|
Twipple (OP)
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 03:02:02 AM
Last edit: March 23, 2017, 04:55:43 PM by Twipple |
|
I have decided to post my bets here for which I rely on antimartingale strat. I will post one bet daily and after every consecutive win will 2x my bet based on multiplying number.
Will start with 50 credits.
Left: 49
After making 3 winning bets if you show a slip following me I will give 0.1 btc of my winnings if I win 7 bets in a row. But your bet must be atleast 0.02 that day.
Bet 1: Nara K. vs Schiavone F. . I am chosing Schiavone F. to win.
Betting odds: 1.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Twipple (OP)
|
|
March 23, 2017, 04:52:03 PM |
|
Bet 1: Gavrilova D. / Konta J. - Kuznetsova S. / Mladenovic K. - Selection: Kuznetsova S. / Mladenovic K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twipple (OP)
|
|
March 24, 2017, 12:07:12 PM |
|
Bet 1: Gavrilova D. / Konta J. - Kuznetsova S. / Mladenovic K. - Selection: Kuznetsova S. / Mladenovic K.
WIN! Bet 2 doubling using anti martingale : Carreno-Busta P. - Delbonis F. - Carreno Busta as winner! |
|
|
|
|
ralle14
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1877
Metawin.com
|
|
March 24, 2017, 05:27:37 PM
Last edit: March 24, 2017, 05:39:02 PM by ralle14 |
|
Hello about your challenge I just want to make it clear what's the meaning of the credits for the challenge ? Is that the bankroll or the amount of tries/lives you have for this 6-win challenge. Tailing this pick with 1 unit goodluck. |
|
|
|
|
Twipple (OP)
|
|
May 31, 2017, 10:01:45 PM |
|
BET 1 : USA MLS: Real Salt Lake vs Houston Dynamo - Betting on for Houston Dynamo -0.75.
Houston is in good form and this should not be a problem winning. Houston has had a great start to the season at home with an incredible opposite home/away split.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LuanX3
|
|
June 01, 2017, 05:38:33 PM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
michkima
|
|
June 02, 2017, 04:14:45 AM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Well it is indeed a anti-martingale, since in martin gale you get about 1 unit when you win out of a long losing streak every time. What's nice about this style is that if he does win 7 in a row, then he will profit by a lot! That's the only beauty of this. |
|
|
|
|
BlockEye
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1097
Bounty Mngr & Article Writer https://goo.gl/p4Agsh
|
|
June 02, 2017, 05:00:38 AM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Well it is indeed a anti-martingale, since in martin gale you get about 1 unit when you win out of a long losing streak every time. What's nice about this style is that if he does win 7 in a row, then he will profit by a lot! That's the only beauty of this. Yeah, But it is very risky once he hit lose 7 in a row first then his balance was emptied. Hahaha. This strategy is only advisable for those who didn't drink much coffee or any hearth attack sickness. Martingale is a risky method and anti martingale is more riskier, All newly invented strategy gets riskier. I still prefer the traditional way of betting where I choose random roll. |
|
|
|
|
|
AtlantaFive
|
|
June 02, 2017, 05:09:40 AM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Well it is indeed a anti-martingale, since in martin gale you get about 1 unit when you win out of a long losing streak every time. What's nice about this style is that if he does win 7 in a row, then he will profit by a lot! That's the only beauty of this. Yeah, But it is very risky once he hit lose 7 in a row first then his balance was emptied. Hahaha. This strategy is only advisable for those who didn't drink much coffee or any hearth attack sickness. Martingale is a risky method and anti martingale is more riskier, All newly invented strategy gets riskier. I still prefer the traditional way of betting where I choose random roll. YEah this is a risky strat and if he hits 7 loses in a row that would be the end of his bankroll but then again. If you are brave enough and don't afraid of losing maybe this strategy is for you. |
|
|
|
|
Script3d
|
|
June 02, 2017, 05:21:55 AM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Well it is indeed a anti-martingale, since in martin gale you get about 1 unit when you win out of a long losing streak every time. What's nice about this style is that if he does win 7 in a row, then he will profit by a lot! That's the only beauty of this. Yeah, But it is very risky once he hit lose 7 in a row first then his balance was emptied. Hahaha. This strategy is only advisable for those who didn't drink much coffee or any hearth attack sickness. Martingale is a risky method and anti martingale is more riskier, All newly invented strategy gets riskier. I still prefer the traditional way of betting where I choose random roll. YEah this is a risky strat and if he hits 7 loses in a row that would be the end of his bankroll but then again. If you are brave enough and don't afraid of losing maybe this strategy is for you. you guys is so wrong 1 unit of your bankroll is so small its like 1% of the total bankroll its not like you will lost all of your total bankroll at 7 lose streak , yes you might win big if you win 7 times |
|
|
|
|
|
Twipple (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2017, 12:15:12 AM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
It maybe worse. But not if you can make good bets to win 7 times in a row soon. So If I was rolling 1000 rolls then i would hit 7 times winning streak very less in normal gamble. But if my picks win sooner i can probably hit in 100. So its better. |
|
|
|
|
BlockEye
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1097
Bounty Mngr & Article Writer https://goo.gl/p4Agsh
|
|
June 08, 2017, 04:05:18 PM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Well it is indeed a anti-martingale, since in martin gale you get about 1 unit when you win out of a long losing streak every time. What's nice about this style is that if he does win 7 in a row, then he will profit by a lot! That's the only beauty of this. Yeah, But it is very risky once he hit lose 7 in a row first then his balance was emptied. Hahaha. This strategy is only advisable for those who didn't drink much coffee or any hearth attack sickness. Martingale is a risky method and anti martingale is more riskier, All newly invented strategy gets riskier. I still prefer the traditional way of betting where I choose random roll. YEah this is a risky strat and if he hits 7 loses in a row that would be the end of his bankroll but then again. If you are brave enough and don't afraid of losing maybe this strategy is for you. you guys is so wrong 1 unit of your bankroll is so small its like 1% of the total bankroll its not like you will lost all of your total bankroll at 7 lose streak , yes you might win big if you win 7 times 7 times in a row is just a representation. What I really mean is what if a long streak hits you instantly at the beginning of your betting session. This the weakness of this method and you will just end up losing if don't stop in the right timing just like the computation above. |
|
|
|
|
|
Twipple (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2017, 08:00:37 PM |
|
I won't be waiting for that to happen too long. Its not like a chance game with a massive house edge.
I am going to post my first bet of the series again today
Murray vs Wawrinka - Murray + 1.5 set
|
|
|
|
|
|
LuanX3
|
|
June 09, 2017, 04:42:11 AM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Well it is indeed a anti-martingale, since in martin gale you get about 1 unit when you win out of a long losing streak every time. What's nice about this style is that if he does win 7 in a row, then he will profit by a lot! That's the only beauty of this. Yeah, But it is very risky once he hit lose 7 in a row first then his balance was emptied. Hahaha. This strategy is only advisable for those who didn't drink much coffee or any hearth attack sickness. Martingale is a risky method and anti martingale is more riskier, All newly invented strategy gets riskier. I still prefer the traditional way of betting where I choose random roll. YEah this is a risky strat and if he hits 7 loses in a row that would be the end of his bankroll but then again. If you are brave enough and don't afraid of losing maybe this strategy is for you. you guys is so wrong 1 unit of your bankroll is so small its like 1% of the total bankroll its not like you will lost all of your total bankroll at 7 lose streak , yes you might win big if you win 7 times 7 times in a row is just a representation. What I really mean is what if a long streak hits you instantly at the beginning of your betting session. This the weakness of this method and you will just end up losing if don't stop in the right timing just like the computation above. I also just pointed out that if he loses like in the middle (3rd or 4th or whatever), he will lose 1 unit. If he wins the whole seven bets then thats huge profits. But if he lost at the 7th bet he just losses 1 unit. This strategy depletes the balance of the user if he does not stop at the right time. So, in OP's case, if he does 7 wins in a row then that is big money he won and he only risks about 1 unit per bet. |
|
|
|
|
NorrisK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 09, 2017, 07:12:45 AM |
|
I kinda like the anti martingale strategy!
The risk/reward ratio is very good imo and you only ever stand to lose 1 unit per streak.
Do you always finish the whole 7 bet string or do you sometimes top after say 3 wins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twipple (OP)
|
|
June 21, 2017, 08:44:37 PM |
|
I kinda like the anti martingale strategy!
The risk/reward ratio is very good imo and you only ever stand to lose 1 unit per streak.
Do you always finish the whole 7 bet string or do you sometimes top after say 3 wins?
I have currently set my win rate to 7 bet streak. 3 is fine too if you are following these games. But 7 is when you get the best profit. We have our first win. Tonight game is eSports - CS:GO - Hellcase CupSpartak (map 1) v Epsilon (map 1) - Match: Epsilon (map 1) -2.5 at 1.868 odds. If we win we will be at third step tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
|
Twipple (OP)
|
|
June 22, 2017, 07:35:41 PM |
|
2nd win is up  Time for our third bet in the streak Cleveland Indians @ Baltimore Orioles - Cleveland OVER 5.5 Team Total @ (-110) BOL! |
|
|
|
|
|
Twipple (OP)
|
|
June 23, 2017, 01:17:34 PM |
|
And thats our third win in the anti martingale streak.
Our 4th game is FC Dallas vs Houston Dynamo Over 2.5 goals! at 1.87 odds.
If we win this we will be very close to our final target. If you want to participate in the giveaway, now is the time.
|
|
|
|
|
mOgliE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
|
|
June 23, 2017, 02:23:45 PM |
|
Anti-martingale is worst than martin gale itself! Just to illustrate
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Lose - -8 units
Result: -1 units
Another example,
1. Win - +1 units
2. Win - +2 units
3. Win - +4 units
4. Win - +8 units
5. Win - +16 units
6. Win - +32 units
7. Lose - -64 units
Result: -1 units
In the event you lose, you'll always have -1 units.
Stupid remark. Anti martingale is the same as martingale. Both have exactly the same result. They're both as inneficient as any other gambling strategy... |
|
|
|
Bitcoingiver
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Get paid $500 to $1500+ per week
|
|
July 22, 2017, 03:08:11 PM |
|
I really like this style of gambling but the point is that someone really need to know you have the knowledge about the game before following you. That's just my point.
|
|
|
|
|
