Yea sure and next week or so it will hardfork and crash the complete btc economy.
This is pretty much the end. We will probably go from a new ATH to being a crappy altcoin in a matter of hours when the fork happens.
Surely not even *you can seriously believe that garbage you are claiming ?
You think the B.U. guys are stupid enough to try for a hardfork the moment it touches 51% (*if it ever does, which is unlikely) ?
Ignoring the fact that the attempt would likely *fail - From my understanding of the protocol, 51% is just when it becomes theoretically *possible, but still *very unlikely. They need to reach more like 75-80% to stand a reasonable chance of maintaining a dominant chain position. and I doubt that they will ever get anywhere near that. Most smart Miners would know better than to allow a single entity to have control over that much hashing power and would leave their pools long before that.
They have already shown (multiple times) that they aren't competent to even *maintain any sort of existing reliable codebase (much less any innovative new developments) with several completely-unanticipated bugs in their bodgy fork , *and then they *rush ad-hoc fixes out with *no-significant testing period to ensure they arent making things *worse with their hurried patches..
and *If they *were stupid enough to try without a significant majority margin, I think they would *immediately lose a lot of their support, since any attempt at 51% would clearly demonstrate that they are not at all interested in a consensus or the interests of the users, but would be simply trying to wrest personal control over it by force and damn the consequences that could result to the bitcoin ecosystem from a hostile takeover attempt..
Are *these the sort of people you would want to place newly in charge of a project that.. with the current devs, has a proven track record of reliability and security for *8 years now ? I know that I don't..
As has already been pointed out, The majority of Exchanges will *not even *list BU until they have implemented some form of replay protection, which they are unwilling - and probably *incapable of - doing. especially at this point.
*Then, *if they do protect against replay, Most exchanges have said that they will list Unlimited as "BU", *not "BTC" to avert the problems of two closely matched chains swapping dominant positions - possibly repeatedly - until the dust settles. The BU community has still not come up with any answers to the exchanges statements except to sulk.
your claim of "'We' will probably go from ATH to crappy altcoin in hours" *has to be deliberate FUD, or if you *really do believe that, then it shows that you have *no fundamental understanding of what would happen *if the blockchain was to hardfork and should be ignored as obviously clueless.
Also, Whats this "we" stuff pale-face ?
You keep trying to use that term to try to sound like you are "a bitcoin supporter" and give your blather some credibility (hahah), but *everyone here knows that you have done nothing but talk crap, attempt to spread FUD, and jumped gleefully on shouting every vaguely imaginable doomsday scenario you can from the treetops, then going silent (for a while) when you are proven (again and again) to be be utterly wrong.
In fact, I would probably be annoyed by your monotonously predictable kwack-ing, were it not for the fact that one of your posts is nearly always a *good sign (and worth a laugh), since history shows you make a *great contrary indicator. So Kwack away little ducky, you are just convincing me even more that we are on a good path, simply because you dont like it.
Hows that "Obviously overvalued, *My TA "Team" predicts an immediate crash to 180 and then down into double digits within a couple of weeks" bet you made a couple of years back looking now ? Just think, you *could have been up *10x up on an investment if you hadn't been so intent on FUD'ing..
Ah Kwucky. do you often get the feeling that "The *purpose of your life is to act as a good example for others of what *not to do" ?
I would if I were you.
(want to bet he just ignores this post, like he ignores all inconvenient facts that contradict his "visions") ?
