They found Satoshi

[iamnotback]

Friends this isn't a joke...

Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!

Read this!

He is dead, and to me it appears they firebombed his taxi.  

[1714281395]

1714281395

[1714281395]

1714281395

[1714281395]

1714281395

[1714281395]

1714281395

[iamnotback]

More discussion over at this other thread. Many are saying this might crash the price of BTC. I never thought of it that way. Do you all think so?

Re: They found Satoshi?

@OP you may have put so much time to make that evidence but for me non of them are convincing. And i think many other also feel same about your evidence.

Here we go again! another serious research thing about Satoshi? but your research was quite accepting with the evidence you have presented and the number of time he is involve in certain and major transaction between different country that will certainly pump up is idea currency and presenting the good benefits it has with the economy, I think you had a point in your research but there are still a big question mark in these, the real truth if Nash really is Satoshi? well one man can not certainly take a step in saying it and change our beliefs right?

No my evidence is based on the timing that he wasn't active publicly presenting was precisely the timing when Satoshi was active publicly.

And also on the focus of his Agencies game theory research being exactly what was needed to see the way from Szabo and Wei Dai's work to Satoshi's PoW solution.

And also because the timing when he went silent to work on coding Bitcoin was right about the time that Szabo (re-)published his bit gold, which was probably the key development that gave Nash the final insight on how to apply his Agencies research to his ideal money concept. Then the evidence shows he went quiet at that time, until right before he launched Bitcoin.

Nash's Agencies research was on Cooperation in Non-Cooperating Repeated Games, which is precisely what Satoshi's PoW is!

It all fits far too well.

You guys are too lazy to read carefully what I wrote in the linked research.

[Spoetnik]

Hmm would that make BTC go up or down ?
I would guess it would make it go up rather than down myself.
Having lost coins forever would make investors feel more secure than knowing they are out there for the dumping.

I see some interesting info but i am not sure it's a smoking gun.
I also see a lot of conspiracy theories.

[Zadicar]

Nah dont mind on reading the link and im done with these claims anytime that they found satoshi and now dead or some people claiming that they are satoshi.I really dont believe such bluffs that do circulating on this cryptoworld as long the price is climbing up i dont really care at all on those things.

[iamnotback]

Nah dont mind on reading the link and im done with these claims anytime that they found satoshi and now dead or some people claiming that they are satoshi.I really dont believe such bluffs that do circulating on this cryptoworld as long the price is climbing up i dont really care at all on those things.

Aren't you curious about the thinking of the Satoshi? We get new insights into his thinking now that we know with high confidence that Satoshi was John Nash, the 86 year old mathematician who won a Nobel prize and the most prestigious Abel award.

For me it is a very intellectually interesting discovery. It opens a whole new realm of learning about and thinking about Nash's theories.

[Zadicar]

Nah dont mind on reading the link and im done with these claims anytime that they found satoshi and now dead or some people claiming that they are satoshi.I really dont believe such bluffs that do circulating on this cryptoworld as long the price is climbing up i dont really care at all on those things.

Aren't you curious about the thinking of the Satoshi? We get new insights into his thinking now that we know with high confidence that Satoshi was John Nash, the 86 year old mathematician who won a Nobel prize and the most prestigious Abel award.

For me it is a very intellectually interesting discovery. It opens a whole new realm of learning about and thinking about Nash's theories.

I really love to see new discoveries and i do really like to know whos satoshi and i know most bitcoin users have the same way of thinking but news popping out everywhere about they are satoshi,i dont really feel any excitement to seek out if its true or not.Well its just my own view and anyone could really believe anything they want

[Ayers]

NO evidence can be better than satoshi signing his address, if he can't anymore, there no way you can prove that john nash is satoshi, this https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2gzoxa/john_nash_is_satoshi_nakamoto/ all other way to say he is or he is not satoshi are pure speculation, and also satoshi stopped posting here in 2010, his last post was in 2010, that guy die in 2015, too much time between the last post and his death, i don't believe that he was satoshi

[BitcoinNational]

[republicrypto]

some people say that Satoshi nakamoto is Nick Szabo that found Bit Gold,,

and now you say satoshi is John Nash,,

and with all the reason that you mentioned above in your link,, that can be yes,,
But, For now isn't important to know , who is he ?
The most important think is to keep his idea stay alive,
because Bitcoin is more than money,, it is revolusionary

[d.kevin29]

some people say that Satoshi nakamoto is Nick Szabo that found Bit Gold,,

and now you say satoshi is John Nash,,

and with all the reason that you mentioned above in your link,, that can be yes,,
But, For now isn't important to know , who is he ?
The most important think is to keep his idea stay alive,
because Bitcoin is more than money,, it is revolusionary

Bad, BAD idea to look for him.

First of all, he wanted to stay anonymous and he probably still does. Why look for someone who made such a revolutionary idea that wants to now stay in the shadow? If he made it and wanted to remain hidden, he has a reason to do so.

Finding out about him will make Bitcoin fall. Why? Because we will likely then find out whether the richest Bitcoin addresses are his, and if they aren't, we are in the 'danger' of getting Bitcoin dumped at any time. In the next second of finding that out, the price either skyrockets or falls to <$500. Then we will also find out about his history: what he had done, what he is doing right now, and who did he work with. People, including me, are interested in ANONYMOUS currencies just to feel free and private. Most of us here are also conspirationists, except the investors that came here just to make money. If I would find out that this guy had worked with FBI in his life, it'd scare me away from using Bitcoin and I'd sell all.

It's not a good idea. Just my opinion though. If this guy is the real Satoshi, we're in 50-50 chance of either becoming rich or getting half of our funds taken away by the price falling.

[dfd1]

Who cares? Where your bitcoin killer?

[generalizethis]

It bugs me that John Nash died due to a car accident. Few weeks ago I read that the CIA can use cars to assassinate people. Coincidence?

Read some more and apparently John Nash died because the taxi driver "lost control of his car". This is too scary to be a coincidence.

Why kill him after he created it? The damage (if perceived that way) is done and you are adding potential blowback to the situation by killing a beloved and famous figure.

Not saying it didn't happen, but am saying it doesn't necessarily make sense for a rational actor unless the timing has a rational explanation.

[Wapinter]

Some of arguments given in this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1837136.msg18502866#msg18502866 to prove that Nash is Satoshi are too ridiculous like this one.
" Satoshi often used British English and
we should note that John Nash had
previously left the USA and lived in the
UK for many years. And the posting
time of Satoshi (presuming he was
sleeping when not posting) indicated
he would be where Nash was located
in the USA..
1.Now a lot of people either use British English ir American English.
2.I mostly get online after 1 am when most of my countrymen are sleeping, does it means I am not residing in where i am?

[iamTom123]

I think it would not really matter who can be the real Satoshi Nakamoto is. I agree that because he made himself anonymous should be telling us that he does not want anybody to find out who can be the real person is behind such a famous name. In the end, the market will not be reacting to this just another conspiracy theory. Unless there can be more solid evidence confirming the real personality behind Satoshi, I would say that let the man remain unknown even forever.

[raven7886]

Also John Nash has already been considered as Satoshi Nakomoto before and it has been debunked many times over the years.

Just because he has a relatively similar topics he academically worked on doesn’t mean he is Satoshi. There are millions of academics out there in the World, one would eventually do something similar to Satoshi.

[iamnotback]

Also John Nash has already been considered as Satoshi Nakomoto before and it has been debunked many times over the years.

My evidence is new and very solid. Please stop your FUD.

[iamnotback]

Who cares? Where your bitcoin killer?

Who cares what you have to say?

[dfd1]

Who cares? Where your bitcoin killer?

Who cares what you have to say?

To all future followers of this preacher.
This is not insane idiot, this is a very sane guy and he preparing a scam, making himself "a star" for attention economy we have in internet these days.
And, of course, he will ask for donations soon and will never deliver anything besides promises.
   

[Nashamoto]

Friends this isn't a joke...

Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!

Read this!

He is dead, and to me it appears they firebombed his taxi.  

Why would they kill him, he was an old guy, not active anymore

[Mr.Charlie]

Also John Nash has already been considered as Satoshi Nakomoto before and it has been debunked many times over the years.

My evidence is new and very solid. Please stop your FUD.

ok, i know ive busted your balls before...just having fun but you really are onto something here.