Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 04:31:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bigger pools = better?  (Read 1336 times)
Chaosbubba (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2011, 04:35:15 AM
 #1

Just curious, i never bought any expensive rigs to mine on nor do i plan on it, all i plan on doing is updating to an AMD card instead of the Geoforce i have... my question is, right now i only run at 51 megahash, and im mining on bitcoinpool and have made .2 btc in about 3 days (horrible i know) would moving on to, say slosh's pool make me earn a little more? Or does the overall pool's ghash not really affect my small megahash?
1715272308
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715272308

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715272308
Reply with quote  #2

1715272308
Report to moderator
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715272308
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715272308

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715272308
Reply with quote  #2

1715272308
Report to moderator
1715272308
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715272308

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715272308
Reply with quote  #2

1715272308
Report to moderator
Auspician
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 103



View Profile
June 16, 2011, 05:21:21 AM
 #2

Bigger pools are not necessarily better or worse.  What they are is more consistent.  The larger the pool, the more regularly a block will be found, and thus the more regular of payments.  More important than this regularity is the pools fee - my primary pool is www.btcguild.com, which operates purely on member donations and is in the top 3 largest pools.  I used to mine with deepbit (the largest pool), but stopped after I decided the fees were too high.
NothinG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 16, 2011, 05:25:41 AM
 #3

I used to mine with deepbit (the largest pool), but stopped after I decided the fees were too high.
What do you mean the fees are too high?
Isn't it a 0% Proportional fee?

neneko
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2011, 05:26:43 AM
 #4

The pool size/speed doesn't directly affect your income that way. The bigger pool the quicker the pool will get a successful mine and split the profits so in a bigger pool your reward will be updated more often and you will have lower variance in it but you will get the same reward at average. This is disregarding the pool fee's of course.

What I'm trying to say is that a pool doesn't actually make you mine more bitcoins on average. With your hashrate it'd take you on average 834 days to get a hit. That would earn you 50 bitcoins. Most people aren't willing to wait almost two years to see any result so a pool is a good alternative. A pool combines all the processing power and yield results much faster but that doesn't give you more bitcoins. You'll still make 0.06 coins per day on average or 50 coins in 834 days.
fascistmuffin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
June 16, 2011, 05:29:20 AM
 #5

Deepbit has a 3% fee for the proportional.

The main thing big pool have going for them is uptime and payout consistency. At the moment I'm mining at deepbit because BTCGuild is having connection and scaling issues. When those are resolved I'll probably head back there.

With all the ddos attacks and scaling issues of the smaller pools, staying on a pool for more than a few days is rare for me.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!