bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 14, 2013, 04:54:48 PM Last edit: June 03, 2014, 06:45:03 AM by bitcoinreactor |
|
Opening a public terracoin p2pool, 0fee : statistics: http://pool.bitcoinreactor.com:9322/static/fee: 0 miner settings:login: your TRC payment address password: anything url: http://pool.bitcoinreactor.com:9322/ or stratum+tcp://pool.bitcoinreactor.com:9322 (prefer the stratum interface if your miner supports it ; you'll get better results) disclaimer:i take no responsibility for p2pool or TRC problems/bugs. Mine a few shares then double check your numbers Note to relatively big hashing farm owners :you can choose the difficulty exposed to your miner by appending something to your username (trc payment address) : yourPaymentAddress/+X where X is the choosen difficulty. UPDATE MAy 30th 2014: now running at 1%fee level, going directly to terracoin donation address (obtained from http://sourceforge.net/projects/terracoin/)
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 16, 2013, 02:50:34 PM |
|
updated to 0.1.3-36
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 28, 2013, 12:38:31 AM |
|
TRC node updated to 0.1.3-44 p2pool node updated with not-yet-released p2pool code from https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/pull/123 to support post 175k chain. (p2pool share chain was also reset in the process, to exclude shares from non-175038 chains).
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 28, 2013, 02:47:15 AM |
|
as opposed to existing p2pool installations until that code is released, this one works on current chain (the one still stuck at block 175038)
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
roy7
|
|
July 28, 2013, 03:06:25 AM |
|
Thank you for updating!
|
|
|
|
roy7
|
|
July 28, 2013, 02:23:08 PM |
|
The main p2pool is still on the old chain with about 50Gh of power, which is more than all the other pools combined. (Two big pools are suspended until the dust clears.) Really hope they upgrade main pool soon!
|
|
|
|
roy7
|
|
July 28, 2013, 03:24:00 PM |
|
Spoke to forrest on irc. He will try to clean that patch up and get it merged with official tree. However since p2pool is decentralized, miners need to upgrade their trc clients themselves. So that's a lot of wasted hash power we can't easily get upgraded. Doh!
|
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:19:28 AM Last edit: July 29, 2013, 03:04:46 AM by bitcoinreactor |
|
<reverse / website / ip> you're sending malformed shares, is your TRC node on the right chain ? what is your last TRC block seen? what's its hash ? will drop packets from your ip in a few moments if it continues. EDIT: ip and hostnames removed for anonymity reasons.
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:26:50 AM |
|
bitcoin.afoyi.com / http://cryptominer.org/ / 202.191.108.46 you're sending malformed shares, is your TRC node on the right chain ? what is your last TRC block seen? what's its hash ? will drop packets from your ip in a few moments if it continues. I've just updated to latest GIT HEAD versin of terracoind and patched p2pool with patch from https://github.com/terracoin/p2pool/commit/14b0b75a6aba00304390b7d09fbf6563181732fdIt's just caught up with the terracoin blockchain in the last 10 or so minutes, is it still sending bad shares? Edit: Last block is 175009 (0000000000033fb8ab001472177229afcba92c4e99681f6360adc444a0bc38b3)
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:28:34 AM |
|
seeing your p2pool graphs & stats, it looks like you did not reset your p2pool share chain, i guess that's why your p2pool tries to send "malformed" shares
or have you kept statistics, while resetting p2pool share chain prior to starting it?
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:29:47 AM |
|
seeing your p2pool graphs & stats, it looks like you did not reset your p2pool share chain, i guess that's why your p2pool tries to send "malformed" shares
Ah, let me do that now.
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:32:07 AM |
|
also note that this p2pool installation is fully "experimental" as code was not yet merged into p2pool by its author ; it may be rejected or heavily modified thus making the switch incompatible.
It's just a temporary measure to get a p2pool installation working on top of current TRC blockchain
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:32:57 AM |
|
seeing your p2pool graphs & stats, it looks like you did not reset your p2pool share chain, i guess that's why your p2pool tries to send "malformed" shares
Ah, let me do that now. Ok, that's been done, is it any better now? terracoind now has 175043 (0000000000001652281c106c8c234c8a61468f1646354b1c349a83b1ca85c250)
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:36:23 AM |
|
seeing your p2pool graphs & stats, it looks like you did not reset your p2pool share chain, i guess that's why your p2pool tries to send "malformed" shares
Ah, let me do that now. Ok, that's been done, is it any better now? looks quite good, thanks a lot sorry if my first post appeared 'aggressive', i wanted to keep this experiment as clean as possible, although probably quite temporary terracoind now has 175043 (0000000000001652281c106c8c234c8a61468f1646354b1c349a83b1ca85c250)
That's what i had for that block too, another one was apparently mined (175044) since, things may start to move again
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:38:53 AM |
|
looks quite good, thanks a lot sorry if my first post appeared 'aggressive', i wanted to keep this experiment as clean as possible, although probably quite temporary No worries
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
roy7
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:43:30 AM |
|
TRC finally got past the peak difficulty and is heading back down.
|
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:44:11 AM |
|
I do have to laugh at my rate versus the pool rate though: 2013-07-29 12:14:05.819491 P2Pool: 1279 shares in chain (1283 verified/1283 total) Peers: 2 (0 incoming) 2013-07-29 12:14:05.819817 Local: 1675MH/s in last 10.0 minutes Local dead on arrival: ~1.3% (0-4%) Expected time to share: 18.5 seconds 2013-07-29 12:14:05.820020 Shares: 71 (0 orphan, 6 dead) Stale rate: ~8.5% (3-18%) Efficiency: ~107.6% (97-113%) Current payout: 0.9669 TRC 2013-07-29 12:14:05.820229 Pool: 441MH/s Stale rate: 14.9% Expected time to block: 46.3 days
What time frame is that pool rate calculated over?
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:45:34 AM |
|
TRC finally got past the peak difficulty and is heading back down. i'm really affraid first "oscillations" will be quite big before smaller adjustments appears
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
bitcoinreactor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2013, 02:48:07 AM Last edit: July 29, 2013, 03:01:47 AM by bitcoinreactor |
|
I do have to laugh at my rate versus the pool rate though: 2013-07-29 12:14:05.819491 P2Pool: 1279 shares in chain (1283 verified/1283 total) Peers: 2 (0 incoming) 2013-07-29 12:14:05.819817 Local: 1675MH/s in last 10.0 minutes Local dead on arrival: ~1.3% (0-4%) Expected time to share: 18.5 seconds 2013-07-29 12:14:05.820020 Shares: 71 (0 orphan, 6 dead) Stale rate: ~8.5% (3-18%) Efficiency: ~107.6% (97-113%) Current payout: 0.9669 TRC 2013-07-29 12:14:05.820229 Pool: 441MH/s Stale rate: 14.9% Expected time to block: 46.3 days
What time frame is that pool rate calculated over? not sure, i've seen weird values too, it will grow relatively quickly, then will take way more time to decrease, p2pool probably prevent hoping this way. It also looks affected by number of peers somehow. Pool hashrate varied in a much bigger way with your new peer entering the game (decreased, that is. almost divided by 2).
|
BTC: 17CHqn3XE3Waf7Qfkm9p2MQE1VgB8gVbG4
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
July 29, 2013, 03:04:39 AM |
|
I do have to laugh at my rate versus the pool rate though: 2013-07-29 12:14:05.819491 P2Pool: 1279 shares in chain (1283 verified/1283 total) Peers: 2 (0 incoming) 2013-07-29 12:14:05.819817 Local: 1675MH/s in last 10.0 minutes Local dead on arrival: ~1.3% (0-4%) Expected time to share: 18.5 seconds 2013-07-29 12:14:05.820020 Shares: 71 (0 orphan, 6 dead) Stale rate: ~8.5% (3-18%) Efficiency: ~107.6% (97-113%) Current payout: 0.9669 TRC 2013-07-29 12:14:05.820229 Pool: 441MH/s Stale rate: 14.9% Expected time to block: 46.3 days
What time frame is that pool rate calculated over? not sure, i've seen weird values too, it will grow relatively quickly, then will take way more time to decrease, p2pool probably prevent hoping this way. It also looks affected by number of peers somehow. Pool hashrate varied in a much bigger way with your new peer entering the game (decreased, that is. almost divided by 2). Not sure what you mean by decreased by half?
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
|