Conservatives/Republicans should be banned from America

[GreenBits]

Alright, let's see. Conservatives tend to be

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

2) Believe that global warming does not exist (Global warming does exist, not just by the hole in the ozone layer, but by obvious things, go take into account the millions of cars, airplanes, coal plants, etc releasing tons of abnormal and excess carbon dioxide, monoxide, etc and tell me that doesn't affect the environment. All that man-made technology has to have an affect on a planet which has never experienced any such thing before)

3) Are usually sexist and tend to not support women's rights such as the right to have an abortion(Abortion is NOT the killing of babies, abortion is basically the taking of stem cells before they form into an actual fetus. If you consider "cells" as being alive, then everyone on planet earth is a murderer because our skin sheds millions of cells everyday)

4) Tend to be more racist than any other political party as proven by the fact that most KKK members and other racial groups identify as conservative

5) Support having low to no restrictions on gun handling and buying. Let's take this into account, in order to drive a car you need a license and rigorous training of the laws of the road, as well as how to actually drive the car. Well, in some states you don't even need to have a gun license to buy a gun or even know how to shoot the gun in order to buy one. Does that make any damn sense when a average gun is far more dangerous and cheaper to buy than a car ? No, therefore I come to believe that anyone who supports the buying of guns without rigorous testing and at least having a license, is heavily retarded or wants to watch the world burn



The only logical conclusion is to get rid of conservatives from america. Like how trump is deporting illegal immigrants, well conservatives go against the constitution itself(such as trying to integrate religious belief with law, etc)

I know this is rhetorical, but I gotta respond.

What you are seeing in the Trump era is not true Republicanism. The Conservatives haven't changed a bit. Trump energized the populist voter, who is failing to thrive in their own environment and believes that the reason for this is because they have been marginalized in favor of minorities. No, the reason for this is because corporate interests have used you and moved along, like the rest of America. This 'nationalism' is 'racism' that is being justified under this false political heading of patriotism. True Rebuplicans have varied beliefs, but they all can agree that the smaller government is, the better. Opposite for Dems, they prefer more engaged, larger government.

So, this fake brand of Rebuplicanism is just a facade for those that want to push the lie of trickle down economics. By wrapping it in a delicious, racist and insensitive candy coated shell, they can feed bulllshit to the ignorant masses. Who will then be tricked into supporting fiscal policies that don't benefit them.

[bra4our]

Its a well known fact that Trump is not a true republican/conservative he is a donkey in an elephant clothing, its no surprise that the elites in the Republican party were against him from the start. They always knew he was never truly one of them but luckily his message had already resonated into the hearts and mind of the people already.

[GreenBits]

Its a well known fact that Trump is not a true republican/conservative he is a donkey in an elephant clothing, its no surprise that the elites in the Republican party were against him from the start. They always knew he was never truly one of them but luckily his message had already resonated into the hearts and mind of the people already.

It's crazy that the GOP is supporting him so soundly. Outright incompetence, international uproar and domestic unrest. Damn Obama, he was so boring compared to this... clusterfuck.

So, you obviously voted for our dear President Trump. What part of his message resonated most in your heart and mind? Lock her up, or build a wall?

Maybe it was drain the swamp.


      

Your cohorts made a mistake, that they won't admit to. This will become apparent soon, to those that can't see the obvious.

[BADecker]

All us conservative, republican types welcome all you liberal, democrat types, to our country.

Before Trump was elected, during the campaign, a bunch of you liberal, democrat types swung your vote over to Trump. And, probably a few conservative, republican types swung their vote democrat.

The point is, we welcome you. You are so fun to watch with your double standard. But, hey. Canada, South America, Central America, Australia, and even Africa are all open to you. We don't really want you to go, but go ahead if you don't like freedom here.

[GreenBits]

All us conservative, republican types welcome all you liberal, democrat types, to our country.

Before Trump was elected, during the campaign, a bunch of you liberal, democrat types swung your vote over to Trump. And, probably a few conservative, republican types swung their vote democrat.

The point is, we welcome you. You are so fun to watch with your double standard. But, hey. Canada, South America, Central America, Australia, and even Africa are all open to you. We don't really want you to go, but go ahead if you don't like freedom here.

Well, from the moderate camp, we love all you guys, but we are shocked and awed at the present state of dismay, and we need your help to get this train back on track. And I dunno, I don't think too many liberal types swung after the Comey thing. True old school Republicans only have disdain for Trump. New money, too brash. He only became useful when they realized the motivations aligned (lower corporate taxes, less regulation = more profits).

 And Trump is fucking it up for us, our immigration policies might make it hard in the future for us to travel to said countries, LOL. What goes around will come around.

Who will want to deal with crazy ass Americans?

[ridery99]

Alright, let's see. Conservatives tend to be

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

2) Believe that global warming does not exist (Global warming does exist, not just by the hole in the ozone layer, but by obvious things, go take into account the millions of cars, airplanes, coal plants, etc releasing tons of abnormal and excess carbon dioxide, monoxide, etc and tell me that doesn't affect the environment. All that man-made technology has to have an affect on a planet which has never experienced any such thing before)

3) Are usually sexist and tend to not support women's rights such as the right to have an abortion(Abortion is NOT the killing of babies, abortion is basically the taking of stem cells before they form into an actual fetus. If you consider "cells" as being alive, then everyone on planet earth is a murderer because our skin sheds millions of cells everyday)

4) Tend to be more racist than any other political party as proven by the fact that most KKK members and other racial groups identify as conservative

5) Support having low to no restrictions on gun handling and buying. Let's take this into account, in order to drive a car you need a license and rigorous training of the laws of the road, as well as how to actually drive the car. Well, in some states you don't even need to have a gun license to buy a gun or even know how to shoot the gun in order to buy one. Does that make any damn sense when a average gun is far more dangerous and cheaper to buy than a car ? No, therefore I come to believe that anyone who supports the buying of guns without rigorous testing and at least having a license, is heavily retarded or wants to watch the world burn



The only logical conclusion is to get rid of conservatives from america. Like how trump is deporting illegal immigrants, well conservatives go against the constitution itself(such as trying to integrate religious belief with law, etc)

Soros, is that you?

[Sithara007]

Alright, let's see. Conservatives tend to be

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

People like me oppose gay marriage not because we are against homosexuality. The point is that, the homosexuals are not as committed to their spouses as much as the heterosexuals. For the gays, marriage is only a tool for lower taxes and higher benefits. 

[GreenBits]

Alright, let's see. Conservatives tend to be

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

People like me oppose gay marriage not because we are against homosexuality. The point is that, the homosexuals are not as committed to their spouses as much as the heterosexuals. For the gays, marriage is only a tool for lower taxes and higher benefits. 

I'm not even trying to be a dick, but so you know, homosexual divorce rates in America are roughly equal to heterosexual divorce rates, but there is actually a lower divorce rate globally for same sex couples. I would assume, given the adversity they have experienced trying to be recognized, they would tend to be more serious about maintaining said relationship. Society will marginalize them, their family will reject them; you had better be damned serious about being gay in America, it can ruin your career and social life in the right place (i live out on the country, i have actually heard people troll gay cashiers in public for being gay, and dared them to say something back. And honestly, they woukd have beat his ass had he spoken up). Why would you assume that gay people are any less committed to a relationship than a straight person would be? Again, I'm not trolling. Just curious as to what you saw to develop this attitude. I don't know a whole lot of gay people, but I don't see how being gay would diminish a person's devotion to the person they have chosen as their mate.

See? I'm not all asshole. Just mostly. I really want to understand you guys. I may be wrong, I just need the proper argument to show.me an alternative,.

[bryant.coleman]

Alright, let's see. Conservatives tend to be

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

People like me oppose gay marriage not because we are against homosexuality. The point is that, the homosexuals are not as committed to their spouses as much as the heterosexuals. For the gays, marriage is only a tool for lower taxes and higher benefits. 

I'm not even trying to be a dick, but so you know, homosexual divorce rates in America are roughly equal to heterosexual divorce rates, but there is actually a lower divorce rate globally for same sex couples. I would assume, given the adversity they have experienced trying to be recognized, they would tend to be more serious about maintaining said relationship. Society will marginalize them, their family will reject them; you had better be damned serious about being gay in America, it can ruin your career and social life in the right place (i live out on the country, i have actually heard people troll gay cashiers in public for being gay, and dared them to say something back. And honestly, they woukd have beat his ass had he spoken up). Why would you assume that gay people are any less committed to a relationship than a straight person would be? Again, I'm not trolling. Just curious as to what you saw to develop this attitude. I don't know a whole lot of gay people, but I don't see how being gay would diminish a person's devotion to the person they have chosen as their mate.

See? I'm not all asshole. Just mostly. I really want to understand you guys. I may be wrong, I just need the proper argument to show.me an alternative,.

The research says otherwise. I am not going to post it here again, as I had done that before. Check this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1168216.msg12340765#msg12340765

And remember that this research was not done by some far-right organization or some ultra-conservative Christian church. The research was done by reputed members of the scientific community, and it was published in a well renowned scientific journal.

[Joshuar]

Alright, let's see. Conservatives tend to be

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

People like me oppose gay marriage not because we are against homosexuality. The point is that, the homosexuals are not as committed to their spouses as much as the heterosexuals. For the gays, marriage is only a tool for lower taxes and higher benefits.  

I'm not even trying to be a dick, but so you know, homosexual divorce rates in America are roughly equal to heterosexual divorce rates, but there is actually a lower divorce rate globally for same sex couples. I would assume, given the adversity they have experienced trying to be recognized, they would tend to be more serious about maintaining said relationship. Society will marginalize them, their family will reject them; you had better be damned serious about being gay in America, it can ruin your career and social life in the right place (i live out on the country, i have actually heard people troll gay cashiers in public for being gay, and dared them to say something back. And honestly, they woukd have beat his ass had he spoken up). Why would you assume that gay people are any less committed to a relationship than a straight person would be? Again, I'm not trolling. Just curious as to what you saw to develop this attitude. I don't know a whole lot of gay people, but I don't see how being gay would diminish a person's devotion to the person they have chosen as their mate.

See? I'm not all asshole. Just mostly. I really want to understand you guys. I may be wrong, I just need the proper argument to show.me an alternative,.

The research says otherwise. I am not going to post it here again, as I had done that before. Check this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1168216.msg12340765#msg12340765

And remember that this research was not done by some far-right organization or some ultra-conservative Christian church. The research was done by reputed members of the scientific community, and it was published in a well renowned scientific journal.

I've read that and in that case, homosexual men have it better. Surely you've read the plethora of studies on female sexuality, and how women are turned on by other women, even animals etc, but Not the naked form of a male.

The reason homosexual men have so much sex is because they are sexually attracted to each other. The reason women and men don't have as much sex is because women are not as sexually aroused by men, as men are by women. Let's break it down; on every study done on female sexuality, women were not aroused by the male form. They were only aroused by an erect male penis. Men however, were aroused by a naked women's form. So if anything, I'd rather be gay than straight so I could get a fulfilling sexual life that I know is genuine because gay men are truly sexually aroused by each other's bodies, but unfortunately I'm a straight male .


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11977121/Women-are-either-bisexual-or-gay-but-never-straight.html
http://www.yourtango.com/2011104439/study-average-woman-bisexual
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/fashion/12bisex.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html

etc.

[Sithara007]

I've read that and in that case, homosexual men have it better. Surely you've read the plethora of studies on female sexuality, and how women are turned on by other women, even animals etc, but Not the naked form of a male.

Hahaha.... try telling that to 98% of the women, who are not lesbian or bisexual. I have asked them the same question, and every single one of them say that the naked form of a male excites them. I would rather believe them, rather than trusting psycho researchers such as Chivers.

[Fireblazer]

Alright, let's see. Conservatives tend to be

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

People like me oppose gay marriage not because we are against homosexuality. The point is that, the homosexuals are not as committed to their spouses as much as the heterosexuals. For the gays, marriage is only a tool for lower taxes and higher benefits. 

I'm not even trying to be a dick, but so you know, homosexual divorce rates in America are roughly equal to heterosexual divorce rates, but there is actually a lower divorce rate globally for same sex couples. I would assume, given the adversity they have experienced trying to be recognized, they would tend to be more serious about maintaining said relationship. Society will marginalize them, their family will reject them; you had better be damned serious about being gay in America, it can ruin your career and social life in the right place (i live out on the country, i have actually heard people troll gay cashiers in public for being gay, and dared them to say something back. And honestly, they woukd have beat his ass had he spoken up). Why would you assume that gay people are any less committed to a relationship than a straight person would be? Again, I'm not trolling. Just curious as to what you saw to develop this attitude. I don't know a whole lot of gay people, but I don't see how being gay would diminish a person's devotion to the person they have chosen as their mate.

See? I'm not all asshole. Just mostly. I really want to understand you guys. I may be wrong, I just need the proper argument to show.me an alternative,.

Gay chooses as a partner the same gay it is unequivocal. But if you compare politicians with these people, then most likely politicians can be compared with prostitutes. And this is a specific characteristic for the politician. But why do people think that without these two parties will be better.

[Hazir]

Just because you are not agreeing with someone and doesn't share someone's opinion, doesn't mean you can ban your political opponents.
Let others believe in whatever they feel like believing. As long as it is not harming others and doesn't have other nasty consequences.

I see this thread is slowly becoming a battleground for pro and anti gay discussion.
Let's stop now. This is matter of your own conviction, you can't convince others if they feel differently about the subject.

[HabBear]

Alright, let's address these statements one by one.

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

1) What you're against in this example isn't Conservatives, it's Christianity and Christian values being intermingled with Conservative values. You realize that true Conservatives are religion agnostic, however if some Christians also believe in Conservative values the Conservatives will claim to be "Christian first" just to win the votes. You're against Christian values.

2) Believe that global warming does not exist (Global warming does exist, not just by the hole in the ozone layer, but by obvious things, go take into account the millions of cars, airplanes, coal plants, etc releasing tons of abnormal and excess carbon dioxide, monoxide, etc and tell me that doesn't affect the environment. All that man-made technology has to have an affect on a planet which has never experienced any such thing before)

Agree with you here. However it's not well known if Conservative deny global warming because they don't trust the science or because the don't want a reason to hold business back. Conservatives are all about (supposedly) less government...so any regulation regardless of topic is potentially a bad one for them. And this is likely driven by Christian values...if god created the earth the only destruction to it comes from the devil...not nature.

3) Are usually sexist and tend to not support women's rights such as the right to have an abortion(Abortion is NOT the killing of babies, abortion is basically the taking of stem cells before they form into an actual fetus. If you consider "cells" as being alive, then everyone on planet earth is a murderer because our skin sheds millions of cells everyday)

This is another Christian imposition on the Conservative platform.

4) Tend to be more racist than any other political party as proven by the fact that most KKK members and other racial groups identify as conservative

There's ZERO evidence to support this claim. There are plenty of racist liberals. What other racial groups identify as Conservative?

5) Support having low to no restrictions on gun handling and buying. Let's take this into account, in order to drive a car you need a license and rigorous training of the laws of the road, as well as how to actually drive the car. Well, in some states you don't even need to have a gun license to buy a gun or even know how to shoot the gun in order to buy one. Does that make any damn sense when a average gun is far more dangerous and cheaper to buy than a car ? No, therefore I come to believe that anyone who supports the buying of guns without rigorous testing and at least having a license, is heavily retarded or wants to watch the world burn

A core Conservative value. Doesn't make any sense. They say "guns don't kill people, people kill people" but then ban laptops on computers, drugs, abortion...it's totally illogical.

The only logical conclusion is to get rid of conservatives from america. Like how trump is deporting illegal immigrants, well conservatives go against the constitution itself(such as trying to integrate religious belief with law, etc)

And what's  your "logical" conclusion for how to "get rid of conservatives from America?

[Sithara007]

Just because you are not agreeing with someone and doesn't share someone's opinion, doesn't mean you can ban your political opponents.
Let others believe in whatever they feel like believing. As long as it is not harming others and doesn't have other nasty consequences.

The extreme left and the liberals have always used force and intimidatory tactics to derail the freedom of speech and expression of their rivals. Look at what is going on in Germany. A single FaceBook post against the ongoing immigration scandal, and you can end up behind the bars.

[HabBear]

Just because you are not agreeing with someone and doesn't share someone's opinion, doesn't mean you can ban your political opponents.
Let others believe in whatever they feel like believing. As long as it is not harming others and doesn't have other nasty consequences.

The extreme left and the liberals have always used force and intimidatory tactics to derail the freedom of speech and expression of their rivals. Look at what is going on in Germany. A single FaceBook post against the ongoing immigration scandal, and you can end up behind the bars.

Same as the extreme right (the Religious Right in the US). Their attacks against rock bands in the 70s, calling it "devil's music" is a prime example.

By the way, i'm not a sole defender of liberals. I dislike both parties and actually think they are creating much of the problem in the US.

One of the greatest Republican and Religious Right hipocrisies is their claim that they are pro-life. They're pro-life at birth and not pro-life at every other stage of life. You can't be against abortion and against Universal Healthcare...one is pro-life and the other is not.