Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2018, 05:39:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Greg Maxwell doesn't support BIP 148 UASF  (Read 1671 times)
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
April 14, 2017, 02:57:54 PM
 #1

Stop hoping for segwit via UASF.  It ain't gonna happen for sure.

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/014152.html


1542562787
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542562787

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542562787
Reply with quote  #2

1542562787
Report to moderator
1542562787
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542562787

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542562787
Reply with quote  #2

1542562787
Report to moderator
1542562787
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542562787

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542562787
Reply with quote  #2

1542562787
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1542562787
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542562787

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542562787
Reply with quote  #2

1542562787
Report to moderator
1542562787
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542562787

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542562787
Reply with quote  #2

1542562787
Report to moderator
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 1241



View Profile
April 14, 2017, 03:35:30 PM
 #2

lets wait for lauda and the blockstreams suddenly back track and start saying bad things about USAF now their overlord has said it bad

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
April 14, 2017, 03:37:51 PM
 #3

lets wait for lauda and the blockstreams suddenly back track and start saying bad things about USAF now their overlord has said it bad

Funny thing, Greg makes this post to the mailing list this morning after I challenged him for his doublespeak about it last night, here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1823783.msg18580510#msg18580510


manselr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000

ICO appreciator


View Profile
April 14, 2017, 04:01:55 PM
 #4

lets wait for lauda and the blockstreams suddenly back track and start saying bad things about USAF now their overlord has said it bad

Read again Roger. Gmaxwell says BIP148 doesn't meet the required standards, he doesn't say UASF as a whole is a ruled out idea. A more refined BIP would pass.

At the end of the day segwit will get enabled one way or another and we all know this.
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
April 14, 2017, 04:35:02 PM
 #5


At the end of the day segwit will get enabled one way or another and we all know this.

sure... just not necessarily on Bitcoin.


Batelk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 14, 2017, 06:02:08 PM
 #6

lets wait for lauda and the blockstreams suddenly back track and start saying bad things about USAF now their overlord has said it bad

Read again Roger. Gmaxwell says BIP148 doesn't meet the required standards, he doesn't say UASF as a whole is a ruled out idea. A more refined BIP would pass.

At the end of the day segwit will get enabled one way or another and we all know this.

The intention of the HK meeting was to enable the SegWit together with the 2MB block.

ZenCash Conducting Private Transactions Worldwide Completely
Discord -------- ANN Thread -------- Blog -------- Telegram  --------  Forum -------- Twitter
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
d5000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1244



View Profile
April 14, 2017, 06:14:11 PM
 #7

Greg is right here, I think. In my opinion it's better to start with his proposed Asicboost-blocking UASF - that would be a minor change but would allow us to see the real incidence of this "optimization" (or "attack") and would nearly sure be supported by a majority of miners. Then we could move forward with Segwit UASF, somewhere near end-2017 to mid-2018.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!