Rumours That Dash Will Kill Bitcoin

[Casabrandy]

Even a new person like me can see through this bullshittery. Get out of here dude.

DASH IS NOT DECENTRALIZED

It is crystal clear. And coins that didn't decentralized always end up to ash in the long run. I wonder how will dash overtake bitcoin since it is developed couple years and stiil no improvement. This is a very good tactics of devs on spreading rumor so that his will get the momentum as bitcoin price hike. Well played

[dwgscale11]

#fakenews

Dash is a scam, Amanda B Scamson and Evan are exiting on all you poor souls.  Dont fall for the old used car salesman tricks.

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@thedashguy/warning-why-i-don-t-trust-the-price-of-dash-nor-the-community-be-careful-folks-invest-wisely-diversify

[schnötzel]

Commerce would grow, everyone would be available obtain and pay for everything with bitcoin.
This is an great video, bitcoin is the main currency of world:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPgd7Hj3ABQ

What is wrong people?
Stop using banks.

What happened memento?  

[NeuroticFish]

Some asshole without any research wrote shit...

Actually he did real research and you have fallen for propaganda.
I can make a nice drawing about a coin I want and tell things. That will not make them true. But I may have a bigger chance than you just because I would not call "asshole" the people bumping my advertising.

Don't lie. If Bitcoin would do something instead of promising i would not support Dash, but if Bitcoin developers lie that everything is okay, then i prefer to use Dash.

I don't lie. You do.
Bitcoin's problems are quite a debate and I guess that they'll be fixed, hopefully soon.
But you know, the world is bigger than Bitcoin and Dash.
However, I don't know why I am wasting my time, it's clear that you prefer the bubble you live in.

[Piston Honda]

lmao who makes these stupid ass thread?!??!!

[BitcoinNational]

Here we go again with the delusional propaganda.

propa
ganda

pooH
aGandi

Since everyone else is too lazy to do this, I will:

i'm with iamnotback.
BCT ... TALK ... doesn;t care about your pump  
really ... I rather here pumpy banter from LEO or SWISS.

Dash supporters like you are just day dreamers.Just dream whatever you want.

Looking for suckers @$20 ... fonzi jumped the shark @$40.
literally every other shit coin on the charts, stinks less, do i need to clarify?


tanks spoet!

[phr0stbyt3]

Lol you don't get it if you see there are way more altcoins In this world which have better features than bitcoin with fast transaction and god knows many more things but the only reason bitcoin will stay at top is because it has many more investors and will get even more in future because most of them invest in it seeing it past price most of them don't care about features.

[hyudien]

Dash can't kill bitcoin, because every altcoin was made from bitcoin basically.

[toknormal]

I had another debate in the CoinJoin thread a few weeks ago with gmaxwell and I won.

Unfortunately, winning at spectator sports ≠ winning on the pitch 

[arielbit]

it seems DASH are hiring spammers for their propaganda machine...or maybe some nut job was brainwashed LOL

from that Memento turd other thread (moderated):

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

And you say that i am a spammer...
I will delete them but i will leave them for while to allow everyone to see what asshole you are...

Whatever, seems that you are just another one liar who lies that Bitcoin is great for transactions...
Now i clearly see that someone is hired to ruin Dash threads and lie about Bitcoin, Dash is forbidden in these forums because Dash is biggest Bitcoin competitor...

where did i lie about bitcoin? quotes? posts?

anyway i haven't had any problem with my bitcoin transactions since 2013

EDIT: i think you are the one hired here by team DASH...you opened 3 DASH topics today already.

Now i see clearly that developers instead of solving Bitcoin problems trying to ruin Dash threads...

Bitcoin is better for holding, Dash is better for transactions, i think people will realise that it's better to use Bitcoin for holding and Dash for spending.

it's full of coins for making transactions, with even low fees, fast txs.
Why you choose Dash and not ... another coin?

Everything explained:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GwsmnHE3Rk

so i am a bitcoin developer now?..LOL

fuckin newb..you're disgusting.

delete my all my post now..bye.

[iamnotback]

I had another debate in the CoinJoin thread a few weeks ago with gmaxwell and I won.

Unfortunately, winning at spectator sports ≠ winning on the pitch  

Yeah and I posit that @gmaxwell is going to be the spectator when it really matters.

Side-chains are fundamentally flawed and can't ever work securely. Lightning Networks can't work decentralized.

Perhaps Blockstream's Confidential Transactions (aka CT) might end up being an important technology but that is not clear yet. I may have devised a more efficient solution improving CCT (but it is also possible I have a math error in that work I did). CCT ≠ CT, they are two different technologies that have roughly the same functionality.

Cryptographers are specialists. But blockchains require also wider range of divergent thinking skills.

[ArticMine]

...

Yeah and I posit that @gmaxwell is going to be the spectator.

Side-chains are fundamentally flawed and can't ever work securely. Lightning Networks can't work decentralized.

Side chains are constrained by a fixed number of coins. As far as I can see, without an emission of new coins there is no practical way to secure them with one notable exception; namely demurrage. The credit for this belongs to Freicoin http://freico.in/

I know this is controversial but it can work, particularly for a side chain whose purpose is transactions as opposed to wealth storage. A 1% per year demurrage rate is not a real issue if the velocity of money is say 2 weeks.

[wavespump]

Dash? You need to surpass Ethereum first, and then Bitcoin, you are much less than Ethereum's market cap, don't compare with Bitcoin, you are not eligible to compare with Bitcoin. Also Dash is Eth's 18% in market share. Nothing to hype, but insta-mine scandal can be always mentioned.

[toknormal]

Yeah and I posit that @gmaxwell is going to be the spectator when it really matters.

Well it "really matters" and I only see one spectator and it isn't him

[iamnotback]

Yeah and I posit that @gmaxwell is going to be the spectator when it really matters.

Well it "really matters" and I only see one spectator and it isn't him

You'll later understand what I mean by "when it really matters" when it really matters.

[iamnotback]

...

Yeah and I posit that @gmaxwell is going to be the spectator.

Side-chains are fundamentally flawed and can't ever work securely. Lightning Networks can't work decentralized.

Side chains are constrained by a fixed number of coins. As far as I can see, without an emission of new coins there is no practical way to secure them with one notable exception; namely demurrage. The credit for this belongs to Freicoin http://freico.in/

I know this is controversial but it can work, particularly for a side chain whose purpose is transactions as opposed to wealth storage. A 1% per year demurrage rate is not a real issue if the velocity of money is say 2 weeks.

The problem is incentivizing mining, because merge mining is insecure, side-chains can't create coins, and transaction fees are not incentives compatible in PoW.

How do you envision demurrage incentivizing sufficient mining to secure a PoW side-chain?

Secondly merge-mining suffers from 50+% attacks if the chain being merge-mined doesn’t have a majority of total hashing power... which kinda defeats the point if we're worried about miner scalability.

[gredisgold88]

still a long way to catch bitcoin, it may take 5-6 years, the velocity of money in the BTC is still pretty good and still on top, if only some small investors, still a long way to change the bitcoin above

[ArticMine]

...

The problem is incentivizing mining, because merge mining is insecure, side-chains can't create coins, and transaction fees are not incentives compatible in PoW.

How do you envision demurrage incentivizing sufficient mining to secure a PoW side-chain?
...

A 1% per year demurrage rate can produce a 1% per year block reward while keeping the number of coins in the side chain constant. The demurrage amount and block reward are adjusted continuously to reflect the number of coins in the side chain. In Freicoin demurrage is used to compensate the miners while keeping the number of coins constant. Their demurrage rate I believe is higher.

1% is approximately the tail emission of Monero (0.6 XMR per 2 min block). This roughly corresponds to 3 XBT per 10 min block for Bitcoin.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

You guys are blind and insane, keep holding bitcoins and writing conspiracies...
Bitcoin is only good for holding, but not for transactions and many other problems that never will get solved. Years passing and we still getting only promises while Dash fucking Bitcoin.

No kidding!  Bitcoin is great for getting into my wallet and staying there, but as far as actually using it to buy things--it's HORRIBLE.  For a number of reasons, and getting transactions stuck in the blockchain is just one of them.

I like Dash, but I haven't owned any in a few months.  It's always bad timing with me. 

Dash isn't going to kill anything, but if you could actually find some merchants willing to accept it, then it might be a good alternative to bitcoin.  But, like bitcoin, I don't see myself buying anything else with crypto.  Not when prices are going through the roof.

[mining_spaceship]

Thanks for the chart, but I think in terms of decentralization Bitcoin is superior. In addition, from the information I have Dash allows users to mix transactions, making them confusing, but not totally anonymous. In this sense it seems that Monero is more anonymous. And that raises another question... why does Dash have a market capitalization greater than Monero?