If you believe we should kill all Muslims...

[saddampbuh]

who wants to kill them? just get them the hell out of my country.

[Spendulus]

....
You have to kill the idea not the people who got sucked into the con.

Muslims are the victims of the Islamic ideology.

Killing the victims will accomplish nothing.

Expose the nonsense Quran/Hadiths teach.  The founder of the religion flew to 'heaven' on a winged horse in the middle of the night, nobody saw it, yet someone wrote about it.  That should tell you everything you need to know.

Stupid Fatwas!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waQ9ZFdlFBQ

[Spendulus]

....
You have to kill the idea not the people who got sucked into the con.

Muslims are the victims of the Islamic ideology.

Killing the victims will accomplish nothing.

Expose the nonsense Quran/Hadiths teach.  The founder of the religion flew to 'heaven' on a winged horse in the middle of the night, nobody saw it, yet someone wrote about it.  That should tell you everything you need to know.

Stupid Fatwas!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waQ9ZFdlFBQ

[BADecker]

Haha, who do you think runs the war on terror from America? Christians.

And how much faith do Christians put into science vs. religion?

Your comments are hypocritical, but I appreciate hearing them. Feels like you've talked yourself into a catch 22.

It's funny You Muslims can never be as smart as us westerners you will always follow our technology ..
You will always behind us in tech..
WHY YOU ASK?..Well think about it..

If you start learning science your people will know Islam is a total lie and as time goes on ISLAM IS DEAD.

Because Science wakes you up and you will know because of science that religion is a complete lie.

A few truths but so as star wars or harry potter ..< true train station but no magic wall..

Now if Arabs want to become ATHEIST THEN WELCOME TO REALITY ..
Because science will do this ..You will become a none believer of sky daddies ..

SO I WIN WIN WIN ..No science you are dumb..With science no religion ..I WIN..

And how much faith do Christians put into science vs. religion?
                         ^^^^^^^^^         
                       You said it  FAITH< To hope it's true but not knowing it is  < FAITH..
Islam < believes it's fact < Not faith but truth < liar brainwashed deluded

I have faith in my bets< I would be deluded to think it's fact i will win..FAITH..


NOW DO MOST ISLAMIC'S HAVE FAITH?< I hope there is a god when i die < FAITH.

Remember like my bet ..
Now religion is 1 big bet 
You are betting on your existence that if you do right on your bet you will go to an after life..
I.E follow an imaginary sky person rules  so you go to heaven.

Now when i bet i can see what i am betting on  ..
With religion you cannot see what your betting on so you already lost..
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOUR BETTING ON..RELIGION..

And i thought  in ISLAM you are not allowed to gamble ..

But nobody has the faintest clue as to what you won.     

[leopard2]

who wants to kill them? just get them the hell out of my country.

THIS.

I am sick and tired of the terrorist threat, but also of the victim attitude most people take in the EU. We do not need to help, discuss, understand, kill, or invite refugees, we only want to be left alone and enjoy life.  

Build a fucking 300ft wall, mines, cameras, machine guns around Europe and Canada/US. Where there is water, treat any unlicensed entry into our waters like an armed attack, and open fire after a couple of warning rounds.

Anyone who is not a EU citizen and is suspicious? No problem. Just shove them thru a gate, and whatever happens outside the wall is not our fucking business.

Problem solved.  

[Creepings]

You are also aa terrorist if you want to kill the government after killing your dad or uncle. You are fighting agaisnt the government and these is treason, I think if you did not kill the government, you will be jail or either go to a terrorist camp and be one of them. And if you think like these; if someone killed your family, would it be really great if you just cry and not kill the killers if you know that there will be a chain of hate

[Lancusters]

who wants to kill them? just get them the hell out of my country.

And as they can now be removed from the country? It was easy to start up, but it will be difficult to expel. I think that now you can not only let new refugees. And those who are already in the country for the slightest violation should be deported.

[BADecker]

who wants to kill them? just get them the hell out of my country.

THIS.

I am sick and tired of the terrorist threat, but also of the victim attitude most people take in the EU. We do not need to help, discuss, understand, kill, or invite refugees, we only want to be left alone and enjoy life.  

Build a fucking 300ft wall, mines, cameras, machine guns around Europe and Canada/US. Where there is water, treat any unlicensed entry into our waters like an armed attack, and open fire after a couple of warning rounds.

Anyone who is not a EU citizen and is suspicious? No problem. Just shove them thru a gate, and whatever happens outside the wall is not our fucking business.

Problem solved.  

The problem with this is, the Government would enlist the aid of the Muslims outside the wall, to keep us inside, as slaves.

[Sithara007]

who wants to kill them? just get them the hell out of my country.

And as they can now be removed from the country? It was easy to start up, but it will be difficult to expel. I think that now you can not only let new refugees. And those who are already in the country for the slightest violation should be deported.

Do you think that deporting refugees is that easy? Most of them don't have passports, and even if they do they can't be deported because they hail from "dangerous" countries such as Somalia and Syria. An example here:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3672387/Convicted-Somalian-rapist-overturned-deportation-order-raped-two-vulnerable-women.html

[Mometaskers]

Don't kill Muslims. Kill Islam.

Islam is a governmental religion that the vast majority of Muslims do not follow even close to correctly. Islam is a religion of violence. But most Muslims and Muslim clerics have already almost destroyed it by turning it into a religion of peace.

Help Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way by freeing them from the violent requirements of their religion.

Don't kill the Muslims. Rather, help the Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way.

I doubt the religion can be killed. Many said Christianity would die out but it seems to be seeing a resurgence. What we should be doing is help them get through their own "reformation" if that is even possible. Granted, Reformation really didn't eliminate religion being problematic (just look at Protestant vs Catholic conflicts in the past) but it's a start. Weaken the hold of the clergy over the smallfolk.

Reformation would also allow a flourishing of new sects. Considering that most people are moderate anyway, they'd probably go along with moderate sects and there might be more moderate sects to begin with.

When religion have to compete in the free market of faith, they adapt to the people rather than force the people to submit to their will.

My reasoning is very simple. I don't want to live near Muslims. Not all of them may be terrorists or terrorist supporters, but the vast majority of the terrorists are Muslims. My logic is that, prevention is better than cure. Why take the risk?

BTW... I don't want to kill any of them, as long as they don't attack me.

I also don't want to live near them. Not that I believe they are all bad but their level of tribal mentality is disturbing. You're always worrying you might offend someone. And it's not like I would be able to live near them in the first place. They tend to form ghettos which in time become a no-go for infidels.

[Barmen]

who wants to kill them? just get them the hell out of my country.

And as they can now be removed from the country? It was easy to start up, but it will be difficult to expel. I think that now you can not only let new refugees. And those who are already in the country for the slightest violation should be deported.

Do you think that deporting refugees is that easy? Most of them don't have passports, and even if they do they can't be deported because they hail from "dangerous" countries such as Somalia and Syria. An example here:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3672387/Convicted-Somalian-rapist-overturned-deportation-order-raped-two-vulnerable-women.html

Let him go to Somalia and Syria. I have them all brought into the neutral zone and let what you want to do. That's their problem. Why they are needed in Europe without passports.

[popcorn1]

who wants to kill them? just get them the hell out of my country.

THIS.

I am sick and tired of the terrorist threat, but also of the victim attitude most people take in the EU. We do not need to help, discuss, understand, kill, or invite refugees, we only want to be left alone and enjoy life.  

Build a fucking 300ft wall, mines, cameras, machine guns around Europe and Canada/US. Where there is water, treat any unlicensed entry into our waters like an armed attack, and open fire after a couple of warning rounds.

Anyone who is not a EU citizen and is suspicious? No problem. Just shove them thru a gate, and whatever happens outside the wall is not our fucking business.

Problem solved.  

The problem with this is, the Government would enlist the aid of the Muslims outside the wall, to keep us inside, as slaves.

Oh so your not that crazy after all ..

Oh i forgot NO WE SHOULD NEVER JUST KILL MUSLIMS..We should just show them the ways of an ATHEIST LIFE science is to be studied rather than the Koran..
BUT if they so insist on killing us because they want sharia law  THEN WE MUST WIPE OUT EVERY MUSLIM WHO THINKS THIS..

So if you want sharia law then yes we should kill every last one of them..EVERY LAST ONE..

But mild muslims that just think like my parents protestant ..I.E well could be a god but not worth worrying about ..Then they all should live..

If you think SHARIA LAW should rule our lives ..THEN ALL SHOULD BE WIPED OF THIS PLANET..

[grenade launcher]

Not all Muslims are terrorists. We just need to teach their children to the world from childhood. Murder will not lead to anything good, because there are terrorists among other religions. Violence breeds violence.

[BADecker]

Kill Islam, not Muslims. Then move the Muslims to Western Sahara (which isn't listed on the maps for about 2 years, now). This would leave most of the Middle East, and much of Africa open for the migration of peaceful people.

Just a thought.

[popcorn1]

Not all Muslims are terrorists. We just need to teach their children to the world from childhood. Murder will not lead to anything good, because there are terrorists among other religions. Violence breeds violence.

Yes so ban all religion .Study science instead of studying word for word a book that does no good what so ever..
Do you learn how to fix a car reading the KORAN or bible? or even bake a cake to sell to the masses?.

It teaches you to be a DUMB ASS ..Who talks about bullshit that's not even real ..

You are getting angry over a goblin story ..

You say anything about SUPERMAN and your dead ..NO SERIOUSLY you say something about superman and your dead .

He got more morals than the bible or the koran and the jewish bible put together..HE SAVE THE WORLD   SUPERMAN..

Look at your window he might come and save the day..Superman

[Souldream]

Why should we kill all the muslims???
Just because most of them are terrorist that doesn't mean that all of them are the same,
I think it isn't just the muslims who can commit an act of terrorism.

[kodoll]

Don't kill Muslims. Kill Islam.

Islam is a governmental religion that the vast majority of Muslims do not follow even close to correctly. Islam is a religion of violence. But most Muslims and Muslim clerics have already almost destroyed it by turning it into a religion of peace.

Help Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way by freeing them from the violent requirements of their religion.

Don't kill the Muslims. Rather, help the Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way.

I doubt the religion can be killed. Many said Christianity would die out but it seems to be seeing a resurgence. What we should be doing is help them get through their own "reformation" if that is even possible. Granted, Reformation really didn't eliminate religion being problematic (just look at Protestant vs Catholic conflicts in the past) but it's a start. Weaken the hold of the clergy over the smallfolk.

Reformation would also allow a flourishing of new sects. Considering that most people are moderate anyway, they'd probably go along with moderate sects and there might be more moderate sects to begin with.

When religion have to compete in the free market of faith, they adapt to the people rather than force the people to submit to their will.

My reasoning is very simple. I don't want to live near Muslims. Not all of them may be terrorists or terrorist supporters, but the vast majority of the terrorists are Muslims. My logic is that, prevention is better than cure. Why take the risk?

BTW... I don't want to kill any of them, as long as they don't attack me.

I also don't want to live near them. Not that I believe they are all bad but their level of tribal mentality is disturbing. You're always worrying you might offend someone. And it's not like I would be able to live near them in the first place. They tend to form ghettos which in time become a no-go for infidels.

You forget that it is hard to enslave a person. In the soul of everyone will fury rage and when it flashes. And some resist all their lives. Therefore, we should not even talk about destroying Muslims or Islam. This desire can be the whole world.

[mindrust]

You all should have done what Japanese did. Japs don't give a fuck if you are a Muslim or not. Anything unrelated to Japanese culture is not welcome in Japan. They don't let people pray in the streets, they don't let people with hardcore black cloth covers walk around. Nothing. If you act aggressive and shout "*llah *ckbar" you 'll get arrested and deported.

If you are going to accept foreign people in your country and gonna give them your passports, at least give them a proper education. If they don't agree with that, kick them out. That's the way it should have been.

Assimilation, fellas. Only way to accept foreigners.

If they carry their crap with them into your country why the fuck you have to accept this shit? Iran don't let that happen. Saudi's not. Why you have to?

[BADecker]

Don't kill Muslims. Kill Islam.

Islam is a governmental religion that the vast majority of Muslims do not follow even close to correctly. Islam is a religion of violence. But most Muslims and Muslim clerics have already almost destroyed it by turning it into a religion of peace.

Help Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way by freeing them from the violent requirements of their religion.

Don't kill the Muslims. Rather, help the Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way.

I doubt the religion can be killed. Many said Christianity would die out but it seems to be seeing a resurgence. What we should be doing is help them get through their own "reformation" if that is even possible. Granted, Reformation really didn't eliminate religion being problematic (just look at Protestant vs Catholic conflicts in the past) but it's a start. Weaken the hold of the clergy over the smallfolk.

Reformation would also allow a flourishing of new sects. Considering that most people are moderate anyway, they'd probably go along with moderate sects and there might be more moderate sects to begin with.

When religion have to compete in the free market of faith, they adapt to the people rather than force the people to submit to their will.

My reasoning is very simple. I don't want to live near Muslims. Not all of them may be terrorists or terrorist supporters, but the vast majority of the terrorists are Muslims. My logic is that, prevention is better than cure. Why take the risk?

BTW... I don't want to kill any of them, as long as they don't attack me.

I also don't want to live near them. Not that I believe they are all bad but their level of tribal mentality is disturbing. You're always worrying you might offend someone. And it's not like I would be able to live near them in the first place. They tend to form ghettos which in time become a no-go for infidels.

You forget that it is hard to enslave a person. In the soul of everyone will fury rage and when it flashes. And some resist all their lives. Therefore, we should not even talk about destroying Muslims or Islam. This desire can be the whole world.

Yes, but in Western Sahara, especially the part that is NOT part of Morocco, they get away with slavery. And the slaves have been in slavery so long that they don't even understand the concept of freedom.

Wouldn't it be better to make Muslims our slaves for such a long time that the idea of freedom is a concept that has been bred out of them? That is the thing that they are doing to others in Western Sahara.

[Mometaskers]

Don't kill Muslims. Kill Islam.

Islam is a governmental religion that the vast majority of Muslims do not follow even close to correctly. Islam is a religion of violence. But most Muslims and Muslim clerics have already almost destroyed it by turning it into a religion of peace.

Help Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way by freeing them from the violent requirements of their religion.

Don't kill the Muslims. Rather, help the Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way.

I doubt the religion can be killed. Many said Christianity would die out but it seems to be seeing a resurgence. What we should be doing is help them get through their own "reformation" if that is even possible. Granted, Reformation really didn't eliminate religion being problematic (just look at Protestant vs Catholic conflicts in the past) but it's a start. Weaken the hold of the clergy over the smallfolk.

Reformation would also allow a flourishing of new sects. Considering that most people are moderate anyway, they'd probably go along with moderate sects and there might be more moderate sects to begin with.

When religion have to compete in the free market of faith, they adapt to the people rather than force the people to submit to their will.

My reasoning is very simple. I don't want to live near Muslims. Not all of them may be terrorists or terrorist supporters, but the vast majority of the terrorists are Muslims. My logic is that, prevention is better than cure. Why take the risk?

BTW... I don't want to kill any of them, as long as they don't attack me.

I also don't want to live near them. Not that I believe they are all bad but their level of tribal mentality is disturbing. You're always worrying you might offend someone. And it's not like I would be able to live near them in the first place. They tend to form ghettos which in time become a no-go for infidels.

You forget that it is hard to enslave a person. In the soul of everyone will fury rage and when it flashes. And some resist all their lives. Therefore, we should not even talk about destroying Muslims or Islam. This desire can be the whole world.

I'm talking about helping the moderates steer their religion towards modernity. Remember when Christians used to burn heretics at the stake? From a religion that claim to be peaceful, nobody expected the Spanish Inquisition...

Do Christians still do that? Do they still stone gays? Do they still punish women who bore children out of wedlock? No. Even prior to the Great Schism that split Catholics and Orthodox, they've already did away with many of the brutal punishments endorsed in the Old Testament.

Granted, such turnaround would be harder for Islam. After all, all the murderous parts of the Koran are at end when Big M has already amassed an army and no longer need to court Jews and Christians to join his new religious group. Considering that newer revelations are considered better but do not overwrite older ones, it can claim being a religion of peace while still advocating for the subjugation of kuffars.

Still, don't underestimate human will. The moderates just need to be more vocal at their opposition of the radicals. (Despite them being accused by some of still agreeing with radicals despite not partaking in their violence.)