awds1th
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 12:31:57 PM |
|
if LUN is listed on liqui i think LUN has good shot it will also end up listed on polo. they did say exchanges so more than one must be in contact.
|
|
|
|
mummybtc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 12:53:15 PM |
|
if LUN is listed on liqui i think LUN has good shot it will also end up listed on polo. they did say exchanges so more than one must be in contact.
Why are you talking of Liqui.io when there are better exchange with huge trading volume on the site, I think Kraken and Bittrex will list it but can tell of Poloniex. The project will be very huge and great returns for the investors
|
|
|
|
awds1th
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 01:08:16 PM Last edit: April 23, 2017, 01:26:16 PM by awds1th |
|
well, they commented so they were first to have my attention. not saying that LUN can't possibly be listed on kraken, bittrex, etherdelta, yunbi, etc.
|
|
|
|
Ipwich
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 01:15:17 PM |
|
if LUN is listed on liqui i think LUN has good shot it will also end up listed on polo. they did say exchanges so more than one must be in contact.
Why are you talking of Liqui.io when there are better exchange with huge trading volume on the site, I think Kraken and Bittrex will list it but can tell of Poloniex. The project will be very huge and great returns for the investors We cannot assure of great returns yet, we just need to wait until the ICO is over and on how people would react when it is listed in exchanges. Liqui is quite new but they have a good volume now already and it could be one of the exchanges but I like to see more.
|
|
|
|
kalpit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 01:45:11 PM |
|
if LUN is listed on liqui i think LUN has good shot it will also end up listed on polo. they did say exchanges so more than one must be in contact.
Why are you talking of Liqui.io when there are better exchange with huge trading volume on the site, I think Kraken and Bittrex will list it but can tell of Poloniex. The project will be very huge and great returns for the investors We cannot assure of great returns yet, we just need to wait until the ICO is over and on how people would react when it is listed in exchanges. Liqui is quite new but they have a good volume now already and it could be one of the exchanges but I like to see more. In long run there is a good chance of profit. Near the end of ico we week get clearer picture of profits in short term.
|
|
|
|
NorthPixel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 02:41:22 PM |
|
Who needs decentralized Wikipedia with advertising? Why if there is no advertising?
|
|
|
|
kalpit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 04:04:31 PM |
|
Who needs decentralized Wikipedia with advertising? Why if there is no advertising?
Yes! There are very very few advantage of Lunyr. But if it is used by publishers instead of Wikipedia, it will automatically create user base. Publishers have a reason to use lunyr instead of Wikipedia. If it has cleaner ads it won't be a problem for users. Advertising indirectly supports LUN price.
|
|
|
|
poon4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 04:33:25 PM |
|
how to deal with the rest of coin if did not reached the max goal?
|
|
|
|
disconnectme
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 04:47:43 PM |
|
if LUN is listed on liqui i think LUN has good shot it will also end up listed on polo. they did say exchanges so more than one must be in contact.
Why are you talking of Liqui.io when there are better exchange with huge trading volume on the site, I think Kraken and Bittrex will list it but can tell of Poloniex. The project will be very huge and great returns for the investors We cannot assure of great returns yet, we just need to wait until the ICO is over and on how people would react when it is listed in exchanges. Liqui is quite new but they have a good volume now already and it could be one of the exchanges but I like to see more. In long run there is a good chance of profit. Near the end of ico we week get clearer picture of profits in short term. Anyone thinking this is a short term investment will be a loser in the long run, look at the roadmap, it is for a long period this project is going to derive its value from the numbers of users and has more users use the platform the higher the value rises.
|
|
|
|
andreibi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1647
Merit: 1012
Practising Hebrew before visiting Israel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 04:53:55 PM |
|
Who needs decentralized Wikipedia with advertising? Why if there is no advertising?
Yes! There are very very few advantage of Lunyr. But if it is used by publishers instead of Wikipedia, it will automatically create user base. Publishers have a reason to use lunyr instead of Wikipedia. If it has cleaner ads it won't be a problem for users. Advertising indirectly supports LUN price. The best types of ads for Lunyr are the one-liners in between paragraphs.
|
|
|
|
memii
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 05:13:57 PM |
|
Finally Lunyr got succeed to pass the minimum as expected so many people are investing into this ICO. Devs has nice plan for long term so they will turn this one into reputable and secure investment still price is same like day 1.
|
|
|
|
radiera
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 295
Merit: 250
ॐ http://goaco.in ॐ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 05:32:19 PM |
|
Finally Lunyr succeed, many people talk cant reach minimum, hahahha... go ahead dev
|
|
|
|
arnpham
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 139
Merit: 100
Check out LUNYR at https://lunyr.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 05:32:55 PM |
|
how to deal with the rest of coin if did not reached the max goal?
There are no extra tokens
|
|
|
|
andreibi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1647
Merit: 1012
Practising Hebrew before visiting Israel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 05:35:07 PM |
|
So many people still don't understand much about smart contracts.
|
|
|
|
_DaNiLo_
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 06:07:13 PM |
|
Wikipedia made a great job until now, but it's stuck in time. Wikipedia has already 16 years old and almost didnt evolve. I know we all love wikipedia because it hasn't ad. But I must admit the content of wikipedia is usually very superficial. The lack of financial incentives to write articles make a really big difference. Most people that has the deep knowledge of a thing prefers to do a book about that subject, with financial incentives things can be different.
Wikipedia website is so old design, read there is tiring.
Look at youtube. A lot of people just make videos to win some money, if wasn't the financial incentive I guarantee youtube was almost nothing now. Facebook is the same. Google is the same.
We need Ads to evolve, it's a necessary "evil". I'm very excited about lunyr. With Lunyr, knowledge can now evolve really fast.
I love you wikipedia. But you stopped evolving. The world needs a knowledge base with a better integration with all the revolution happening (cryptoworld, virtual reality, Augmented Reality, Artificial Intelligence, autonomous machines, etc...) and that's where Lunyr comes. Don't worry wikipedia. We are going to do an honorable page about you in Lunyr.
|
|
|
|
Ano
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 06:11:20 PM |
|
So many people still don't understand much about smart contracts.
Would you like explain about Smart Contracts to make it easy to understand for people. Lunyr is bringing decentralized knowledge through this dapp now people showing interest this going hot.
|
|
|
|
rgornik
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 07:09:38 PM |
|
Wikipedia made a great job until now, but it's stuck in time. Wikipedia has already 16 years old and almost didnt evolve. I know we all love wikipedia because it hasn't ad. But I must admit the content of wikipedia is usually very superficial. The lack of financial incentives to write articles make a really big difference. Most people that has the deep knowledge of a thing prefers to do a book about that subject, with financial incentives things can be different.
Wikipedia website is so old design, read there is tiring.
Look at youtube. A lot of people just make videos to win some money, if wasn't the financial incentive I guarantee youtube was almost nothing now. Facebook is the same. Google is the same.
We need Ads to evolve, it's a necessary "evil". I'm very excited about lunyr. With Lunyr, knowledge can now evolve really fast.
I love you wikipedia. But you stopped evolving. The world needs a knowledge base with a better integration with all the revolution happening (cryptoworld, virtual reality, Augmented Reality, Artificial Intelligence, autonomous machines, etc...) and that's where Lunyr comes. Don't worry wikipedia. We are going to do an honorable page about you in Lunyr.
couldnt write it better myself. exaclty that. you need some revenue to finance development
|
|
|
|
LaBlanj
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 11:24:58 PM |
|
wow, lunyr project is going to be biggest! congrats team. i always believe this project. Now ico successsed. p.s. your alpha images seems very cool. Goodjob
|
|
|
|
BERKAH68
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 23, 2017, 11:34:53 PM |
|
wow, lunyr project is going to be biggest! congrats team. i always believe this project. Now ico successsed. p.s. your alpha images seems very cool. Goodjob
Yes hopefully after the coin is distributed and entered into the market the price will go up. So investors feel the success of ico lunyr.good luck!
|
|
|
|
Kryptowerk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1403
Disobey.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 24, 2017, 12:11:14 AM |
|
Wikipedia made a great job until now, but it's stuck in time. Wikipedia has already 16 years old and almost didnt evolve. I know we all love wikipedia because it hasn't ad. But I must admit the content of wikipedia is usually very superficial. The lack of financial incentives to write articles make a really big difference. Most people that has the deep knowledge of a thing prefers to do a book about that subject, with financial incentives things can be different.
Wikipedia website is so old design, read there is tiring.
Look at youtube. A lot of people just make videos to win some money, if wasn't the financial incentive I guarantee youtube was almost nothing now. Facebook is the same. Google is the same.
We need Ads to evolve, it's a necessary "evil". I'm very excited about lunyr. With Lunyr, knowledge can now evolve really fast.
I love you wikipedia. But you stopped evolving. The world needs a knowledge base with a better integration with all the revolution happening (cryptoworld, virtual reality, Augmented Reality, Artificial Intelligence, autonomous machines, etc...) and that's where Lunyr comes. Don't worry wikipedia. We are going to do an honorable page about you in Lunyr.
That comment deserves a re-quote. I can fully agree. There are so many possibilites here, for example: - a paid membership that disables ads - a premium membership, that allows access to in-depth scientific articles that are only relevant to a handful of experts
|
|
|
|
|