Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 07:59:16 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Could BTC ever become fast enough to function as a single world currency?  (Read 3700 times)
PovertyByte (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 05:43:10 AM
 #1

There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for. Is there any way that BTC could become fast enough to function as a single or primary international currency through further updates yet to be determined without upping the block size to 1 TB per block someday?
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:01:35 AM
 #2

There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for. Is there any way that BTC could become fast enough to function as a single or primary international currency through further updates yet to be determined without upping the block size to 1 TB per block someday?

Nope,

It's ONCHAIN transactions can not handle that demand,
plus as it's price rises so does it transaction fees, only the rich will be able to afford adding a transaction per block.
Mass adoption will fail and the rich will dump BTC in favor of other crypto that the masses can use.
BTC just does not have enough coins for worldwide adoption.

 Cool

davis196
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 918



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:24:33 AM
 #3

There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for. Is there any way that BTC could become fast enough to function as a single or primary international currency through further updates yet to be determined without upping the block size to 1 TB per block someday?

Nope,

It's ONCHAIN transactions can not handle that demand,
plus as it's price rises so does it transaction fees, only the rich will be able to afford adding a transaction per block.
Mass adoption will fail and the rich will dump BTC in favor of other crypto that the masses can use.
BTC just does not have enough coins for worldwide adoption.

 Cool



Enough coins?It`s not about the number or coins.It`s about the blockchain and how it works.
Maybe Satoshi Nakamoto created bitcoin with this in mind.
Btc should never become worldwide currency because ,one way or another,it will become more centralized and the fundamental concept of bitcoin will be destroyed.

Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:31:35 AM
 #4

There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for.
SegWit IS NOT the only improvement, LN and Sidechains (after segwit) give fiat and alts no chance
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:33:33 AM
 #5


Btc should never become worldwide currency because ,one way or another,it will become more centralized
more cetralized than what? fiat or alts?
Genesis1337
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2017, 06:35:33 AM
 #6

There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for.
SegWit IS NOT the only improvement, LN and Sidechains (after segwit) give fiat and alts no chance

aren't LN and sidechains 3rd party though? and has their technology been tested?

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:36:46 AM
 #7


BTC just does not have enough coins for worldwide adoption.

 Cool


Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:44:51 AM
 #8



aren't LN and sidechains 3rd party though? and has their technology been tested?
No, Bitcoin is an open source technology there's no 3rd party. Yes, before implementantion all upgrades is and will be completely and comprehensively tested, it's not layman's Unlimited fudged cookery
MadGamer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1031


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:48:00 AM
 #9

Why not ? Lightning network is always there whether SegWit gets implemented or not. LN should enable instant off-chain transfer of the ownership of bitcoin without the need of any third party , of course there should be enough LN nodes out there. I really doubt that bitcoin could become the primary international currency , not because It can't handle it but more because the banking system and governments won't allow that to happen.
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:52:05 AM
 #10

There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for.
SegWit IS NOT the only improvement, LN and Sidechains (after segwit) give fiat and alts no chance

An Alt will take BTC place as top coin within 4 years.  Wink
I told you just to upset you.


 Cool

FYI:
LN is offchain, you might as well just trust a bank.



Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:53:50 AM
 #11

Why not ? Lightning network is always there whether SegWit gets implemented or not. LN should enable instant off-chain transfer of the ownership of bitcoin without the need of any third party , of course there should be enough LN nodes out there. I really doubt that bitcoin could become the primary international currency , not because It can't handle it but more because the banking system and governments won't allow that to happen.
I doubt they could possibly do something with it  Cheesy
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 06:56:16 AM
 #12

Why not ? Lightning network is always there whether SegWit gets implemented or not. LN should enable instant off-chain transfer of the ownership of bitcoin without the need of any third party , of course there should be enough LN nodes out there. I really doubt that bitcoin could become the primary international currency , not because It can't handle it but more because the banking system and governments won't allow that to happen.
I doubt they could possibly do something with it  Cheesy

Outlawing it in their country would stop BTC cold.
Very few would go to jail over it.

 Cool
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:00:43 AM
 #13



An Alt will take BTC place as top coin within 4 years.  Wink
I told you just to upset you.

You can't upset anyone with lie  Wink. You think I didn't hear that? Do you know how many alt were there already? and where are they now?
Genesis1337
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2017, 07:02:29 AM
 #14



aren't LN and sidechains 3rd party though? and has their technology been tested?
No, Bitcoin is an open source technology there's no 3rd party. Yes, before implementantion all upgrades is and will be completely and comprehensively tested, it's not layman's Unlimited fudged cookery

yea, i just dont know how lightning network and all of that stuff works. i will have to look into it more

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:02:38 AM
 #15



An Alt will take BTC place as top coin within 4 years.  Wink
I told you just to upset you.

You can't upset anyone with lie  Wink. You think I didn't hear that? Do you know how many alt were there already? and where are they now?

I don't lie, that is your strategy not mine.  Smiley
Within 4 years.  Wink

 Cool
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:03:24 AM
 #16


Outlawing it in their country would stop BTC cold.
Very few would go to jail over it.

 Cool

I don't think it's possible to track everyone or we've already got rid of drugs and child porn and so on
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:04:21 AM
 #17


I don't lie,
you do
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:05:52 AM
 #18


LOL, you can tell what is truth , you're too much of a BTC Shrill.  Cheesy


 Cool
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:07:17 AM
 #19


Outlawing it in their country would stop BTC cold.
Very few would go to jail over it.

 Cool

I don't think it's possible to track everyone or we've already got rid of drugs and child porn and so on

All they have to do is Block companies from taking BTC and block banks from letting people exchange it for fiat.


 Cool
Viscount
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2017, 07:10:28 AM
 #20


LOL, you can tell what is truth , you're too much of a BTC Shrill.  Cheesy


 Cool
Read again your upper post that Bitcoin has not enough coins. Only a liar would write such stupid nonsence 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!