I’m thinking about this for few weeks and my speculation is:
1. Good project but need a strong marketing infrastructure, not only to compete against Storj but also a good alternative to consolidate storage companies.
2. If a lot of people use Sia's technology, it will appear some bugs that maybe they aren’t detected now. This step is very important because Sia will be perfectioned.
3. If bitcoin rises like a lot of people say (1BTC: $3000 for example) it will affect all cryptocoins and the usd because today 120 sat are very cheap, but in one year, 120 sat will be more usd. Maybe there are people that have 50.000 SC and they are waiting for every coin gets $10 expecting $500.000/268BTC… but I think bitcoin needs to increases a lot for that. And I don’t think Sia gets that value. Think about that, is a good deal, if arrive this price, do you prefer hold or sell… mmmm? Remember LTC, BTC, ETH… And what will be the final use of SC? Only for storage? I think SC can’t compare with other crypto that are used for transactions. Every coin has their function, and maybe people confuse/associates the value of some coins with their technology (see XRP).
4. I think the future of Sia will be great and need to be important and useful for people. Don’t think in Dropbox, think in Sia or Storj. This is the line that they need to cross. But now, people aren’t concerned about centralization and privacity (facebook, the great example). And markets only want to invest in coins for this afternoon (money, money, money…)
5. The question is: Where Sia's team want to go in terms of markets, why do you think 1SC needs to increases until $10?
(Hey! If SC rises until 10$ I will be very happy. It means storage our data/privacity will be more important than our money... or not?
)