Bitcoin Unlimited Got Nothing To Do With Bitcoin It's Just An Altcoin It's A SCA

[Vito Corleone]

People why you are buying Bitcoin Unlimited?
It got nothing to do with Bitcoin!

Roger Ver created Altcoin "Bitcoin Unlimited" and Bitcoin will never be hardforked!

We have hunders of altcoins better than "Bitcoin Unlimted" and just because some asshole advertise Bitcoin Unlimited as an hardfork of Bitcoin people invest money in this shit.

This shit is a biggest scam.

First i liked Roger Ver, he said that he want to solve slow confirmation time, tranaction costs, but analysing more it's just an Altcoin, it's a copy of Bitcoin and it's changed only a little bit, even Dash instaminers programmed much better code...

This "Bitcoin Ulimited" shit stolen 300$ from original Bitcoin.

It will never be hardforked and this asshole just scammed all of us!!!

If you want to do good things for original  Bitcoin then work with original Bitcoin project  and stop creating SHIT WE DON"T NEED!

[1714600815]

1714600815

[1714600815]

1714600815

[1714600815]

1714600815

[Vito Corleone]

If he really would want to help for Bitcoin then he would support Segwit and donate for development, instead of supporting Real Bitcoin he created fake Bitcoin and advertise it as an hardork, he is just trying to steal what Satoshi Nakamoto and Original Bitcoin did in 10 years.

[franky1]

segwit is a complete rewrite and requirs people to move funds to diffreny keypairs..

block formation, tx and cobebase does not match the original bitcoin.
it wants to be incorporated without even nodes vote.

seems segwit is the altcoin and dynamics (of any brand) currently running on the main net is just a possible upgrade that people can accept or reject.

BU for instance has been running for 2 years has set no deadlines, made no threats and has not even screamed to change the algo.

yet segwit has.
if anything, its segwits drama and tantrums which have affected things like peoples speculation of the price. by making deadlines bribes, blackmails and threats.
oh remember who made the exchange announcement.. yep segwit supporters calling bu an alt.
oh remember who wants to pull the bilaterate split granade.. yep segwit supporters
ph remember who decided segwit should be voted by pools and not full community.. yep segwit supporters..

all while the dynamic block implementations prod along doing nothing just letting people have an open free decentralised choice of atleast half a dozen implementations/brands that are compatible..

but wait. segwit wants only blockstream(core) to be king.. says alot about which choice is actually open diverse and decentralised.

[Iranus]

If he really would want to help for Bitcoin then he would support Segwit and donate for development, instead of supporting Real Bitcoin he created fake Bitcoin and advertise it as an hardork, he is just trying to steal what Satoshi Nakamoto and Original Bitcoin did in 10 years.

If he really wanted to help, he would talk to Core about a compromise involving the continuation of Bitcoin as BTC but with changes to Core's code.  I don't think that Core have handled this very well.

Bitcoin might well not get a hard fork, but I think that the OP's post isn't particularly reasonable.  The claim that it "stole" $300 from Bitcoin is particularly strange - Bitcoin's price going down is not bad for everyone and for someone to sell someone else has to buy, knowing that the value will go up in the long term.  For some groups it's very positive, such as day traders who profit from the volatility.

This seems to be an attack on hard forks in general rather than Bitcoin Unlimited - Bitcoin Unlimited is bad because it's wrought with bugs, increasing the block size won't be good for everything and because the split of value between regular Bitcoin and a BU coin will be very strange and volatile.  But you don't mention this at all - you could equally call any other hard fork a theft of its original form.

[jonald_fyookball]

First i liked Roger Ver, he said that he want to solve slow confirmation time, tranaction costs,  

 
Roger Ver is absolutely AGAINST slow confirmation times and high costs.

Guess who is making Bitcoin have slow confirmation times and high costs -- its Core...because of their refusal
for several years to raise the blocksize.  Some of them openly say these are good things.
 
If you don't like BU, there's bitcoinEC.info

Regardless of what solution is chosen, it won't be an altcoin if there's consensus.

[franky1]

If he really would want to help for Bitcoin then he would support Segwit and donate for development, instead of supporting Real Bitcoin he created fake Bitcoin and advertise it as an hardork, he is just trying to steal what Satoshi Nakamoto and Original Bitcoin did in 10 years.

If he really wanted to help, he would talk to Core about a compromise involving the continuation of Bitcoin as BTC but with changes to Core's code.  I don't think that Core have handled this very well.

consensus meeting december 2015
segwit +2mb hardfork
compromised agreed

early 2016 core devs backtracked and renigged.. by pretended to be just janitors and not involved with contributing to core..

P.S core did not exist prior to 2013 - core do not own bitcoin. they are just one brand amungst many, that use bitcoin. not own it

P.S segwit was an altcoin running under the blockstream-elements brand from 2014-mid 2016....

[Vito Corleone]

First i liked Roger Ver, he said that he want to solve slow confirmation time, tranaction costs,  

 
Roger Ver is absolutely AGAINST slow confirmation times and high costs.

Guess who is making Bitcoin have slow confirmation times and high costs -- its Core...because of their refusal
for several years to raise the blocksize.  Some of them openly say these are good things.
 
If you don't like BU, there's bitcoinEC.info

Regardless of what solution is chosen, it won't be an altcoin if there's consensus.

Then Bitcoin Core developers assholes also, only for these problems they allow to compete Bitcoin Unlimited and Dash with Bitcoin.

Everyone can contribute to Bitcoin source code, but who has the rights to edit Bitcoin core?

[jonald_fyookball]

First i liked Roger Ver, he said that he want to solve slow confirmation time, tranaction costs,  

 
Roger Ver is absolutely AGAINST slow confirmation times and high costs.

Guess who is making Bitcoin have slow confirmation times and high costs -- its Core...because of their refusal
for several years to raise the blocksize.  Some of them openly say these are good things.
 
If you don't like BU, there's bitcoinEC.info

Regardless of what solution is chosen, it won't be an altcoin if there's consensus.

Then Bitcoin Core developers assholes also, only for these problems they allow to compete Bitcoin Unlimited and Dash with Bitcoin.

Everyone can contribute to Bitcoin source code, but who has the rights to edit Bitcoin core?

only a few people like 3-4 guys...the 'big guy's like Pieter W. , Wladimir der Lan, etc who have the Github priviledges.  I dont know the current list.