someone is laundering money 

[bitcoinminer]

...or day trading with lots of BTC at their command... if you have a big enough block of BTC it is relatively easy to manipulate a market this small... Somebody buys 1,000 BTC and drives the price up a dollar or two, sells, and buys it when it bottoms out again.  Thats what that chart looks like to me.

[k]

...or day trading with lots of BTC at their command... if you have a big enough block of BTC it is relatively easy to manipulate a market this small... Somebody buys 1,000 BTC and drives the price up a dollar or two, sells, and buys it when it bottoms out again.  Thats what that chart looks like to me.

it's not a currency exchange though. just a transfer of btc from one address to another.

[xenon481]

Snakes on a Plane?

[NO_SLAVE]

Its old holders dumping blocks of BTC and trying to avoid crashing the market at the same time.
Ive suspected for two days this was happening and my guess is that MT.gox is assisting in the process.
A big holder said "I want out above 19", and now the system is being jobbed to make those trades slowly over these past days, and flatline the market.
My guess is that the order book is being jobbed, slipping the order of trades.  This "trading" is far from normal. 

[TraderTimm]

Its old holders dumping blocks of BTC and trying to avoid crashing the market at the same time.
Ive suspected for two days this was happening and my guess is that MT.gox is assisting in the process.
A big holder said "I want out above 19", and now the system is being jobbed to make those trades slowly over these past days, and flatline the market.
My guess is that the order book is being jobbed, slipping the order of trades.  This "trading" is far from normal. 

Just to be clear, the blue dots are peer-to-peer transactions, not exchange trades. Those are in red. So, someone is transferring to another wallet which may or may not be under their control. Given the volume, I'd guess they do own the destination since the pattern repeated so much.

I still have no idea why, there has to be a less visible way to go about it.

[Nescio]

Do the small amounts consist of amounts like 9.11? If so then it might be a hacker laundering or botnet syphoning (see 25k hack thread) - the latter should cause a large number of new panic threads of course, unless everyone is sleeping/unaware.

[Steve]

Or it could be someone drawing interesting patterns on bitcoin monitor to draw out the conspiracy theories. 

[DamienBlack]

Or it could be someone drawing interesting patterns on bitcoin monitor to draw out the conspiracy theories. 

That is an awesome idea. Would someone with enough bitcoins at their disposal write "you are all mine" in the bitcoin monitor?

[Jaime Frontero]

bruce wagner posted - a couple of days ago - about an acquaintance who was selling a "large" number of Bitcoin for cash only.  when he says "large", i interpret that to mean into six figures.

but cash only - so i'm figuring face-to-face transfer.  which would explain these odd patterns, the size of them, and why they represent wallet-to-wallet transactions.

[Mark Oates]

it looks like there's a rough correlation (green lines) with the production of blocks.

[Jaime Frontero]

it looks like there's a rough correlation (green lines) with the production of blocks.

true.

but how does a 50 BTC block correlate with a wallet transaction of 9,000 - 75,000 BTC?

[Mark Oates]

in the very-short-term, bitcoins reduce in scarcity as soon as a new block is created.

?

[lemonginger]

could be some automated scheme by which a big mining pool moved their money to a new wallet every time a block was found for security reasons. find block, payout, move balance.

[Horkabork]

it looks like there's a rough correlation (green lines) with the production of blocks.

true.

but how does a 50 BTC block correlate with a wallet transaction of 9,000 - 75,000 BTC?

Block creation corresponds with transaction confirmations, so it's possible that these assumed traders did swaps of one amount, divided up into 8 or more transactions, then waited for confirmation before continuing on the next set of swaps. I don't know why the sizes are as such, but it's possible that either it's a rounding thing, a cumulative effect of combining wallets before making a transfer, or just an artifact of how bitcoinmonitor.com displays transfers when multiple addresses are involved.

What I mean by "rounding" is as in the following: Say you want to sell 1,987,654 bitcoins. You and the buyer agree to do this with cash or some equivalent in 10 lots of 198,765 bitcoins and then wait for confirmation before continuing. But, rather than send them in one big chunk, you subdivide into round numbers and send transactions of 765, 1000x8, 10,000x9, and 100,000. Once those transactions are confirmed, you start over.

Why do this? Because when trading large amounts of small denominations, it's better to subdivide in case there's an error or some party tries to rip off the other. That way, you're only risking the lot size at any one time. The transaction sizes are just for convenience and ease of bookkeeping, like when you're counting cash in a till and you tally the numbers of each bill size separately.

What I mean by a "cumulative effect" is that it's possible that there was a few trades for, say, 10,000 and the recipient is receiving at multiple addresses and then consolidating these smaller trades at one address. In other words, the trade might have just been in lots of 80,000, but the buyer got 10k BTC, 10K BTC again at another address, and sent this to the first address. Now he has 20k in one spot. The same thing happens when with the next 20k BTC: 3 transactions appear for 10k. This happens until the buyer has all 80k. Then he consolidates these 20k wallets into 40k wallets. And two 40k wallets into one 80k wallet. Then a new block is found and he has confirmation on all these, so he and the seller start on the next lot.

In other words, even though we're seeing like 200k BTC in transfers for each block, it's really just the same 80k.

Or it's a dude who had 50 different wallets for safekeeping, following the "don't put your eggs in one basket" motto, and he's combining his wealth in order to make a trade.

Well, that's all just me guessing, but I hope someone more knowledgeable can come in here and set me straight.