Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 11:52:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Lockbox Spend Error - TypeError: getSpendableBalance() takes exactly 1 argument  (Read 352 times)
ibrightly (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 05, 2017, 09:29:55 PM
Last edit: April 05, 2017, 10:16:00 PM by ibrightly
 #1

I'm running a newly installed Armory 95.1 on Ubuntu 16.04.2 setup. I've just setup a multi-sig lockbox and ran into the following error on a test send:

"TypeError: getSpendableBalance() takes exactly 1 argument (3 given)"

Any guesses? Relevant log is below:

Code:
2017-04-05 17:01 (ERROR) -- Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/armory/ui/MultiSigDialogs.py", line 1809, in doSpend
    dlg = DlgSendBitcoins(None, self, self.main, spendFromLockboxID=lbID)
  File "/usr/lib/armory/qtdialogs.py", line 5006, in __init__
    spendFromLockboxID=spendFromLockboxID)
  File "/usr/lib/armory/ui/TxFrames.py", line 136, in __init__
    self.lbox.uniqueIDB58)
  File "/usr/lib/armory/ui/WalletFrames.py", line 66, in __init__
    bal = self.cppWlt.getSpendableBalance(TheBDM.getTopBlockHeight(), IGNOREZC)
TypeError: getSpendableBalance() takes exactly 1 argument (3 given)

Full log is here: https://zerobin.net/?7fe18bc2cd8a0ba2#bJTIdxkNyrsiI5/4lPWVttECTWVaupwAniKhT/GVFcg=

[edit] I tried this on a spare machine running Armory 95.1 on Windows 7 x64. Same error.

1715255565
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715255565

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715255565
Reply with quote  #2

1715255565
Report to moderator
1715255565
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715255565

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715255565
Reply with quote  #2

1715255565
Report to moderator
1715255565
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715255565

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715255565
Reply with quote  #2

1715255565
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715255565
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715255565

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715255565
Reply with quote  #2

1715255565
Report to moderator
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 1347

Armory Developer


View Profile
April 05, 2017, 10:34:00 PM
 #2

Known bug, fixed in 0.96

ibrightly (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 05, 2017, 11:51:53 PM
 #3

Known bug, fixed in 0.96

Thanks. I rolled back to 0.94.1 and seem to be up and running.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!