BTCLovingDude (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1010
BTC to the moon is inevitable...
|
|
February 19, 2017, 08:45:59 AM |
|
Blocks usually contain 2000+ transactions to reach the max size (999ish aka 1 MB) but lately, mostly today i have been seeing much smaller number of transactions. i don't know how frequent this is though! examples (all are full blocks): Height #tx 453742 576 453742 546 453730 829 453720 114453719 910
|
--looking for signature--
|
|
|
Xiaoxiao
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
The Golden Rule Rules
|
|
February 19, 2017, 09:11:39 AM |
|
I was a bit confused when I saw the total TX number for the last 24 hours on blockchain earlier which was around 300k and that does seem extremely low. Perhaps it's the middle of the weekend and that's why.
|
|
|
|
BTCLovingDude (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1010
BTC to the moon is inevitable...
|
|
February 19, 2017, 09:38:01 AM |
|
I was a bit confused when I saw the total TX number for the last 24 hours on blockchain earlier which was around 300k and that does seem extremely low. Perhaps it's the middle of the weekend and that's why.
i am not talking about number of transactions. i am talking about "size of each transaction" which seems to have grown lately. in other words transactions, instead of being 250 byte to 500 byte are 2000 bytes and more. if you check a couple of those blocks you can see these gigantic transactions with 4400 and 5500 bytes each and more.
|
--looking for signature--
|
|
|
1Referee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
|
|
February 19, 2017, 12:41:35 PM |
|
It's due to pools paying out their miners, where they prioritize these payouts to their miners over the regular transactions. Nothing really special about it. Just look at this transaction -> fac94e5fbcd7b50e6e82668eb6c599fb0723e7cd1d136422121a5d33d9a8bc75 It has no fee included because the pool in question takes care of making sure it gets confirmed.
|
|
|
|
7788bitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1023
|
|
February 19, 2017, 01:29:23 PM |
|
To me this is not unusual.
Perhaps someone/organisation is doing some consolidation of their tiny wallet inputs these few days? Or perhaps these transactions were of very low priority (due to low fee vs tx size) and only gets confirmed until the not so busy weekends...
|
|
|
|
|
1Referee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
|
|
February 19, 2017, 03:00:17 PM |
|
I quickly browsed through the addresses connected to these transactions, and to me it seems that they are related to faucets for the most part, and smaller gambling sites. In general, these dusty transactions are block fillers. If you combine plenty of these in one single transaction and send it to another address, then you get such insanely high byte sizes.
|
|
|
|
Kprawn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
|
|
February 19, 2017, 06:35:52 PM |
|
I quickly browsed through the addresses connected to these transactions, and to me it seems that they are related to faucets for the most part, and smaller gambling sites. In general, these dusty transactions are block fillers. If you combine plenty of these in one single transaction and send it to another address, then you get such insanely high byte sizes.
Faucets usually pay out on a Saturday or a Sunday, which might explain these transactions. I know some of the bigger faucets have their payment runs at the end of each week. You will also find some gambling sites that are sending out raffle winnings at the end of each week or sending payments to "offline" storage.
|
|
|
|
Senor.Bla
|
|
February 19, 2017, 07:46:22 PM |
|
As i understand it, this is what happens if you have many UTXOs (Unspent Transaction Output) and want to spend them in one transaction. What happens often when moving many small amounts. This makes it necessary to move some data hence the big size. As to why someone would want to transfer many small amounts i see numerous reasons.
|
|
|
|
mrkevio
|
|
February 19, 2017, 09:45:01 PM |
|
I was a bit confused when I saw the total TX number for the last 24 hours on blockchain earlier which was around 300k and that does seem extremely low. Perhaps it's the middle of the weekend and that's why.
Never really thought about this thing.......... How will we be able to use Bitcoin if there will be like 50 million Bitcoin users? It'd be a shame if Bitcoin won't be able to sustain so many peoples' transactions.... It's growing fast!! Hope we will be able to use it just like we are right now!
|
|
|
|
BTCLovingDude (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1010
BTC to the moon is inevitable...
|
|
February 20, 2017, 02:10:32 PM |
|
to be perfectly clear, i was not talking about "what these transactions are" or "why they are big". instead i was saying that these type of transactions seems to be occurring more these days and blocks are full in another way: with bigger transactions, so smaller number of txs fit in one block.
|
--looking for signature--
|
|
|
calkob
|
|
February 20, 2017, 03:19:52 PM |
|
Blocks usually contain 2000+ transactions to reach the max size (999ish aka 1 MB) but lately, mostly today i have been seeing much smaller number of transactions. i don't know how frequent this is though! examples (all are full blocks): Height #tx 453742 576 453742 546 453730 829 453720 114453719 910 There might be alot of sig campaigns and Faucets that pay out on a monday.
|
|
|
|
vnvizow
|
|
February 20, 2017, 03:49:49 PM |
|
Signature campaigns, mining fees, bitcoin mixers, or people stuck with cloud mining contracts outputting 0.0000004btc per day Some fundamental changes will have to be made to accommodate the increase in those uses so normal users and go about their day but things like Segwit doesn't seem to do so well these days
|
|
|
|
Variogam
|
|
February 20, 2017, 04:23:36 PM |
|
Never really thought about this thing.......... How will we be able to use Bitcoin if there will be like 50 million Bitcoin users? It'd be a shame if Bitcoin won't be able to sustain so many peoples' transactions.... It's growing fast!! Hope we will be able to use it just like we are right now!
With onchain blockspace resource limited, the more Bitcoin users, the less often they can make onchain transaction. Some basic math: with 1 MB blocks or about 250 000 daily onchain transactions possible mean: for 2M userbase 1 onchain transaction weekly for everybody, for 8M userbase 1 onchain transaction monthly for everybody and for 50M userbase 1 onchain transaction every half year for everybody. These are averages, if some doing onchain transactions more often than averages, others need to do onchain transactions less often than averages.
|
|
|
|
BTCLovingDude (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1010
BTC to the moon is inevitable...
|
|
February 22, 2017, 01:40:06 PM |
|
is there any tool or chart that shows number of transactions per block for each block. the blockchain.info charts has one (/charts/n-transactions-per-block) but that shows the average number so we can't see the individual blocks per day.
i mostly want to know if the common occurrence of this is new or was common before and i never noticed it.
more blocks: 454186 391 454183 571 454179 519 454177 247 manually checking takes a long time!
|
--looking for signature--
|
|
|
doomistake
|
|
February 22, 2017, 01:58:28 PM |
|
Blocks usually contain 2000+ transactions to reach the max size (999ish aka 1 MB) but lately, mostly today i have been seeing much smaller number of transactions. i don't know how frequent this is though! examples (all are full blocks): Height #tx 453742 576 453742 546 453730 829 453720 114453719 910 I guess this is the number one Hot Topic here in this forum because the blockchain seems having trouble again and many transactions are not yet confirmed for over 24 hours or more. But we don't need to worry about this thing because it is not new to us, we have also experienced the same problem before because of the rapidly growth of the bitcoin population causing the blockchain to collapse because of too many transactions. Please don't be mad guys, I know you are getting frustrated because of the delay of your bitcoin transactions, but it won't solve the problem by getting mad on the blockchain, let's remain calm and just wait till this problem's over.
|
|
|
|
|