I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?

[IamNotAnonymous]

Recently I have noticed, the Bitcoin Talk Forum speaking about - Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? and why did he hide himself ? Few people saying, may be Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi but many do not believe it. Bitcoin Roundtable is probably planing to bring another new candidate to decorate  the throne of Bitcoin Kingdom but if they choose another Alpacino Makamoto this will become a nonsense drama again. The Bitcoin community leaders know who is the inventor of Bitcoin and blockchain technology. Now if the mystery of Bitcoin invention unfold to the media what can happen ? If another developer try to prove that he is the inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology signing a message with public key like Dr. Craig Wright with a big hope that he might get a Nobel Prize in economic science;  he will become another laughingstock. This types of nonsense is no longer interesting. Therefore the Bitcoin community leaders must pay attention to wisdom. There is no real excitement claiming inventory right of some one else' invention. That will be catagorised as stealing by the legal court of justice. If any one want to sit on the throne of true inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology he must know that it will only damage the reputation of Bitcoin community. No one or any group of developers can falsely claim the Bitcoin and Blockchain invention because the Chancellor knows who is Satoshi Nakamoto. Do you know who is Satoshi Nakamoto ?  Some of you may not want to know him because they already know him but for the fear of unknown they do not want to say that they know him. Fear not.  Tell the truth. It will end all the speculations and conspiracy theories. Extra ordinary claim does require a genuine proof with concrete evidence. if you want to be the next candidate of Bitcoinman you must bring your full evidence otherwise you will become another laughingstock. If any one really want to play the role better than Dr. Craig Wright you can contact me for assistance.

I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?

[1715233040]

1715233040

[1715233040]

1715233040

[1715233040]

1715233040

[Vaskiy]

I can't get what you're planning to mention in this thread. Simply described about few of the developers relating them with Satoshi. Finally have raised a question Am I anonymous?, it doesn't make any sense. Be clear with what you need to express.

[Patatas]

I can't get what you're planning to mention in this thread.

Maybe don't bother posting then ?

@OP : How did the Criag Wright drama end ? He ended up making a fool out of himself.By now ,the community is aware of the "Bitcoinman" trolls.Recently I heard an unborn featus claiming they invented bitcoin.Should that really affect the price of bitcoin ? lol
You mentioned about conspiracy theories? Who? Where ? That is blown out of proportions.

[danherbias07]

Why bother posting it here? Is that person that you are targeting here? Why use a newbie rank to post it?
It got me thinking somehow. Why are many of the threads here are made by newbies then they will be lost forever? Is this just for some troll or just to make users be enemies.
I really dont care who is satoshi anymore. He gave us a gift then we should just use it for now. Thinking about who he is will just make you crazy. Just like what happened to OP. Too much digging to the endless pit and forgot about being himself.

[pooya87]

facts:

• we don't have any proof that Craig Wright is Satoshi
• we don't have any proof that Craig Wright is not Satoshi
• he has been acting too shady and lied about many things, such as the signature he provided and the promise to move the coins but never did.

in other words any discussion about him being Satoshi or not is just pointless and wasting time. and it is mostly done by click-bait news sites and trolls wanting to waste time and possibly spread some FUD in the middle.

[Kakmakr]

I can't get what you're planning to mention in this thread. Simply described about few of the developers relating them with Satoshi. Finally have raised a question Am I anonymous?, it doesn't make any sense. Be clear with what you need to express.

What he is trying to say with a massive wall of text, is this : If you cannot bring concrete proof that you are Satoshi Nakamoto, just stop trying, to save yourself from the embarrassment. The community will scrutinize every claim you make, and if there is only 1 hole in your claim, they will discard the whole thing.

CW had many holes in his theory, and they ripped him a new poophole. ^smile^   

--== We are all, Satoshi Nakamoto ==--

[mobnepal]

This guy is creating lots of threads with long posts which looks like an article rather than a post. Also in every post he is asking others to contact him personally   

Craig wright is old news this days and nobody gonna believe him as satoshi nakamoto.

[megynacuna]

This guy is creating lots of threads with long posts which looks like an article rather than a post. Also in every post he is asking others to contact him personally   

Craig wright is old news this days and nobody gonna believe him as satoshi nakamoto.

Say that again, I just don't know what the heck is going on and people need to stop trying to be Satoshi and let's concentrate on making Bitcoin better. Fame kills, people! so don't rush for what you don't know.

[Jet Cash]

I don't know why you guys don't accept that Satoshi is not a person, it is a dominant family of computers. Bitcoin is part of their attempt to take over the world.

[NorrisK]

facts:

• we don't have any proof that Craig Wright is Satoshi
• we don't have any proof that Craig Wright is not Satoshi
• he has been acting too shady and lied about many things, such as the signature he provided and the promise to move the coins but never did.

in other words any discussion about him being Satoshi or not is just pointless and wasting time. and it is mostly done by click-bait news sites and trolls wanting to waste time and possibly spread some FUD in the middle.

The way he went about proofing that he was Satoshi was fishy from the start. That should've raised many more red flags in the bitcoin community.

I guess people simply need a leader to follow and were therefore blinded by the potential uprising.

[SONG GEET]

I don't know why you guys don't accept that Satoshi is not a person, it is a dominant family of computers. Bitcoin is part of their attempt to take over the world.

Quite an extraordinary claim, to take over the world really  

Satoshi may be a name of a group that have started working on bitcoin project as a test. But after they release bitcoin to public, investors and developers quickly get into bitcoin with high speculation. Than this group decide to remain anonymous to not make any panic among bitcoin investors.

[gredisgold88]

Recently I have noticed, the Bitcoin Talk Forum speaking about - Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? and why did he hide himself ? Few people saying, may be Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi but many do not believe it. Bitcoin Roundtable is probably planing to bring another new candidate to decorate  the throne of Bitcoin Kingdom but if they choose another Alpacino Makamoto this will become a nonsense drama again. The Bitcoin community leaders know who is the inventor of Bitcoin and blockchain technology. Now if the mystery of Bitcoin invention unfold to the media what can happen ? If another developer try to prove that he is the inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology signing a message with public key like Dr. Craig Wright with a big hope that he might get a Nobel Prize in economic science;  he will become another laughingstock. This types of nonsense is no longer interesting. Therefore the Bitcoin community leaders must pay attention to wisdom. There is no real excitement claiming inventory right of some one else' invention. That will be catagorised as stealing by the legal court of justice. If any one want to sit on the throne of true inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology he must know that it will only damage the reputation of Bitcoin community. No one or any group of developers can falsely claim the Bitcoin and Blockchain invention because the Chancellor knows who is Satoshi Nakamoto. Do you know who is Satoshi Nakamoto ?  Some of you may not want to know him because they already know him but for the fear of unknown they do not want to say that they know him. Fear not.  Tell the truth. It will end all the speculations and conspiracy theories. Extra ordinary claim does require a genuine proof with concrete evidence. if you want to be the next candidate of Bitcoinman you must bring your full evidence otherwise you will become another laughingstock. If any one really want to play the role better than Dr. Craig Wright you can contact me for assistance.

I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?

This is very funny, no anounymous in bitcoin, but in blockchain anounymous owned transactions, may I still ask you, why do you make this thread

[Xester]

In my opinion Satoshi Nakamoto is not a single individual but a group of persons who are into blockchain technology. They are not just an ordindary group but a group of programmers. Nobody can claim that he is Satoshi Nakamoto and it will never happen. Keeping the mystery behind Nakamoto is not the right issue that bitcoin must face. THe community must focus on strengthening bitcoin and increasing the blocksize.

[requester]

It's not clear what you are actually planning to mention in this post. And i am tired of hearing about fake Satoshi many a times. So can you people please stop acting role of Satoshi. He is anonymous and he wont come with pen paper and other evidence. If he wanted to show off himself then he might have long back but hr had kept himself hiddenb from the world. May be we have seen him but we font know that he is satoshi.

[panopotty]

If I was wright, the last thing I would want is to have to be dancing about in the face of the press.

He hash staff. He has law firms and this means he is spending money.

That oz company was paid out of administration cleanly without anyone knowing.

So, what scam. The only scam I see is managing to vanish - that looks to me as something he wanted.

from what I have heard, he has at least 50 staff. They are paid well enough to not talk. 50 people is 20 plus million a year

the patents are filed from one of the top firms in the UK from the little that is there. These are guys who do not get out of bed for less than a 6 figure sum
You cannot patent the blockchain, it has to be new - that is novel ideas

he has moved his companies (those he left) into a trust structure and has no easy links to them any more but the singapore one is audited annually and has a holding of just over 100,000 BTC. that is itself interesting
yet he is a fraud, so we just stoip looking?

wright did not recieve the money from the oz tax ppl - it was claimed as an offset, but he withdrew leaving it
the interesting part of this is that if he withdraws without the tax offset, he escapes australian capital gains.

when he left, btc was 300, now it is 1000
that means he managed to run with 70million gain and NO tax

wanting to be not considered satoshi means no capitral gains

he had 50 staff in oz
the records show that he paid 100 cents in the dollar.

this is all up over 100 million in staff costs alone
not from government
not from disgruntaled investors
PAID!

the biggest magic trick here is that we do not believe he did any of this, yet there are MANY ex staffers in oz and it is known there are many in the UK

the only silly thing here is how wright is just being left to do what he wants
I really do not think he gives a shit

[panopotty]

that author mentions Calvin Ayre

Ayre is a gambling and casino BILLIONAIRE

Casinos have a porblem
that is US players coming in and out and being paid.

Bitcoin is the PERFECT solution

wright has made himseklf look a joke publically.
What nobdy knows is that wright LIKES privacy

Wght designs online games
Poker.
Casinos.

Wright was doing this in the 90s

Wright was the one that managed the systems and security for Lasseters - the FIRST online casino

the trick with magic is to have people look away from where you want them to

The US puts people into jail for gambling operations

wright can still develop underground poker systems
payment systems in bitcoin
casinos
gambling

EVEN if the world thinks he is a fraud

because the ONLY part of the world HE cares about know what he does.

If you move money for casinos
if you code casinos that have US citizens using bitcoin

WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE IN THE MEDIA
or would you make yourself a public fool to be rich and powerful BEHIND the curtain....,

[zahra4577]

I think if Satoshi has to ever come out in public and expose himself, the first thing he would do is use his Account here on bitcointalk and declare it here before going to make it public.
Once he prove himself here that he is the real Satoshi,it wouldn't be difficult to convince others.

[panopotty]

who in their right mind would want to come out if they have money AND can get away with it.

i still think it a game to vanish.

wright used to design and code payment systems that avoided the US and poker lobbies and casinos....

what better way to kill off rumors

Poker - jail.
Wright would never have signed. he used to travel to vegas all the time
Travel to the US as he buddy arye cannot would be a result

[panopotty]

why the fuk would satoshi CARE about what those on our lsts thinK

Really!!!

if satoshi does a coupe - it is a war.
if wright is satoshi and he wants to out core, the LAST think will be to sign and have them know he is coming

add that toi his background and it is nonsense.

Wright is Ayre's IT guru

Ayre is a BILLIONARE casino mogil thta has escaped the US

wright does NOT want to be known!!!!!
wright STILL codes for the gaming and p[ayment industry!

NOBODY in the casino world who knows wright gave a crap about his media bs as it was over so fast

NOW nobdoy is looking into poker and casinos at ALL!

wright was suceessful - he beat you all!

[sir.humus]

I think if Satoshi has to ever come out in public and expose himself, the first thing he would do is use his Account here on bitcointalk and declare it here before going to make it public.
Once he prove himself here that he is the real Satoshi,it wouldn't be difficult to convince others.

How hard it might be to brake a user password in this forum?
If Satoshi will write her a message there will be someone to claim that it's not really him but somebody who take over his account.
I don't think anyone can prove that he's Satoshi, and IMO it doesn't really matter.