Bitcoin Forum
March 13, 2026, 10:18:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 35546 35547 35548 35549 35550 35551 35552 35553 35554 35555 35556 35557 35558 35559 35560 35561 35562 35563 35564 35565 35566 35567 35568 35569 35570 35571 35572 35573 35574 35575 35576 35577 35578 35579 35580 35581 35582 35583 35584 35585 35586 35587 35588 35589 35590 35591 35592 35593 35594 35595 [35596]
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26943917 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4788
Merit: 11603


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
Today at 05:37:59 PM

Lower highs… Failure to rise above $74K has confirmed the downtrend remains in tact… I’ll admit I got nervous for a second, but everything is still happening almost identically to the pattern we saw 4 years ago. If this continues, we will see another big drop in the next few weeks.


But wait there is more.

As long as Iran war goes on your idea is at risk.

BTC is the safest way to hold wealth for Iranian rich people and of course nations nearby.

So you need the war to end for your belief to come true.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4480
Merit: 6944


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
Today at 05:53:39 PM
Merited by goldkingcoiner (1)


I was merely summarizing the substantive contents of your previous post.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

You don't even recognize your own level of dumb when you see it in another format.   Tongue Tongue Tongue Tongue

 Wink


Yes.  We all make mistakes.  I will forgive you.   Kiss Kiss



I knew you had no peer reviewed papers Tongue

It's tough to find a peer reviewed paper when you have no peers. Smiley
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3178
Merit: 15346


“They have no clue”


View Profile
Today at 05:56:38 PM
Merited by philipma1957 (3), hisslyness (2), vapourminer (1), xhomerx10 (1), Hueristic (1), psycodad (1)

To the moon!



Massive bear trap still in play. Momentum is shifting to uber bullish. 1 vote away for clarity act, crypto bill underway. People don't know what's coming in 2026/2027.





A biblical up would work for me...
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2842
Merit: 2435


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 06:01:17 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4788
Merit: 11603


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
Today at 06:03:07 PM

To the moon!



Massive bear trap still in play. Momentum is shifting to uber bullish. 1 vote away for clarity act, crypto bill underway. People don't know what's coming in 2026/2027.





A biblical up would work for me...

yep Og better watch his step. As that trap will hurt.
hisslyness
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 875
Merit: 2309



View Profile
Today at 06:09:50 PM
Merited by El duderino_ (30), Hueristic (10), vapourminer (7), JayJuanGee (2), AlcoHoDL (1), goldkingcoiner (1), psycodad (1)


Think of it like this: Bitcoin on-chain is the gold bar; Bitcoin derivatives are the armored trucks and insurance policies. You need the bar for value, but you need the trucks to move the economy.


That’s a terrible analogy!! Gold trucks move gold. Bitcoin derivatives don’t move Bitcoin!

They create synthetic exposure, leverage, and extra risk. OnChain is the asset. Derivatives are just paper parasites feeding off price discovery and aiding market manipulation!.. Gotta stop with pushing this derivative shit here!
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4382
Merit: 14111


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
Today at 06:27:34 PM
Merited by Hueristic (10), AlcoHoDL (1), psycodad (1)



You are giving way too much credit to ethereum, as if it were a less shitty shitcoin as compared to some other shitcoin... and just for that, you deserve a virtual slappening.

 Angry Angry Angry Angry

To the moon!

Massive bear trap still in play. Momentum is shifting to uber bullish. 1 vote away for clarity act, crypto bill underway. People don't know what's coming in 2026/2027.

you are still my go-to pusher,
but taking a copy of the '21 pump graph with its original hight and moving it upwards on a logarithmic y-axis is a little bit too much cut in my Hopium ...
I mean 400k eoy... ?

if that's going to happen I will buy you a nice dinner..  (if I haven't had a boating accident until then)

Wow....  Shocked Shocked Shocked

An offer of a gift.

✂️
are you trolling?
why... what's so trollish about that?
obviously mEth and BTC are shown to be in the same class...
not realy....

Worse yet, trying to defend ur lil selfie.

Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4480
Merit: 6944


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
Today at 06:59:31 PM



You are giving way too much credit to ethereum, as if it were a less shitty shitcoin as compared to some other shitcoin... and just for that, you deserve a virtual slappening.

 Angry Angry Angry Angry

Haha, you lucky bastard!

You got 10 instead of 1, stupid "0" site always puts in for who know why!

I meant hisslys.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2842
Merit: 2435


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 07:01:14 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4312
Merit: 7337


I see the future because I'm crazy.


View Profile
Today at 07:02:59 PM
Last edit: Today at 07:31:24 PM by cAPSLOCK
Merited by JayJuanGee (1), Hottiek (1)


@cAPSLOCK - I understand what you're saying, but I do not believe Bitcoin derivatives would be all bad, all the time. I encourage you to open your mind to consider the argument in favor of derivatives...
   

While the creation of "Paper Bitcoin" can feel like a betrayal of Bitcoin's scarcity, derivatives aren't inherently "bad." In a mature financial system, they serve as the plumbing that allows big players (miners, institutions, and ETFs) to operate.

Think of it like this: Bitcoin on-chain is the gold bar; Bitcoin derivatives are the armored trucks and insurance policies. You need the bar for value, but you need the trucks to move the economy.

The "Good" Side of Derivatives - Despite the risks of synthetic supply, derivatives provide several critical benefits to the Bitcoin ecosystem:

Risk Management for Miners: Bitcoin miners have massive electricity bills paid in fiat. They use futures to "lock in" a price for the Bitcoin they haven't mined yet. This ensures they don't go bankrupt if the price crashes, keeping the network's security (hashrate) stable.

Reduced Volatility: By allowing traders to "short" (bet against) the price, derivatives prevent "bubbles" from getting too out of control. They act as a counterweight to irrational exuberance, leading to smoother price discovery over the long term.

Institutional "On-Ramp": Many large funds are legally forbidden from holding "physical" Bitcoin because of custody regulations. Cash-settled derivatives allow them to gain exposure to Bitcoin’s price without needing a digital wallet, bringing billions of dollars of liquidity into the space.

Yield Generation: Investors can use "covered calls" (an options strategy) to earn interest on their Bitcoin holdings. This makes Bitcoin a productive asset rather than just one that sits idle in a vault.




I appreciate your response.

And I agree with you that the institutional markets entering and building all their tools that they build to do the things they do has tremendous upside for Bitcoin's price, its image in the eyes of the investor, and so on.  And it has advantages in the area of taxability, security, custody, etc.

But every single one of these positives has trade-offs. And, in my opinion, the result is not really a net positive, but hold on, I have more.

This was inevitable. When Charlie Munger said what he said, I knew it was true. They would try to do this. It has to be done for the good reasons, but also for the control reasons, and the taming it reasons.  He picked that word carefully, and something tells me that man was not just riffing all that much.

But if Bitcoin can't survive this, or if this changes its trade-offs enough to defeat it, it will have been tragic.

Thing is, I don't see a way that that happens. I can see some pretty bumpy paths, but... The design of Bitcoin is very unique. There has never been an asset with its set of qualities before.

Every generation of Bitcoin investors has had to learn certain lessons the hard way.  Guys with hard drives and landfills who have spent years trying to find them because of the billions of dollars they could recover.

People who shoveled money into businesses like FTX and the other dozens of scams.

Bitcoin miner manufacturers that held back their products and mined forever and ever supposedly burning them in, making money like crazy and didn't ship the already paid for devices to their owners until they were not nearly as profitable.

The Silk Road.

Mtgox.

I think the professional investor class and governments and central banks and commercial bankers might be better at playing this game than the geeks and cryptographers and weed buyers,  and poker players have been. But I believe they may have their day as well. Their reckoning with the power of what this thing does, the kinds of freedoms it enables.

Some people are going to try to bend it to their advantage. And if you're going to come at the king, you better not miss.

It's good to see that the ETFs are buying again. This is interesting.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4382
Merit: 14111


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
Today at 07:39:03 PM
Merited by AlcoHoDL (1), Hottiek (1)

Real supply rally or short liquidity hunt?
My two cents:
Volume is turning green, but doesn't increase relatively to the past of this bear market phase (i'd say starting on October 26th EDIT:2025).
Which is showing similarities to the days before the drop after the (double) top in 2025.
I still give the probability that we had a cycle bottom yet no more than 0.2

Busy doing shitty stuff, lately.
EDIT2: Spot seems to come back slowly, though. Oh, and did i forget to say "Fuck Derivatives"?
OOM  - Don't you want Bitcoin to act more like gold? BTC derivatives (futures, options, ETFs) are designed to make Bitcoin act more like gold by increasing institutional access, enhancing liquidity, and potentially dampening extreme volatility.

Bitcoin is not like gold, it is approximately 1,000x better than gold, even if not currently reflected in the price, you dumbass.

Currently Bitcoin is acting more like a high-risk tech stock, diverging from gold's typical safe-haven role.

Bitcoin is being manipulated more through various paper products than it would need to be manipulated, and sure, bitcoin is for friends and enemies, and there are certain needs to accept that bitcoin is going to be attacked, yet we don't need to be sucking the dicks of our attackers.. even though you, BTCETFInvestor, seem to just love sucking the dicks of the financial institutions, the government and the status quo rich who are engaged in co-optation endeavors while telling you that it is "for your own good."

actually BTC is decoupling from the market
feb 5  59k     march 13 to 73k

market on feb 5 49k to 46.8k dow
nasdaq 22.5k feb 5
nasdaq 22.4k march 13

gold feb 5 4800
gold march 13 5091
silver price feb 5        78
silver price march 13  82

seems to me BTC has decoupled From all above
and has the biggest gain From feb 5 to March 13
this is a new bull run in the making due to Iran war with Trump

You are likely "calling it" too soon... even though you might be correct about the budding evidence of such a possibility.

By the way, don't get me wrong.  I have never been a great fan of proclamations that bitcoin is correlated to any of of the various segments of the market, even if there might be some short term evidence of such correlations and even likely attempts by status quo manipulators to both create the physical impression of correlation and to spout out such correlation talking point.

So in that sense, it likely simultaneously appropriate to proclaim that bitcoin "always has been" not correlated.



Huh?  How could that be pain, relatively speaking?

Earlier you had suggested that you were not selling any of your bitcoin, so you were going through pain based on your going from a higher state of profits (on paper) and then to a lower state of profits (on paper) and based on feeling stupid for not having had sold as your friends, family and perhaps other acquaintances were pointing at you and laughing because you could have had sold out at 40x-ish profits, but instead you were ONLY able to potentially sell in the ballpark of 6x profits..

That period was less painful to me, since I felt at that time that I was still more than 3x profits even at the lowest price points in that timeframe - even though there weren't really a loss of folks calling for $1,500 and even lower prices as if such level of dip "technically" "had to happen," and we later found out that such level of dip did not "have to happen."
I guess I never looked at it from a bot's view... The human in me was looking at lost potential profits, not how much I was currently up... Thinking you made the worst financial choice by not selling is the pain I am talking about.

Sure we all likely suffer a wee bit towards getting sucked into feelings of "loss aversion."

My friends were bad, but I beat myself up for being overinvested and wildly under... It worked out great in the end, and now, 10 years later, I say the pain is a lot less because I have started to only think about where we're at now, not where we were.

For sure.  Any of us who had ended up "overinvesting" into bitcoin ended up benefiting in stupendous ways by that potential error.

In several ways, I had considered myself in terms of being conservative in my bitcoin investing from late 2013 through late 2014 - yet at the same time, since the BTC price kept dropping so much through out 2014 and then staying down for so long through out 2015, my prior assessments of conservatism began to transform into feelings of having had over done it...  so many times, especially 2015, I had to ongoingly remind myself about my earlier assessment that I was not investing any more than I could have had afforded to lose, so in that regard, I had not overdone it, even though my overall holdings was taking a relatively large hit to be spending so much time being down into the territories of greater than 50% losses (meaning my holdings continued to be priced on the market at less than half the amount that I had put in).

If I had sold and missed out on buying back in, I would be 1000% worse off than I am now!!!

Not ONLY were the various internet websites (not excluding this here thread) were filled with bitcoin naysayers "advising" to cut looses, there was similar kinds of advice that I was receiving from various normies in the real world (not unsmart people) who seemed to know for sure that bitcopin was going to continue to go down.. even though we were spending quite a bit of time in the lower to mid $200s through an overwhelming large portion of 2015.

As I haven't sold much in the last 10 years, I did buy some extremely expensive (relative) items with my cornz before I realized how powerful they really were!

That was one mistake that I did not make... I tended to do spend and replace, even during the time periods (such as late 2017) in which it should have had been o.k. to shave off some "profits."

Also, hopefully my time-based withdrawal that I am currently fond of should last me till I am 90 before I am out of said cornz,

The way that I structure and theorized time-based withdrawal is that the supply never, ever, ever runs out since the dollar amount that is ongoingly being withdrawn is on average lower than the dollar amount that the BTC price (value) is appreciating.  So if you do it correctly, there should be absolutely no reason to run out of BTC, until such time that you might purposefully choose to deplete the principle (perhaps based on end of life type considerations or some other reasons that you might end up purposefully choosing to deplete your principle).  

I am not proclaiming that my ideas are always clear, but I have quite a bit of discussion of time-based sustainable withdrawal in my sustainable withdrawal thread.  In other words, you seem to have some different way of thinking about time-based withdrawal than me, and maybe that is why  you don't use the "sustainable" descriptor in what you proclaim that you are planning to do.

I will concede that even my own ways of talking about sustainable withdrawal (whether time based or price based) has changed since my late 2023 creation of my sustainable withdrawal thread.
 
and I have no kids to leave it to!

Surely can be a bit of a dilemma if there are concerns about if there might be any errors or reasons to still have assets at the time you croak.

I personally am not completely against ideas of dying on zero, yet at the same time, with bitcoin, there seems to be ways to really live in excess with enough and even more than what is needed, even while preserving the principle as a kind of insurance policy.. so I have some difficulties considering that dying with capital to necessarily be any kind of a major sacrifice of "additional funzies" that could have had taken place.
 
Also, you don't have to worry about the price so much, as even though I set up those sales, I don't have to execute them unless I need to acquire dirty fiat for another toy I really have to have!!!
 We all get our cornz at the price we deserve them at!
K

At a certain point, the question should not revolve too much around how much profits that we might have or not have, yet instead the extent to which we have enough (or more than enough) cornz to be able to shave off some of the cornz at any price that we like, even though surely there are likely disinclinations to sell very much bitcoin during periods like these when the correction in the ballpark of 40% or greater, yet at the same time, if we have enough or more than enough bitcoin, then the extent of our bitcoin price cushion  may well be a rounding error, since I can recall somewhere in 2019-ish telling myself that I am going to structure whatever that I do so that I am not selling any bitcoin below $5k and in that regard, if the BTC price goes below $5k, I am either buying more or just holding through the situation, to the extent that I don't have enough money to buy.

So in that sense, if I were to be in a similar mindset that I had justified in around 2019, then I should be able to appreciate that any additional BTC prices above $5k remains a form of icing on the cake, even if we might adjust the amount upwardly from time to time in order to account for the ongoing debasement of the dollar so $5k in 2019 may well be $10k or more right now, depending on how we might consider the ever-present debasement of the dollar (and other fiat currencies) issue.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2842
Merit: 2435


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 08:01:15 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
BitHodlers
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 129


View Profile
Today at 08:56:47 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

actually BTC is decoupling from the market
feb 5  59k     march 13 to 73k

market on feb 5 49k to 46.8k dow
nasdaq 22.5k feb 5
nasdaq 22.4k march 13

gold feb 5 4800
gold march 13 5091
silver price feb 5        78
silver price march 13  82

seems to me BTC has decoupled From all above
and has the biggest gain From feb 5 to March 13
this is a new bull run in the making due to Iran war with Trump

You are likely "calling it" too soon... even though you might be correct about the budding evidence of such a possibility.
Let's talk again about this decoupling when it goes back above $100k?  Smiley It seems like it is starting to decouple but it is definitely too early..
Ambatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1232


Don't tell anyone


View Profile WWW
Today at 08:59:03 PM

Lower highs… Failure to rise above $74K has confirmed the downtrend remains in tact… I’ll admit I got nervous for a second, but everything is still happening almost identically to the pattern we saw 4 years ago. If this continues, we will see another big drop in the next few weeks.
So you saying LFC_Bitcoin won't even get up to $70 from me.
I hated when we were in $90K Now I'm yearning for it
Life something's tend to reduce our standard  Undecided
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2842
Merit: 2435


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 09:01:24 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
BTCETFInvestor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 61

Toodaloo! ..-. ..- -.-. -.- / -.-- --- ..-


View Profile
Today at 09:08:22 PM
Last edit: Today at 10:13:14 PM by BTCETFInvestor


@cAPSLOCK - I understand what you're saying, but I do not believe Bitcoin derivatives would be all bad, all the time. I encourage you to open your mind to consider the argument in favor of derivatives...
  

While the creation of "Paper Bitcoin" can feel like a betrayal of Bitcoin's scarcity, derivatives aren't inherently "bad." In a mature financial system, they serve as the plumbing that allows big players (miners, institutions, and ETFs) to operate.

Think of it like this: Bitcoin on-chain is the gold bar; Bitcoin derivatives are the armored trucks and insurance policies. You need the bar for value, but you need the trucks to move the economy.

The "Good" Side of Derivatives - Despite the risks of synthetic supply, derivatives provide several critical benefits to the Bitcoin ecosystem:

Risk Management for Miners: Bitcoin miners have massive electricity bills paid in fiat. They use futures to "lock in" a price for the Bitcoin they haven't mined yet. This ensures they don't go bankrupt if the price crashes, keeping the network's security (hashrate) stable.

Reduced Volatility: By allowing traders to "short" (bet against) the price, derivatives prevent "bubbles" from getting too out of control. They act as a counterweight to irrational exuberance, leading to smoother price discovery over the long term.

Institutional "On-Ramp": Many large funds are legally forbidden from holding "physical" Bitcoin because of custody regulations. Cash-settled derivatives allow them to gain exposure to Bitcoin’s price without needing a digital wallet, bringing billions of dollars of liquidity into the space.

Yield Generation: Investors can use "covered calls" (an options strategy) to earn interest on their Bitcoin holdings. This makes Bitcoin a productive asset rather than just one that sits idle in a vault.




I appreciate your response.

And I agree with you that the institutional markets entering and building all their tools that they build to do the things they do has tremendous upside for Bitcoin's price, its image in the eyes of the investor, and so on.  And it has advantages in the area of taxability, security, custody, etc.

But every single one of these positives has trade-offs. And, in my opinion, the result is not really a net positive, but hold on, I have more.

This was inevitable. When Charlie Munger said what he said, I knew it was true. They would try to do this. It has to be done for the good reasons, but also for the control reasons, and the taming it reasons.  He picked that word carefully, and something tells me that man was not just riffing all that much.

But if Bitcoin can't survive this, or if this changes its trade-offs enough to defeat it, it will have been tragic.

Thing is, I don't see a way that that happens. I can see some pretty bumpy paths, but... The design of Bitcoin is very unique. There has never been an asset with its set of qualities before.

Every generation of Bitcoin investors has had to learn certain lessons the hard way.  Guys with hard drives and landfills who have spent years trying to find them because of the billions of dollars they could recover.

People who shoveled money into businesses like FTX and the other dozens of scams.

Bitcoin miner manufacturers that held back their products and mined forever and ever supposedly burning them in, making money like crazy and didn't ship the already paid for devices to their owners until they were not nearly as profitable.

The Silk Road.

Mtgox.

I think the professional investor class and governments and central banks and commercial bankers might be better at playing this game than the geeks and cryptographers and weed buyers,  and poker players have been. But I believe they may have their day as well. Their reckoning with the power of what this thing does, the kinds of freedoms it enables.

Some people are going to try to bend it to their advantage. And if you're going to come at the king, you better not miss.

It's good to see that the ETFs are buying again. This is interesting.

@cAPSLOCK - I appreciate the exchange.

As you probably know, Sen. Thom Tillis of NC is on the Banking Committee and with the Clarity Act passing in his lap, he is dealing with the idea that instead of banning all yield (as the banks want) or allowing all yield (as Coinbase wants) - Tillis is looking at language that only allows rewards for active use in order to pass the Clarity Act

Sen. Tillis has been a holdout for the Clarity Act to protect small banks from losing savings accounts they are afraid will go to cryptocurrency accounts that pay interest. Tillis actually wants the Clarity Act to pass so he is working hard on a middle‑ground approach that aligns closely with what is being described as a bill that doesn't allow passive interest for simply holding a stablecoin, but allowing rewards tied to active use.

Tillis is certain to promote the idea that you wouldn't get interest just for holding a stablecoin (like a savings account), but you could earn rewards for using it in payments, transfers, or providing liquidity in DeFi.

This aligns somewhat with the debate about Bitcoin derivatives. Sooner or later Bitcoin and other crypto will be entering the frayed edges of how fiat is dealt with.  Like it, or not...  In that regard, a close real‑world parallel to this likely end result model that will allow passing of the Clarity Act for which there will be "no passive interest, but rewards for active use” is bank credit card rewards. It captures the same core idea in that you don’t earn anything for simply holding the asset, but you do earn something when you use it.

I think credit card cash‑back rewards mirror the structure that Sen. Tillis is likely to push through in order to pass the Clarity Act. You don’t earn yield for having an unused credit card sitting in your wallet. You only earn rewards when you actively use it - making payments, transactions, or participating in certain programs. The rewards are framed as incentives for activity, not as interest on a balance. This could definitely propel Bitcoin's use as payment, which is it's prime purpose... I would think that would provide a catapult effect for Bitcoin. How people accept the proposition of direct ownership and all that goes with it remains to be seen...  


philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4788
Merit: 11603


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
Today at 09:31:22 PM

actually BTC is decoupling from the market
feb 5  59k     march 13 to 73k

market on feb 5 49k to 46.8k dow
nasdaq 22.5k feb 5
nasdaq 22.4k march 13

gold feb 5 4800
gold march 13 5091
silver price feb 5        78
silver price march 13  82

seems to me BTC has decoupled From all above
and has the biggest gain From feb 5 to March 13
this is a new bull run in the making due to Iran war with Trump

You are likely "calling it" too soon... even though you might be correct about the budding evidence of such a possibility.
Let's talk again about this decoupling when it goes back above $100k?  Smiley It seems like it is starting to decouple but it is definitely too early..

okay works for me
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2842
Merit: 2435


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 10:01:14 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4382
Merit: 14111


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
Today at 10:14:29 PM

[edited out]
Are you familiar with Charlie Munger's famous quote concerning Bitcoin? I believe it was the same time he referred to it as rat poison.  But the part I'm talking about is something along the lines of he didn't think it would be a success, but if it was they would "tame" it.

I hate to be that guy in regards to "technically," yet you are getting your rich-guy bitcoin haters (co-opters) mixed up.

Essentially, Warren Buffet was famous for proclaiming bitcoin to be Rat poison squared in around May of 2018

In around November 2017, CME Group chairman Leo Melamed proclaimed that their goal in introducing future/derivatives was to "tame bitcoin."

In May 2018, Munger suggested that there was some immorality in being involved in bitcoin, and he compared bitcoin involvement to the kind of immorality that would be present in the trading of freshly harvested baby brains.

#just_attempting_to_clarify_richguy/BitcoinNaysaying_attributions

I was merely summarizing the substantive contents of your previous post.
 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

You don't even recognize your own level of dumb when you see it in another format.   Tongue Tongue Tongue Tongue
 Wink

Yes.  We all make mistakes.  I will forgive you.   Kiss Kiss

I knew you had no peer reviewed papers Tongue
It's tough to find a peer reviewed paper when you have no peers. Smiley

The label might not be described as "peers," but relationships might still come into existence.

>>>>Google finds that AI agents learn to cooperate when trained against unpredictable opponents<<<<


You are giving way too much credit to ethereum, as if it were a less shitty shitcoin as compared to some other shitcoin... and just for that, you deserve a virtual slappening.
 Angry Angry Angry Angry
Haha, you lucky bastard!
You got 10 instead of 1, stupid "0" site always puts in for who know why!
I meant hisslys.

Hahahahahaha

I have suffered from the "auto-fill" from time to time, too... I mean that I had done the sending  part rather than the receiving part.. so yeah.. good Karma on Friday the 13th, no? 

Thanks for the windfall, even if you did not send it "with love." 

That's O.k.. I heard that "we" are not supposed to be getting overly emotional in these here parts, anyhow.
Pages: « 1 ... 35546 35547 35548 35549 35550 35551 35552 35553 35554 35555 35556 35557 35558 35559 35560 35561 35562 35563 35564 35565 35566 35567 35568 35569 35570 35571 35572 35573 35574 35575 35576 35577 35578 35579 35580 35581 35582 35583 35584 35585 35586 35587 35588 35589 35590 35591 35592 35593 35594 35595 [35596]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!