FreedomEqualsRiches
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:48:15 PM |
|
if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The opinions of crazed folk who want to commit violence and are only prevented from doing so by threat of force is of no value here.
|
BTC: 1M7gCkPUQe76pAs4Ya6wM3ihqKHKA1TYB8 LTC: LYYC67qyVXnbvv11mYzcPREhVRgkmA8zz3
|
|
|
Rassah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:49:45 PM |
|
if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The state is people. People are either honest, or they are not. Thus you will either be in a state of honest people, or in a NAP community of honest people. The end result regarding feeling threatened will be the same.
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:51:25 PM |
|
if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The opinions of crazed folk who want to commit violence and are only prevented from doing so by threat of force is of no value here. +1
|
|
|
|
kokjo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:52:07 PM |
|
if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The opinions of crazed folk who want to commit violence and are only prevented from doing so by threat of force is of no value here. okay. go over in the corner and cry, because im a bad person. if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The state is people. People are either honest, or they are not. Thus you will either be in a state of honest people, or in a NAP community of honest people. The end result regarding feeling threatened will be the same. nope. the state are able to achieve a higher sense of honesty then the sum of its citizens.
|
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
kokjo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:53:28 PM |
|
if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The opinions of crazed folk who want to commit violence and are only prevented from doing so by threat of force is of no value here. +1 and i could say the exact same thing about you. you wants to give people a destructive amount of freedom, no good man.
|
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:54:38 PM |
|
if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The opinions of crazed folk who want to commit violence and are only prevented from doing so by threat of force is of no value here. okay. go over in the corner and cry, because im a bad person. No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
|
|
|
|
FreedomEqualsRiches
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:55:58 PM |
|
if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The opinions of crazed folk who want to commit violence and are only prevented from doing so by threat of force is of no value here. okay. go over in the corner and cry, because im a bad person. No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard. +10
|
BTC: 1M7gCkPUQe76pAs4Ya6wM3ihqKHKA1TYB8 LTC: LYYC67qyVXnbvv11mYzcPREhVRgkmA8zz3
|
|
|
kokjo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:57:29 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem)
|
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
FreedomEqualsRiches
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2013, 09:59:08 PM |
|
if i lived in a NAP based society i would feel that a gun was pressed against my head, while telling me that violence and threat of violence is bad. and that is hypocritical.
the state is at least honest about their use of violence.
The opinions of crazed folk who want to commit violence and are only prevented from doing so by threat of force is of no value here. +1 and i could say the exact same thing about you. you wants to give people a destructive amount of freedom, no good man. Should we report you to your beloved state cops before you commit an act of violence? After all, cops can't be everywhere, and when seconds count, cops are only minutes away. You are a danger to your fellow human, and should be locked up, by your own admission. PS. The word "Freedom" is obviously alien to your sickened world view.
|
BTC: 1M7gCkPUQe76pAs4Ya6wM3ihqKHKA1TYB8 LTC: LYYC67qyVXnbvv11mYzcPREhVRgkmA8zz3
|
|
|
FreedomEqualsRiches
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:02:01 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem) LOL. Who's crying in the corner now?
|
BTC: 1M7gCkPUQe76pAs4Ya6wM3ihqKHKA1TYB8 LTC: LYYC67qyVXnbvv11mYzcPREhVRgkmA8zz3
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:04:31 PM |
|
There is great joy in helping people, but no joy in doing it at gunpoint. but its not at gunpoint.
if you are saying that the state forces me at gunpoint to pay my taxes. i can say that you at gunpoint is forcing me to respect NAP. and they are therefor both equally bad.
yes he is telling you at gun point not to commit aggressive acts of violence against him. You really feel that this is not acceptable on the part of myrkul? You really dont believe that people have the right to use violence to defend themselves? I'm beginning to think you are a troll.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:06:47 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem) Argumentum ad hominem is insulting you as a means of argument. I'm not insulting you. I'm making an observation based on your previous statements. You're a bad person. An evil bastard. (The bastard part might be insult, I'm not certain of the marital state of your parents. You're definitely evil, though. Perhaps I should amend it to "evil asshole.")
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:11:32 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem) Argumentum ad hominem is insulting you as a means of argument. I'm not insulting you. I'm making an observation based on your previous statements. You're a bad person. An evil bastard. (The bastard part might be insult, I'm not certain of the marital state of your parents. You're definitely evil, though. Perhaps I should amend it to "evil asshole.") Evil people do not discuss ethics for its own sake. I don't think he is evil. Maybe a troll.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:15:38 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem) Argumentum ad hominem is insulting you as a means of argument. I'm not insulting you. I'm making an observation based on your previous statements. You're a bad person. An evil bastard. (The bastard part might be insult, I'm not certain of the marital state of your parents. You're definitely evil, though. Perhaps I should amend it to "evil asshole.") Evil people do not discuss ethics for its own sake. I don't think he is evil. Maybe a troll. Smart evil people don't. Because it reveals them for what they are. Intelligence is not an attribute I would ascribe to kokjo.
|
|
|
|
FreedomEqualsRiches
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:17:39 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem) Argumentum ad hominem is insulting you as a means of argument. I'm not insulting you. I'm making an observation based on your previous statements. You're a bad person. An evil bastard. (The bastard part might be insult, I'm not certain of the marital state of your parents. You're definitely evil, though. Perhaps I should amend it to "evil asshole.") Evil people do not discuss ethics for its own sake. I don't think he is evil. Maybe a troll. Tell that to Machiavelli (a man that I have a grudging respect for) or the Marquis du Sade.
|
BTC: 1M7gCkPUQe76pAs4Ya6wM3ihqKHKA1TYB8 LTC: LYYC67qyVXnbvv11mYzcPREhVRgkmA8zz3
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:21:57 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem) Argumentum ad hominem is insulting you as a means of argument. I'm not insulting you. I'm making an observation based on your previous statements. You're a bad person. An evil bastard. (The bastard part might be insult, I'm not certain of the marital state of your parents. You're definitely evil, though. Perhaps I should amend it to "evil asshole.") Evil people do not discuss ethics for its own sake. I don't think he is evil. Maybe a troll. Smart evil people don't. Because it reveals them for what they are. Intelligence is not an attribute I would ascribe to kokjo. no i just mean evil people are sociopath. For this reason they are unlikely to garner any gratification from discussing ethics for its own sake. They may discuss ethics with you as a means to achieving a self gratifying end, but not because they truly want to understand what is ethical and what is not. Since it is not at all clear how kokjo might be using this discussion as a means to achieving a particular selfish end I have to assume he is legitimately interested in the discussion. Which says to me that hes definitely a character and probably a little dim but not evil.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:24:42 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem) Argumentum ad hominem is insulting you as a means of argument. I'm not insulting you. I'm making an observation based on your previous statements. You're a bad person. An evil bastard. (The bastard part might be insult, I'm not certain of the marital state of your parents. You're definitely evil, though. Perhaps I should amend it to "evil asshole.") Evil people do not discuss ethics for its own sake. I don't think he is evil. Maybe a troll. Smart evil people don't. Because it reveals them for what they are. Intelligence is not an attribute I would ascribe to kokjo. no i just mean evil people are sociopath. For this reason they are unlikely to garner any gratification from discussing ethics for its own sake. They may discuss ethics with you as a means to achieving a self gratifying end, but not because they truly want to understand what is ethical and what is not. Since it is not at all clear how kokjo might be using this discussion as a means to achieving a particular selfish end I have to assume he is legitimately interested in the discussion. Which says to me that hes definitely a character and probably a little dim but not evil. You said it yourself. He's a troll. He's doing it for the lulz.
|
|
|
|
FreedomEqualsRiches
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2013, 10:26:17 PM |
|
No, nobody's going to be crying in a corner. Except maybe you. Because you are a bad person, and you should feel bad about that, you evil, parasitic, lazy, immoral bastard.
you too. (im soon gona hit the ignore button, nothing constructive is coming from you going ad hominem) Argumentum ad hominem is insulting you as a means of argument. I'm not insulting you. I'm making an observation based on your previous statements. You're a bad person. An evil bastard. (The bastard part might be insult, I'm not certain of the marital state of your parents. You're definitely evil, though. Perhaps I should amend it to "evil asshole.") Evil people do not discuss ethics for its own sake. I don't think he is evil. Maybe a troll. Smart evil people don't. Because it reveals them for what they are. Intelligence is not an attribute I would ascribe to kokjo. no i just mean evil people are sociopath. For this reason they are unlikely to garner any gratification from discussing ethics for its own sake. They may discuss ethics with you as a means to achieving a self gratifying end, but not because they truly want to understand what is ethical and what is not. Since it is not at all clear how kokjo might be using this discussion as a means to achieving a particular selfish end I have to assume he is legitimately interested in the discussion. Which says to me that hes definitely a character and probably a little dim but not evil. Did you not read his sociopathic screed about how he would commit violence unless prevented by force? Hmm, sociopath...socialist. Food for thought.
|
BTC: 1M7gCkPUQe76pAs4Ya6wM3ihqKHKA1TYB8 LTC: LYYC67qyVXnbvv11mYzcPREhVRgkmA8zz3
|
|
|
Rassah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
|
|
May 05, 2013, 11:18:37 PM |
|
The state is people. People are either honest, or they are not. Thus you will either be in a state of honest people, or in a NAP community of honest people. The end result regarding feeling threatened will be the same.
nope. the state are able to achieve a higher sense of honesty then the sum of its citizens. Um, the state is the sum of its citizens. Unless it's a dictatorship. But we're arguing about democracy, right?
|
|
|
|
FreedomEqualsRiches
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2013, 11:43:33 PM |
|
The state is people. People are either honest, or they are not. Thus you will either be in a state of honest people, or in a NAP community of honest people. The end result regarding feeling threatened will be the same.
nope. the state are able to achieve a higher sense of honesty then the sum of its citizens. Um, the state is the sum of its citizens. Unless it's a dictatorship. But we're arguing about democracy, right? Democracy is as flawed as any central command/control system, and seems to naturally tend towards socialism, no?
|
BTC: 1M7gCkPUQe76pAs4Ya6wM3ihqKHKA1TYB8 LTC: LYYC67qyVXnbvv11mYzcPREhVRgkmA8zz3
|
|
|
|