Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 08:05:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2017-03-21] Bitcoin Stabilizes After 3-Day Nosedive  (Read 219 times)
bitlamp (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 22, 2017, 05:34:23 AM
 #1

http://cdn.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/tsys-bitcoin-digital-currencies.jpg

Three days into what can only be termed a rout, shares of bitcoin have stabilized — if we accept the skewed maxim that one day’s trading makes a trend.

Reuters noted Monday that the digital currency gained at least some traction, after the previous three sessions slammed pricing to its lowest level since 2015. The peak seems far away, at $1,350. It came a week ago as there had been hopes among traders that the currency would be listed as part of an ETF. Conventional wisdom holds that such a listing would boost liquidity and transparency. Yet the bid for listing was denied by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which cited unregulated markets.

Thus the low came on Saturday to $944 per bitcoin. The Winklevoss twins, who had been looking to list those ETF shares, said efforts would continue.

The newswire also said that there have been disputes centering around the “blocks” in which bitcoin trades. That may leave the door open for inroads to be made by ether and other rival currencies. The former currency, ether, has tripled in value over the past month. Some observers have said that trading involved selling bitcoin, while buying ether.

http://www.pymnts.com/news/bitcoin-tracker/2017/bitcoin-stabilizes-after-3-day-nosedive-bitcoin-price/
zby
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1594
Merit: 1001


View Profile
March 22, 2017, 07:51:54 AM
 #2

" three sessions slammed pricing to its lowest level since 2015" - hmm really?

the stabilization news is on the same level of accuracy
1Referee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427


View Profile
March 22, 2017, 11:16:59 AM
 #3

Horrible article. Once again an article just published for the sake of generating ad revenue. It's very difficult nowadays to find decent articles regarding Bitcoin. I all the time stumble over the noobish'ness of those that come up with nonsense analysis and also things that simply aren't true. Aren't these article writers supposed to fact-check their article first before publishing?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!