What Donald Trump Can Do With North Korea - Melania Is In New York Now

[GreenBits]

If you ask me, I'd say leave them alone until he makes some stupid move like launching missiles or some external dodgy business. Then you go in, take him down and after he's down, I don't think that people would be that much in grief, since we know what situation is in there and i you look at it, liberated NK can be a great source of cheap work labor since they're used to working like that and the whole NK could become flooded with big companies looking for cheap labor so it would become far more industrialised and also there are a lot of people from NK and SK that are separated by that war.

Unfortunately I don't see much intelligence nor no Trump Ivanka. It is foolish to wait when they do something bad. You need to be proactive. Do you agree?

I have to agree. We didn't do anything military under Obama and the situation escalated to its current point; I'm not saying there weren't reasons, but ultimately, sanctions failed. Now that it has developed to a point that they are actually a serious threat, it would be wise to cut the head off of the snake, so to speak. To be passive additionally would only bolster the resolve to complete their program. And no one wants NK with a true ICBM.

[iluvbitcoins]

If you ask me, I'd say leave them alone until he makes some stupid move like launching missiles or some external dodgy business. Then you go in, take him down and after he's down, I don't think that people would be that much in grief, since we know what situation is in there and i you look at it, liberated NK can be a great source of cheap work labor since they're used to working like that and the whole NK could become flooded with big companies looking for cheap labor so it would become far more industrialised and also there are a lot of people from NK and SK that are separated by that war.

The only external force that would ever probably invade NK righteously would be South Korea.
But it's never going to happen because the people of North Korea are so indoctrinated they would fight till the death for their oppressor, they would only logically see their liberators as attackers and invaders.

[Snail2]

I have to agree. We didn't do anything military under Obama and the situation escalated to its current point; I'm not saying there weren't reasons, but ultimately, sanctions failed. Now that it has developed to a point that they are actually a serious threat, it would be wise to cut the head off of the snake, so to speak. To be passive additionally would only bolster the resolve to complete their program. And no one wants NK with a true ICBM.

You americans seem to be slow learners . Every time you guys acted "pre-emptively" the situation always turned from bad to seriously fucked up.

[Roger Burton]

I don't think that Americans can win a war with North Korea. North Korea is much stronger than Americans.  Trump was made some serious mistakes and I hope for his own good, doesn't do more.

[Sithara007]

I don't think that Americans can win a war with North Korea. North Korea is much stronger than Americans.  Trump was made some serious mistakes and I hope for his own good, doesn't do more.

The DPRK is a nuclear nation, and according to the experts they have somewhere around 40 to 50 nuclear warheads in their possession. Even if they can launch just one of them successfully, it can cause the deaths of millions of people.

[stompix]

I don't think that Americans can win a war with North Korea. North Korea is much stronger than Americans.  Trump was made some serious mistakes and I hope for his own good, doesn't do more.

This is hilarious!!!!
Of course North Korea is stronger than the US , but the most powerful in the world is the probably the Senegalese army

Now, if anyone thinks it can anticipate what trump will do next, start trading because you sure have a damn accurate crystal ball.

nato is done for, nato is useful , china is /not a currency manipulator, i will jail Hillary....not.
Honestly I won't be amazed if in 3 years he ends up marrying her.

God knows what will happen if he finds a few memes about North Korea on the net and Ivanka tells him they are disgusting.

[Tyrantt]

If you ask me, I'd say leave them alone until he makes some stupid move like launching missiles or some external dodgy business. Then you go in, take him down and after he's down, I don't think that people would be that much in grief, since we know what situation is in there and i you look at it, liberated NK can be a great source of cheap work labor since they're used to working like that and the whole NK could become flooded with big companies looking for cheap labor so it would become far more industrialised and also there are a lot of people from NK and SK that are separated by that war.

Unfortunately I don't see much intelligence nor no Trump Ivanka. It is foolish to wait when they do something bad. You need to be proactive. Do you agree?

Well to be honest, they couldn't have got where they are if they were complete degenerates. But this sudden bombings and deployed aircraft carriers weren't something that he needed because that's why some of the people voted for him and now he's slowly turning out to be just like Hillary to some degree. You mean about NK? Well they've been doing that stuff for quite some time now but they're getting cocky with the missile testing and threats too.

[ekoice]

As you can understand Donald have more time for his president job, because Melania live currently in New York ( less family life means more time for work ), so he can also start to think some more strong reaction on North Korea nuclear weapons & missile programme ( see more info here - http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-17399847. What can happen if he will do something against North Korea ? Do not forget US obligations and US army presence in South Korea.

He is sending a carrier task group to the area. Maybe a false flag is in order and a reason to go in and kill that dicktator once and for all. China maybe against it but who knows what kind of deal he struck with Xi Jinping. Maybe they agreed to divide up the north between themselves. No one is going to care what happens to the Kim family.

All these years, you have learned nothing. How many countries did get better after US chopped off head of its state leader?

And I guess, you are going to feed 20 million+ Koreans personally after all is done, huh? Know what, those people were brought up to see Kim family the same way you see Statue of Liberty and Constitution. You would not stop believing in freedom if some walking by Samaritan firebombed your home, would you? Youd look for a way to hurt him and his family back (which is precisely what Arabs have been doing since west backed Spring, if I remember).

It is almost hilarious, that so many smart people have problems relating to others.

Anyway, Kim family has to be ousted INTERNALLY by Koreans themselves. Only then through power vacuum and infighting in military junta can country open itself out to the outside - if the resulting unrest is what you wish for.

Personally, I am far more concerned about continent of Africa with its population DOUBLING every three decades. North Koreans if nothing else can actually feed themselves without foreign intervention. I see Trump actions the same way, I saw them in Syria - he wants to show strength and reassure regional allies, which is quite prudent. Not start another war, that will become huge humanitarian and moral problem in the future.

Just like Iraq,Afghanistan have lost their stability and peace after US invasion,same would happen in North Korea.But this time, the game is quiet different.Iraq and Afghanistan had no nuclear weapons and were easily targeted by US.But not North Korea,it has nuclear weapons.

[Lieldoryn]

China invited the Koreans to renounce nuclear weapons and to guarantee their safety. After the same security guarantee for Ukraine in 1994, Russia, UK and USA we know how that ended. What do you think will respond to North Korea?

[Oppolee]

China invited the Koreans to renounce nuclear weapons and to guarantee their safety. After the same security guarantee for Ukraine in 1994, Russia, UK and USA we know how that ended. What do you think will respond to North Korea?

I am sure that the government of North Korea will not listen to anyone. People already already consider their ruler a deity. Perhaps it is from this country that the third world war will begin.

[criptix]

Russian bots are pissing their pants because if trump goes hard on NK then logically next are nations that are under control of russia

And nevertheless what RT says, russia will lose badly.

[Lancusters]

Russian bots are pissing their pants because if trump goes hard on NK then logically next are nations that are under control of russia

And nevertheless what RT says, russia will lose badly.

Whatever it was, but it seems to me that the threat posed by North Korea is much less of the threat emanating from Russia. And I don't see any steps from the Trump to this threat to prevent.

[gabmen]

China invited the Koreans to renounce nuclear weapons and to guarantee their safety. After the same security guarantee for Ukraine in 1994, Russia, UK and USA we know how that ended. What do you think will respond to North Korea?

I am sure that the government of North Korea will not listen to anyone. People already already consider their ruler a deity. Perhaps it is from this country that the third world war will begin.

Well I think kim is just one small wrong move away from getting his ass kicked. And if us attacks, nokor would most likely be on it's own as it's known allies like china would have second thoughts on helping out as kim hasn't been listening to anyone concerning his nuke tests even to china. And to think that this happened after trump met with xi jinping.

[Sithara007]

China invited the Koreans to renounce nuclear weapons and to guarantee their safety. After the same security guarantee for Ukraine in 1994, Russia, UK and USA we know how that ended. What do you think will respond to North Korea?

This will be dangerous. In such a deal, China is going to guarantee the safety of North Korea. In case of any unilateral missile attacks from the US warships, China will be forced to respond, by targeting the American bases in South Korea and Japan.

[stompix]

Russian bots are pissing their pants because if trump goes hard on NK then logically next are nations that are under control of russia

And nevertheless what RT says, russia will lose badly.

Whatever it was, but it seems to me that the threat posed by North Korea is much less of the threat emanating from Russia. And I don't see any steps from the Trump to this threat to prevent.

Russia can be brought down economically. Happened twice in the last 30 years, once with the URSS and once with Russia in 1998.

With North Korea, you can't do this. They don't have a f** economy in the first place.
It's like trying to starve monkeys by putting an embargo on bananas.

[Alexzap]

China invited the Koreans to renounce nuclear weapons and to guarantee their safety. After the same security guarantee for Ukraine in 1994, Russia, UK and USA we know how that ended. What do you think will respond to North Korea?

This will be dangerous. In such a deal, China is going to guarantee the safety of North Korea. In case of any unilateral missile attacks from the US warships, China will be forced to respond, by targeting the American bases in South Korea and Japan.

It seems to me that the hours of ultimatum to Kim Jong-UN is already running. China does not want the neighborhood to such an inadequate regime. The Chinese have the opportunity to eliminate the threat by proxy. Perhaps the war is already inevitable.

[Lacander]

Trump has driven himself into a trap and risks starting a nuclear war with North Korea. He played in the role of president and a serious war could begin in which China will help to defeat North Korea.

[Sithara007]

Russian bots are pissing their pants because if trump goes hard on NK then logically next are nations that are under control of russia

And nevertheless what RT says, russia will lose badly.

Whatever it was, but it seems to me that the threat posed by North Korea is much less of the threat emanating from Russia. And I don't see any steps from the Trump to this threat to prevent.

Russia can be brought down economically. Happened twice in the last 30 years, once with the URSS and once with Russia in 1998.

With North Korea, you can't do this. They don't have a f** economy in the first place.
It's like trying to starve monkeys by putting an embargo on bananas.

You are mistaken about Russia. The ongoing sanctions are having hardly any impact. It is true that the Russian economy has been hit hard by the low crude oil prices, but the economic growth has resumed after many months of contraction.

[bitmakerBR]

Russian bots are pissing their pants because if trump goes hard on NK then logically next are nations that are under control of russia

And nevertheless what RT says, russia will lose badly.

Whatever it was, but it seems to me that the threat posed by North Korea is much less of the threat emanating from Russia. And I don't see any steps from the Trump to this threat to prevent.

Russia can be brought down economically. Happened twice in the last 30 years, once with the URSS and once with Russia in 1998.

With North Korea, you can't do this. They don't have a f** economy in the first place.
It's like trying to starve monkeys by putting an embargo on bananas.

You are mistaken about Russia. The ongoing sanctions are having hardly any impact. It is true that the Russian economy has been hit hard by the low crude oil prices, but the economic growth has resumed after many months of contraction.

What about social affairs? Why raise taxes and energy prices and why cut pensions and salaries? Horse, but Russia is a big country and it's easier to cope with difficulties

[criptix]

Russian bots are pissing their pants because if trump goes hard on NK then logically next are nations that are under control of russia

And nevertheless what RT says, russia will lose badly.

Whatever it was, but it seems to me that the threat posed by North Korea is much less of the threat emanating from Russia. And I don't see any steps from the Trump to this threat to prevent.

Russia can be brought down economically. Happened twice in the last 30 years, once with the URSS and once with Russia in 1998.

With North Korea, you can't do this. They don't have a f** economy in the first place.
It's like trying to starve monkeys by putting an embargo on bananas.

You are mistaken about Russia. The ongoing sanctions are having hardly any impact. It is true that the Russian economy has been hit hard by the low crude oil prices, but the economic growth has resumed after many months of contraction.

What about social affairs? Why raise taxes and energy prices and why cut pensions and salaries? Horse, but Russia is a big country and it's easier to cope with difficulties

The economy had 3 years of deep recession. Nearly all of their emergency funds are depleted. The only thing that really gives them profit right now is the defense sector.
They have increasing profits from arms trading several years in a row now.

Syria is not only in russias sphere of influence - but one of the biggest arms show since afghanistan and iraq.
And putin knows how to use it as PR for russias defense sector.