Very interesting. I have not thought about this much, and have pretty much assumed all side chains were created equally (no matter if they were called sidechains or child chains or etc... a lot of terms exist.) If it is how you state, then I need to revisit the concept.
I am weary of Nxt and its derivatives though, because Nxt practically failed. It is good ya'll are trying to do a reboot with Ardor, but again I am a bit apprehensive due to the past performance of Nxt.
Yeah. The explanation given towards sidechains and child chains is worth reading, as it helps you understand how they work in making a cryptocurrency scalable. In my point of view, I believe that the concept of child chains is better, with its introduction in the Ardor platform.
NXT was good in the past, but it will become outdated as Ardor takes the lead in development and innovation. With child chains, it could prove to become a more efficient blockchain platform, that will allow businesses and individuals to adopt it quickly, without the need to experience low transaction throughput.
If successful, then Ardor may have solved the scalability issues underlying most of the cryptocurrencies within the markets, making it a widely used platform for commerce in the digital world.
Nevertheless, whenever it is sidechains, child chains or even block size increase, it will be up to debate to determine which is best to make a blockchain the most scalable one possible to handle large transaction load from users in the mainstream world. Just sharing my thoughts