I can't comment on individual pools that aren't signalling neither Segwit nor BTU.
you do realise that bitcoin unlimited are not gonna ban hammer the network into splitting. they will wait for the community to come to a majority consensus. and keep it open
thats why nothing has happened while bitcoin unlimited,xt, classic and other have all been running over the last 2+ years as their intention is community consensus. not ban hammer altcoin creation..
seems you keep skipping the point about bip9 and UASF being the ban hammer of core tools to force segwit to activate if core dont get a result.
and segwit has only been part of a vote for 6 months, and already getting desperate to not once but twice now desire bypassing community vote of keeping an open network. by instead, threatening to use block orphaning and banning mechanisms to get their way.
cant you see where the ACTUAL power struggle is actually coming from.
but seeing as you want to argue about the pools while trying to point the finger as if its just one guys fault. makes you really look like you dont understand how vast and open the bitcoin community is.
please get out of the blockstream cabin. it has given you cabin fever to beleive that bitcoin has to be owned by one man
bitcoins strength is better suited without any owner. without a single point of weakness by being decentralised (and i dont mean distributed centralised) i mean truly decentralised
stop supporting blockstream and bring your 3 paragraph attention span into supporting BITCOIN