So tell me why he created all this drama,
first ignore this OP's fake evidence.. its fake.
to address the drama of craig wright.
years after bitcoin was created. craig wright found some PUBLIC KEYS on the blockchain. and pretended he owned them
he got a friend to draw up a trust fund, named the tulip trust. and wright (fraudulently) showed his friend these publickeys and said he owned them
naively the friend checked the balances. and seen the funds. (no privatekey/signature proof)
the friend got this trust notorised and insured for AUS $XXmill (though the tupip trust held no actual value).
this tulip trust was then used as collateral to garner business/investment. including AUS $54m from australian government in the form of tax grants.
in 2014, the australian government learned about bitcoin and started testing the legitimacy of the tulip trusts 'collateral' and noticed there was no actual proof of ownership.
craig knew the government wanted to summon him to court. so craig had to fabricate proof.
he 'tipped' himself off to gizmodo and other media. that "satoshi is craig wright". allowed them to do a media story but NDA'd them to not release it until he can flee the country..
craig fled australia and then the story(fake) broke.
months later craig tried to get more media to be 'tipped off' that he is satoshi. including inviting some devs and some british media.
again supplying no real proof but a signature that anyone can grab because that signature is publicly available from 2009
but the issue is that it only took hours to notice the signature is not new, but that old available data found on the blockchain in 2009.
motive:
craig was hoping the media stories and hoping no one would recognise the signature. so that he can have freedom from the australia government trying to grab him..
but for now he is still wanted by australian government. so remains hiding in the UK.
he is now desperate to patent things, write books, do exclusive news stories, garner more investments(ponzis). to fill up the tulip trust with real assets/funds to total the same value as the insured amount. hoping if he shows that the tulip trust now was $xxm of real assets/funds, they would leave him alone
