Is it possible to create a "successful" ICO?

[densuj]

We all know 99% of ICOs end up to be garbage - only a few coins tend to live long enough to be considered 'worthwhile' (maintaining or rising above the ICO price).

What does the community think keeps these coins alive, instead of the usual result of those buying into the ICO dumping upon launch?

I think not, ICO are like new way to scam the people and there are not the rules manage about the ICO, should there are something escrow between the investors and the developers of coins, the escrow must control amount of ICO, investors who make investments on ICO and the escrow must control about the progress the projects, it will protect the investors from scamers of ICO.

[1715471629]

1715471629

[Spoetnik]

I think yeah.. because.

(Secretly i need to make money off them)

I say yeah because they are crooked but won't admit it nor will i admit every one of them is a failure.

ROI'z !!!111ONE

[The Sceptical Chymist]

More like 99.99% BEGIN as garbage and are swept away in the torrent of diarrhea from the moment of conception.  If you can find a way to market a coin to the mass sucker pool, then you'll have a hit.  Like this new one, Pepecash or whateverthefuck it's called.  Or something like dogecoin. 

Every single one of these pieces of shit tries to have a gimmick, and it's all blatantly obvious.  None of these coins has a reason to exist.  They are looking to be a solution to a problem that doesn't exist--but idiots buy them up anyway.  It's all madness, I tell you.

[clickerz]

We have different opinion here but I think yes, it is possible to have a successful ICO. Like ICONOMI they are successful and possibly other coins. Just see to it that the coins has a demand or purpose where people are buying it because it is needed or they can benefited from it. All investors only wants their ROI, most are businessmen.