Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 10:56:17 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin can only be a gold 2.0, nothing more  (Read 1077 times)
Mometaskers
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 584



View Profile
February 17, 2017, 09:24:40 PM
 #21

You can't rush sell gold bullion. You can quickly encash bitcoin if needed. Even jewelries are easier to convert to cash in case of an emergency. It is also way easier to acquire and hold compared to gold. I'm not dissing gold though, IMHO anyone who can afford gold should probably buy some of it, it's just bitcoin is more, um, fluid as compared to precious metals. You can use bitcoin to store your savings while also being able to use it to buy pizza or cake.
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714820177
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714820177

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714820177
Reply with quote  #2

1714820177
Report to moderator
1714820177
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714820177

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714820177
Reply with quote  #2

1714820177
Report to moderator
1714820177
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714820177

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714820177
Reply with quote  #2

1714820177
Report to moderator
eternalgloom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1283



View Profile WWW
February 17, 2017, 11:07:55 PM
 #22

I see what you're saying and I partially agree with you, but it's not too late for change.
It's still possible that there will be new features to Bitcoin that make it viable as a payment method or currency.

And I certainly hope that's will be the case.

_nur
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 17, 2017, 11:09:18 PM
 #23

no bitcoin will never be gold 2.0

bitcoin is bitcoin,gold is gold... duh
Hydrogen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441



View Profile
February 19, 2017, 05:40:40 AM
 #24

Wire transfers will soon become obsolete

If you need instant payments you may want to use card-to-card transfers which are as instant as it gets. You may have to pay a fee but with wire transfers you have to pay almost the same fee anyway, so it doesn't make any significant difference. On the other hand, Bitcoin transaction fees are growing in dollar terms quite in line with Bitcoin price itself, therefore the fees may be quite comparable in size to fiat transfers unless you are transferring dizens of bitcoins, of course. But in the latter case the fiat fees will be likely limited as well

I question whether instant payments are mission critical issues and whether they deserve high priority status.

If it is true that people deliberately spam bitcoin transactions with low transfer fees to sabotage legitimate bitcoin transactions.

It could naturally follow that these forums are spammed by people who exaggerate the importance of instant payments to give us the false notion that instant payments are a critical issue in need of attention.

To some degree bitcoin's transaction speed could be a factor of its security features the same way encrypted wifi connections are generally slower the more secure they are.

If that is true, there could be some social engineering at work in terms of people investing a good deal of time and effort into exaggerating the need for instant bitcoin transactions, possibly to push for bitcoin's security features being relaxed in order to suit some agenda.

It makes zero difference to me if bitcoin transactions are instant or take time to confirm.

I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of bitcoin users were indifferent to the time it takes for btc to confirm transactions.
Imaginary Entity (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2017, 09:56:22 AM
 #25

Wire transfers will soon become obsolete

If you need instant payments you may want to use card-to-card transfers which are as instant as it gets. You may have to pay a fee but with wire transfers you have to pay almost the same fee anyway, so it doesn't make any significant difference. On the other hand, Bitcoin transaction fees are growing in dollar terms quite in line with Bitcoin price itself, therefore the fees may be quite comparable in size to fiat transfers unless you are transferring dizens of bitcoins, of course. But in the latter case the fiat fees will be likely limited as well

I question whether instant payments are mission critical issues and whether they deserve high priority status.

If it is true that people deliberately spam bitcoin transactions with low transfer fees to sabotage legitimate bitcoin transactions.

It could naturally follow that these forums are spammed by people who exaggerate the importance of instant payments to give us the false notion that instant payments are a critical issue in need of attention.

To some degree bitcoin's transaction speed could be a factor of its security features the same way encrypted wifi connections are generally slower the more secure they are.

If that is true, there could be some social engineering at work in terms of people investing a good deal of time and effort into exaggerating the need for instant bitcoin transactions, possibly to push for bitcoin's security features being relaxed in order to suit some agenda.

It makes zero difference to me if bitcoin transactions are instant or take time to confirm.

I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of bitcoin users were indifferent to the time it takes for btc to confirm transactions.



Thanks for your comment.
I'd just like to say that I'm not sponsored and don't believe I've been swayed into one side of the BigBlock/SmallBlock debate.

My reasons for wanting 'as frictionless/cheap as possible' transactions is totally selfish and personal. I envisaged Bitcoin to be a way in which we/I could vote with our money. Being able to  quickly and with minimal effort change our 'vote', therefore having maximum control over the vote that we have.
To me, investing is like giving something my seal-of-approval. I invest in a project/asset because I believe in its values or its importance but the only way to invest currently is on a big-scale, paying through a 3rd party service.

I'd like to see micro-investing in diverse/decentralized things a possibility (<$10) - without the fees cutting into it to much.


Maybe Bitcoin adds more value to the world as a 'store of value and marker of property' for troubled people and regions and not as a cheap, micro-payment system system for the more wealthy?

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!