The First Signature Campaign in Bitcointalk Forum

[neochiny]

--

Here's an Overview of Signature Campaigns from 2013: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=333916.0
--

Thanks for the link. 

Turns out the rates were pretty much the same as now.
Only difference I could see was that they had a much higher minimum post count back then. Could go from 50 - 250 MINIMUM POSTS. 
That's just too much. 

Compared to now, where the minimum is 10-15 or the set 25-30 weekly.

Anyway, just goes to show how awesome my campaign's rates are. 
.035/week or .0014/per post. (set/minimum 25 posts a week) 

[1715189936]

1715189936

[1715189936]

1715189936

[1715189936]

1715189936

[1715189936]

1715189936

[positivezero]

I was wondering which was the FIRST Signature Campaign in this forum and what was the bounty or reward given to the participants. Was it be like 10 bitcoins per post for jr. member or something? (DAMN!)

Could anyone post the link if the page exists. I couldn't find after googling it.

I also don't know what particular signature campaign was the first signature campaign in bitcointalk forum. Because i discover and joined in bitcoin so late, im so late  .. But it doesnt matter because i am now here, taking and giving some ideas. Well if bitcoin was built long time ago so of course there are so many signature campaigns that was built also, but i dont exactly know what are they

[xIIImaL]

I was wondering which was the FIRST Signature Campaign in this forum and what was the bounty or reward given to the participants. Was it be like 10 bitcoins per post for jr. member or something? (DAMN!)

Could anyone post the link if the page exists. I couldn't find after googling it.

I also don't know what particular signature campaign was the first signature campaign in bitcointalk forum. Because i discover and joined in bitcoin so late, im so late  .. But it doesnt matter because i am now here, taking and giving some ideas. Well if bitcoin was built long time ago so of course there are so many signature campaigns that was built also, but i dont exactly know what are they

Bitx and bitmixer were the best and long run in this forum i think but not aware of the first campaign in the forum. I remember some of the campaign were paid 0.1 btc for Sr ranks. One of them is lucky btc casino. They were run signature and twitter campaign.

[passwordnow]

--

Here's an Overview of Signature Campaigns from 2013: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=333916.0
--

Thanks for this link mate! Good old threads and upon looking to that thread, the first signature campaign seems to be primedice. And I saw that there's the highest paying campaign which allows you to post 3k posts / month. And that is with ritzcasino, maximum of 3.9 BTC per month way back that year. I'm thinking what if they are still paying that way right now  

RitzGrandCasino (thread)
Payment period: Monthly, 1st of each month.
Minimum posts: 50 posts per month, Member level.
Payments: M: 0.0005 BTC per post, F: 0.0007 BTC per post, S: 0.0011 BTC per post, H: 0.0013 BTC per post. Maximum payable posts per month: 3000.
Miscellaneous: Constructive posts only.

[jhannlenris]

I was wondering which was the FIRST Signature Campaign in this forum and what was the bounty or reward given to the participants. Was it be like 10 bitcoins per post for jr. member or something? (DAMN!)

Could anyone post the link if the page exists. I couldn't find after googling it.

They are lucky now when they got a signature campaign paying that much before. I hope they invest their bitcoin and earn more.

[South Park]

I was wondering which was the FIRST Signature Campaign in this forum and what was the bounty or reward given to the participants. Was it be like 10 bitcoins per post for jr. member or something? (DAMN!)

Could anyone post the link if the page exists. I couldn't find after googling it.

It will be interesting to know and see how much they got paid back then for posting or what where the rules back then, I suppose the rates were way better since the price of bitcoin was lower, but as the price of bitcoin keeps growing maybe in ten years those that become part of signature campaigns will see at our rates and think the same about us.

[catchcoin]

honestly to say,the signature rewards are too low to gain more bitcoin,if you want more ,the best way is to buy buy buy.

[marcotheminer]

I was wondering which was the FIRST Signature Campaign in this forum and what was the bounty or reward given to the participants. Was it be like 10 bitcoins per post for jr. member or something? (DAMN!)

Could anyone post the link if the page exists. I couldn't find after googling it.

It would have been something crazy, back then I guess people got some killer rates (which at the time weren't that much).

I remember Primedice was a great paying gig, Stunna did a good job, I think at some point it was possible to make 1 BTC a month.

I remember (which isn't that long ago) that Bit-X allowed certain high volume posters (I won't throw with names) to earn like 0.5BTC per week. It was pure madness!

These people were making at least 2BTC per month, which at current rates is more than a lot people earn with their regular job. But obviously, Bit-x couldn't sustain such payouts for too long.

But even after cutting heavily in their signature campaign payouts they were still the best paying campaign at that time. Imagine how much someone would earn with several enrolled accounts.

It lasted over a year like that actually!

[HabBear]

The rates would be same or close to same as now because the rates were probably low back then of BTC, But people who saved all their earning they must be living the life, would be interesting to know though someone who actually joined the campaign should post.

There's a split in the campaigns now, some pay about the same rates as before (slightly less) and other campaigns are paying significantly lower rates, dust by comparison.

I'm surprised the dust pay campaigns are even in business, why people accept these lower rates is beyond me.

The real difference was that a few years ago there usually was no limit to the number of posts one could make in a week. You could make 100+ posts getting paid BTC0.0007 per post. That's how people were making such a killing!

[maydna]

i am not surprise that if one signature campaign paid in high for the member because in that day, bitcoin price is not like now and there is many owner that have many of bitcoin so i think its still worth to the owner to paid the member with high price. but now, i think the owner will thinking about this and its related with bitcoin price itself and beside that, the owner will need to think about maintenance of their sites. there will be highly fee that the owner should be payed and it means a big money that they could spend in a month.

[positivezero]

I was wondering which was the FIRST Signature Campaign in this forum and what was the bounty or reward given to the participants. Was it be like 10 bitcoins per post for jr. member or something? (DAMN!)

Could anyone post the link if the page exists. I couldn't find after googling it.

I also don't know what particular signature campaign was the first signature campaign in bitcointalk forum. Because i discover and joined in bitcoin so late, im so late  .. But it doesnt matter because i am now here, taking and giving some ideas. Well if bitcoin was built long time ago so of course there are so many signature campaigns that was built also, but i dont exactly know what are they

Bitx and bitmixer were the best and long run in this forum i think but not aware of the first campaign in the forum. I remember some of the campaign were paid 0.1 btc for Sr ranks. One of them is lucky btc casino. They were run signature and twitter campaign.

Wow! it was so pretty cool. I think in this time, higher ranks like sr. member, hero and legendary doesn't paid for about 0.1 bitcoin. Last years campaign is different from todays campaign more especially when we talk about paying for every ranks. Though they have difference but the most important thing bitcoin grow faster, more progressive and trusted cryptocurrency in the market