[Bot] Automatic Signature Campaign Manager | Quality Control | Analytics | +MORE

[marcotheminer]

Hello! Once it has been perfected, the BitcoinBot signature campaign manager will be available for all campaign managers.

Quality control is possible. A manager can view a random selection of posts from the campaign members. Posts are found on one page and the name of the member who made the post can be seen and clicked to easily view their complete statistics.

Analytics are shown. Complete statistics (number of posts, in which forum board, character/word counts, and so forth) can be seen compiled in tabular and chart form.

Complete campaign control. A campaign manager can easily control all aspects of the campaign within the bot. This includes: minimum post requirements (number of posts, character counts, subforum board post count, etc.)

How much would you pay for such a bot? What features are the most wanted? Please post your comments!

If you are interested in the bot, please send me a message.

Some, not all, areas of the bot currently:

Dashboard


Details of a member


Configuration Panels



Payment Scheduling


Analytics


Ban

[webtricks]

Nice development, I congratulate you.
But I have seen many flaw in codes as reported by many participants on Tidex campaign. Hope it get resolve in future and we will see a great asset for community.
Good luck!

[coin-investor]

I don't recommend it,or you will be like the tidex campaign,people are complaining that their post are not being counted I did not received my payout   because of a small issue of misplacing my bitcoin address and the bot did not catch it,manual is still the best and we have a lot of good campaign manager who do it manually ..

[marcotheminer]

I don't recommend it,or you will be like the tidex campaign,people are complaining that their post are not being counted I did not received my payout   because of a small issue of misplacing my bitcoin address and the bot did not catch it,manual is still the best and we have a lot of good campaign manager who do it manually ..

You didn't follow the rules, that is not the bot's fault. Most members were paid.

[coin-investor]

I don't recommend it,or you will be like the tidex campaign,people are complaining that their post are not being counted I did not received my payout   because of a small issue of misplacing my bitcoin address and the bot did not catch it,manual is still the best and we have a lot of good campaign manager who do it manually ..

You didn't follow the rules, that is not the bot's fault. Most members were paid.

I post participants post are not counted properly,it's a small amount I can earn it on other campaign  I'm just giving an honest opinion about your bot with has a lot of flaw one good example is tidex your bot first campaign and the rule I did not follow was so simple and should be consider,because it's a bot it has no proper reasoning ..

[fachant]

I don't recommend it,or you will be like the tidex campaign,people are complaining that their post are not being counted I did not received my payout   because of a small issue of misplacing my bitcoin address and the bot did not catch it,manual is still the best and we have a lot of good campaign manager who do it manually ..

You didn't follow the rules, that is not the bot's fault. Most members were paid.

Problem is not in rules, and i'm not talking about tidex bot, but about all signature campaign bots. There must be manual control - Bitmixer is an example. Without Lauda this campaign was full of spammers.

[cryptocrypt]

I don't recommend it,or you will be like the tidex campaign,people are complaining that their post are not being counted I did not received my payout   because of a small issue of misplacing my bitcoin address and the bot did not catch it,manual is still the best and we have a lot of good campaign manager who do it manually ..

I think this is a good idea, it's like Bitmixer and the latest Tidex, and I see there are no significant problems such as what was mentioned above, in fact I think this will really help make it easier to manage the signature campaign. Good work.

[coin-investor]

I don't recommend it,or you will be like the tidex campaign,people are complaining that their post are not being counted I did not received my payout   because of a small issue of misplacing my bitcoin address and the bot did not catch it,manual is still the best and we have a lot of good campaign manager who do it manually ..

I think this is a good idea, it's like Bitmixer and the latest Tidex, and I see there are no significant problems such as what was mentioned above, in fact I think this will really help make it easier to manage the signature campaign. Good work.

I think you should go to tidex campaign for you to see the complaints,some participants left in the very early stage because of some of their post are not counted properly,and besides this bot will only count character not the quality of the post,it will just contribute to a lot of spam in this forum..

It will be hard for moderators because of spamming ..

[Joel_Jantsen]

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that  successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

[cryptocrypt]

I don't recommend it,or you will be like the tidex campaign,people are complaining that their post are not being counted I did not received my payout   because of a small issue of misplacing my bitcoin address and the bot did not catch it,manual is still the best and we have a lot of good campaign manager who do it manually ..

I think this is a good idea, it's like Bitmixer and the latest Tidex, and I see there are no significant problems such as what was mentioned above, in fact I think this will really help make it easier to manage the signature campaign. Good work.

I think you should go to tidex campaign for you to see the complaints,some participants left in the very early stage because of some of their post are not counted properly,and besides this bot will only count character not the quality of the post,it will just contribute to a lot of spam in this forum..

It will be hard for moderators because of spamming ..

Not really, can not be generalized as such, bitmixer have done this before and it was no problem

[fachant]

I don't recommend it,or you will be like the tidex campaign,people are complaining that their post are not being counted I did not received my payout   because of a small issue of misplacing my bitcoin address and the bot did not catch it,manual is still the best and we have a lot of good campaign manager who do it manually ..

I think this is a good idea, it's like Bitmixer and the latest Tidex, and I see there are no significant problems such as what was mentioned above, in fact I think this will really help make it easier to manage the signature campaign. Good work.

I think you should go to tidex campaign for you to see the complaints,some participants left in the very early stage because of some of their post are not counted properly,and besides this bot will only count character not the quality of the post,it will just contribute to a lot of spam in this forum..

It will be hard for moderators because of spamming ..

Not really, can not be generalized as such, bitmixer have done this before and it was no problem

Spam was no problem? Bitmixer campaign was full of spammers! If I remember correctly, Lauda remove more then 200 users from this campaign.
Without manual control bot is helpless against spammers.

But of course this kind of tool can be very helpfull in campaigns with big number of participants.

[illusioNiZt]

Well you have a really nice idea which can benefit a lot of future campaigns in many ways good luck with your project, can you post some screenshots of it? thank you.

[Aqualung89]

I think I have not encountered any problems so far, but there may be some problems that can be corrected with these updates. If the campaign manager has taken the precaution against spam, it will not be a problem for me.

[giveen]

I like the idea i may recommend you to add a feature which will automatically reject people with negative trusts and automatically decline all posts which are not the required characters eg less than 100 characters won't count. And mabye a feature like most of the gambling campaign wants there users to make some amount of posts in gambling so you can add like that if users don't make 10 posts in gambling no payout. And for a price i would recommend you to sell at 0.3 btc and some sort of secure address which the campaigner should send btc to an automated btc like an escrow so that payments can be made from that address only

[Arcteryx]

Coinroll had the same bot when they were still having users register on their application site just like this and vert similar to the one bitmixer uses. But they don't accept anymore applicants as it's a closed campaign now and for good.
Their bot seems to work and their campaigners are not complaining about having their stats show up on their own site's account page.
Payments are sent out manually but that seemed to be the only complaint but their members simply got use to those being delayed by a few days. Six days max at one point I think but that was in the middle of the campaign and not at the very start like what had happened with your product today with the last campaign using it, Tidex.
So maybe work out your bugs with devs from that campaign to make your offering of this to all campaigns a more perfect product.
Only suggesting this to you since you ran the bit-x (coinsbank) signature campaign and that was one of the best and longest running ones on here.
I couldn't even get in there with people being very pleased with how that was run by you and bitboy$.
So you know how these should run from the inside out and are the only one who can actually come out with a solid product for all signature campaign managers to use.

[marcotheminer]

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that  successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

The bot randomly selects a number of posts from enrolled members, which are displayed on one page in text form for a manager to quickly scan through. If spam is noticed, the manager can click on the member to confirm a suspicion and remove, ban, or penalise the member.

[marcotheminer]

Coinroll had the same bot when they were still having users register on their application site just like this and vert similar to the one bitmixer uses. But they don't accept anymore applicants as it's a closed campaign now and for good.
Their bot seems to work and their campaigners are not complaining about having their stats show up on their own site's account page.
Payments are sent out manually but that seemed to be the only complaint but their members simply got use to those being delayed by a few days. Six days max at one point I think but that was in the middle of the campaign and not at the very start like what had happened with your product today with the last campaign using it, Tidex.
So maybe work out your bugs with devs from that campaign to make your offering of this to all campaigns a more perfect product.
Only suggesting this to you since you ran the bit-x (coinsbank) signature campaign and that was one of the best and longest running ones on here.
I couldn't even get in there with people being very pleased with how that was run by you and bitboy$.
So you know how these should run from the inside out and are the only one who can actually come out with a solid product for all signature campaign managers to use.

Thank you. My experience as a campaign manager does provide the knowledge needed to create a well-rounded and useful (and functioning) bot.

[marcotheminer]

Well you have a really nice idea which can benefit a lot of future campaigns in many ways good luck with your project, can you post some screenshots of it? thank you.

Some, not all, areas of the bot currently:

Dashboard


Details of a member


Configuration Panels



Payment Scheduling


Analytics


Ban

[LTU_btc]

Is it the same bot which was used on Coinsbank signature campaign? If I remember correctly, there was some complaints that users didn't get payouts on time or their posts were counted incorrectly. If there are no bugs anymore it's great. Coinsbank was one of the best signature campaigns on bitcointalk.
And even if campaign are runned by bot, most important part is to have good mannager. Best example of it is Bitmixer: earlier it had tons of spammers, but when Lauda started to manage it, mostly shitposters were removed.

[marcotheminer]

Is it the same bot which was used on Coinsbank signature campaign? If I remember correctly, there was some complaints that users didn't get payouts on time or their posts were counted incorrectly. If there are no bugs anymore it's great. Coinsbank was one of the best signature campaigns on bitcointalk.
And even if campaign are runned by bot, most important part is to have good mannager. Best example of it is Bitmixer: earlier it had tons of spammers, but when Lauda started to manage it, mostly shitposters were removed.

The bot has been re-coded, but yes it is similar to the Coinsbank campaign bot in features and operational ability! We may still encounter problems as with any application (none yet thankfully!), they will be tackled the moment, if, they arise.