Bitcoin Forum
July 19, 2018, 03:54:14 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What is the problem with gorsuch?  (Read 595 times)
Masha Sha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 02, 2017, 04:21:50 AM
 #1

 Huh Litterate, not stupid, half funny, eloquent...

/sarc /snowflakeshield /iammorevirtuousthanyou /2692 /pixelsonscreeen
1532015654
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532015654

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532015654
Reply with quote  #2

1532015654
Report to moderator
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1532015654
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532015654

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532015654
Reply with quote  #2

1532015654
Report to moderator
Sithara007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1013


★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile
April 02, 2017, 04:24:51 AM
 #2

There is no problem with Gorsuch (at least for the normal people). But for radical leftists, his nomination will be a disaster. Their wet-dreams of having a solid liberal majority in the SCOTUS now lies in tatters.

HabBear
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 593


View Profile
April 02, 2017, 05:25:22 AM
 #3

Why? (Not being sarcastic, given our past history)

You usually have tons of background information, I figure it's not different on your thoughts here.

There is no problem with Gorsuch (at least for the normal people). But for radical leftists, his nomination will be a disaster. Their wet-dreams of having a solid liberal majority in the SCOTUS now lies in tatters.

darkseid1199
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 02, 2017, 04:17:14 PM
 #4

I am glad a conservative is going to the Supreme and i hope some Liberal judges retire soon. The Liberals there are going to be the downfall of the USA.
Spendulus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1011



View Profile
April 02, 2017, 06:20:59 PM
 #5

There is no problem with Gorsuch (at least for the normal people). But for radical leftists, his nomination will be a disaster. Their wet-dreams of having a solid liberal majority in the SCOTUS now lies in tatters.

But protesting, filibustering, or whining is not going to change things. Gorsuch will be put in place, and that's that. 

"Liberal" seems to mean one that will side with whatever way the winds are blowing in the current liberal crowd.  In other words, a judge that's been bought and paid for.

That's what it's come to.
Sithara007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1013


★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile
April 03, 2017, 06:25:48 AM
 #6

I am glad a conservative is going to the Supreme and i hope some Liberal judges retire soon. The Liberals there are going to be the downfall of the USA.

They will die off, if they don't retire. The rabid liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg is suffering from terminal cancer and is inching closer to death. Another liberal judge who about to die is Stephen Breyer, who is 78 years old. I hope that at least one of these two will die before 2018 December.

freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1023


Activity: 9001 == OP


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2017, 09:19:13 AM
 #7

If the democrats wanted to gamble they could always retire a different justice and make it a dual-nomination
Gorsuch + Garland but they probably think its worth risking 2020 and hoping people have 2020 on Trump ^^.

BITEX
            ███     ███     ███
              ███     ███     ███
                ███     ███     ███
                  ███     ███     ███
                    ███     ███     ███
                      ███     ███     ███
                        ███     ███     ███
                          ███     ███     ███
                            ███     ███     ███
                              ███     ███     ███
                            ███     ███     ███
                          ███     ███     ███
                        ███     ███     ███
                      ███     ███     ███
                    ███     ███     ███
                  ███     ███     ███
                ███     ███     ███
              ███     ███     ███
            ███     ███     ███

The First Locally-Embedded, Yet Global, Crypto-Bank
TELEGRAM    FACEBOOK   TWITTER    YOUTUBE    LINE

                  ███     ███     ███
                ███     ███     ███
              ███     ███     ███
            ███     ███     ███
          ███     ███     ███
        ███     ███     ███
      ███     ███     ███
    ███     ███     ███
  ███     ███     ███
███     ███     ███
  ███     ███     ███
    ███     ███     ███
      ███     ███     ███
        ███     ███     ███
          ███     ███     ███
            ███     ███     ███
              ███     ███     ███
               ███     ███     ███
                 ███     ███     ███

WHITEPAPER | ANN
50% discount pre-ICO NOW!
Sithara007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1013


★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile
April 04, 2017, 03:18:22 AM
 #8

If the democrats wanted to gamble they could always retire a different justice and make it a dual-nomination
Gorsuch + Garland but they probably think its worth risking 2020 and hoping people have 2020 on Trump ^^.

The Democrats can only blame themselves. They should have asked Darth Vader Ginsburg to resign, while Obama was still in the office. Instead of that, they were waiting for the Democrat majority in the senate. Ginsburg is only a few months away from death, and Trump is going to replace her with Ted Cruz.

tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1004


View Profile
April 04, 2017, 04:08:52 AM
 #9


Steve Pieczenik has some choice words about Gorsuch (and neocons, Trump's psychology, etc, etc.)  Unfortunately it's an Alex Jones interview and the guy interrupts like crazy...especially when he is not terribly happy with the interview-ee's ideas perhaps?  Anyway, Pieczenik is concise enough in his presentation that a viewer can get something out of it anyway.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6mTzTqE838

If Pieczenik's research is close to accurate, picking Gorsuch doesn't bode well for what Trump (or his handlers) have in mind for the direction of the country.  Roberts was rumored to be a die-hard corporatist while he was being considered.  When he was installed it became clear that the rumors were dead-on, and he outperformed even the more dire of the predictions.  There is no reason to be very hopeful that the same kind of thing won't be the case with Gorsuch.  Oh well.


Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!