Hey idiots & low iqs; This is a nuclear bomb...

[Masha Sha]

So i have no idea how big is a 50kt explosion. But this bomb is very small in size... can you understand the trend?

And this lead me to say that all those that support people like putin & co, those faking power weak dying men (all will die), are a problem to me and the earth.

Yes those type of munitions are necessary against "Power"men, however why isn't a better world worked on?

Spin your bullshit to defend them as you want mad(&dying)servants of those men... and the worst is that by defending them you will pay her dinner... she would eat the bones of her children if there was daimond in it...

Western civilization is a humanist vision in which Roman law integrated Jesus wisdom, thereby giving Western culture its distinctive character: freedom of speech and of the press, equal justice under law, the primacy of the individual, separation of religion and state, freedom of religion and from religion, property rights, sexual equality, an independent judiciary, and independent education, among other values, like clean natural nutrishious food, pure water, clean air, and formost respect and love for the biospheres.

Sadly, there are still a lot of barbarians around, one disctinctive feature is: personnality cult for men and women (the concept of honor, dignity, liberty or duty are relegated to their servitude to their leader (alive or dead). Another word for barbarians in subhumans, sadly they even with all their weakness still learn how to make and use weapons.

And this is why or they become human (they all can) or must be killed fisrt.

[darkseid1199]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

[Barrymore]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

[gabmen]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

Either way, the world and the innocent people in it would take most of the effect these nukes are going to bring out. It's going to be a continuous process if we think that violence would resolve anything. Just look at what's happening in the middle east. The people that are most affected with the offensive against these terrorists are the people that should have been protected. We're doing more damage to them than the terrorists are

[Spendulus]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

Either way, the world and the innocent people in it would take most of the effect these nukes are going to bring out. It's going to be a continuous process if we think that violence would resolve anything. Just look at what's happening in the middle east. The people that are most affected with the offensive against these terrorists are the people that should have been protected. We're doing more damage to them than the terrorists are

The illustration clearly shows the dial-in-power of the B61 being used to hit a military target next to a city with the city being unaffected. Just clarifying. I'm not in favor of these weapons or of war.

[Slow death]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

Either way, the world and the innocent people in it would take most of the effect these nukes are going to bring out. It's going to be a continuous process if we think that violence would resolve anything. Just look at what's happening in the middle east. The people that are most affected with the offensive against these terrorists are the people that should have been protected. We're doing more damage to them than the terrorists are

The illustration clearly shows the dial-in-power of the B61 being used to hit a military target next to a city with the city being unaffected.

I was frightened thinking that some city was destroyed with nuclear bomb, in the end it is a training and nobody was injured.


" Hey idiots & low iqs; This is a nuclear bomb..."

Do not keep scaring us

[tvbcof]

The illustration clearly shows the dial-in-power of the B61 being used to hit a military target next to a city with the city being unaffected. Just clarifying. I'm not in favor of these weapons or of war.

The media and sock puppet armies of the United States of Zionism have been trying to justify in the minds of the sheeple the use tactical nukes for a while now.  They are 'Clean and Green'!  Just have to set the dial correctly and that's all there is to it.  American made nukes are humane and wonderful while Russian and Iranian nukes are bad bad WMD's.

Frankly, nukes of any type obsolete.  Biological and psychological weapons are where it's at as far as legacy un-enhanced humans are concerned.  I'm glad to be a relative mongrel genetically and ideologically speaking.  Could be and advantage or a dis-advantage depending on how things play out.

[grermezter]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

I don't think he is contradicting himself he is just saying that it's  ironic and maybe hypocritical for people to use weapons that kill and causes mass destruction as a means to bring peace whiles dialogue and reasoning is the best option

[olushakes]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

Its really ironic and annoying that in the guise of protecting ourselves we turned into monsters that create weapons of massive destruction within minutes as you have rightly stated there but we forgot that even our lives is even worthwhile and interesting with the existence of our perceived enemies. The question that bothers me, is to what end exactly? Citizens across the world are still complaining of lack  but the leaders deem it fit to invest the resources in creating weapons.

[Sakura_nakomoto]

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

That is the type of thinking that lead to WW2 and every other war.

You are a little mistaken. Because the Second World War has already taken place. The third world war is on the turn. But it will still happen.

[BurtW]

There is a lot about the actual bomb here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B61_nuclear_bomb

This is also very interesting and terrifying:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons

[BurtW]

So i have no idea how big is a 50kt explosion.

For comparison:

Mark 1 – "Little Boy" gun-type uranium weapon (used against Hiroshima). (13–18 kilotons, 1945–1950)
Mark 3 – "Fat Man" plutonium implosion weapon (used against Nagasaki), effectively the same at the "Gadget" device used in the Trinity (nuclear test) with minor design differences. (21 kilotons, 1945–1950)

So more than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.

But it can be "dialed back" to only 5 or 10 kilotons.

[digaran]

MOAB dropped on ISIS was 10 tones and a nuclear warhead with destructive power of 50KT means a 50,000 tones MOAB.
Lets kill all 1B+ Chinese and North Koreans Russians, Iranians and all the Arabs and in general all the third world countries then what?
Assuming you lived 90 years happily ever after but then what? total blackness and nothing else right? if so then kill yourself so you don't have to tolerate such a world.

[JengoFF_n0]

MOAB dropped on ISIS was 10 tones and a nuclear warhead with destructive power of 50KT means a 50,000 tones MOAB.
Lets kill all 1B+ Chinese and North Koreans Russians, Iranians and all the Arabs and in general all the third world countries then what?
Assuming you lived 90 years happily ever after but then what? total blackness and nothing else right? if so then kill yourself so you don't have to tolerate such a world.

I think that you understand that if it had not been for the world community, it has long since been dropped on the idyl all that can be discarded. But everyone wants to kill humanely.

[Mometaskers]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

It's a MAD world. We can't even call this mutually-assured destruction anymore... Even non-belligerents will suffer.

[Masha Sha]

Time to try to understand... thanks for both of your comments.

MOAB dropped on ISIS was 10 tones and a nuclear warhead with destructive power of 50KT means a 50,000 tones MOAB.
Lets kill all 1B+ Chinese and North Koreans Russians, Iranians and all the Arabs and in general all the third world countries then what?
Assuming you lived 90 years happily ever after but then what? total blackness and nothing else right? if so then kill yourself so you don't have to tolerate such a world.

So i have no idea how big is a 50kt explosion.

For comparison:

Mark 1 – "Little Boy" gun-type uranium weapon (used against Hiroshima). (13–18 kilotons, 1945–1950)
Mark 3 – "Fat Man" plutonium implosion weapon (used against Nagasaki), effectively the same at the "Gadget" device used in the Trinity (nuclear test) with minor design differences. (21 kilotons, 1945–1950)

So more than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.

But it can be "dialed back" to only 5 or 10 kilotons.

So:

The kilojoule (kJ) is equal to one thousand (10^3) joules. One square metre of the Earth receives about 1.4 kilojoules of solar radiation every second in full daylight.

The gigajoule (GJ) is equal to one billion (10^9) joules. 6 GJ is about the amount of potential chemical energy in 160 L (approximately one US standard barrel) of oil, when combusted.

The terajoule (TJ) is equal to one trillion (10^12) joules; about 0.278 GWh (often used in energy tables). About 63 TJ of energy was released by the atomic bomb that exploded over Hiroshima.

The petajoule (PJ) is equal to one quadrillion (10^15) joules. 210 PJ is equivalent to about 50 megatons of TNT. This is the amount of energy released by the Tsar Bomba, the largest man-made nuclear explosion ever.

The zettajoule (ZJ) is equal to one sextillion (1021) joules. The human annual global energy consumption is approximately 0.5 ZJ.

The yottajoule (YJ) is equal to one septillion (10^24) joules. This is approximately the amount of energy required to heat all the water on Earth by 1 °C. The thermal output of the Sun is approximately 400 YJ per second.




And finally MOAB Blast yield 11 tons TNT (46 GJ), and B61 nuclear bomb 300-340000 tons TNT?

It's not easy appreciate the difference in the scale... how could a barrel of oil hold 6 GJ and a moab only produce 46 GJ blast yield? Why yield, seems more appropriate for farmland.

Anyway my all point was small in size but not in power, but I am still discovering how impactfull it can be... i though that the little box in the first pictures were boxes... not a city.

[HabBear]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

Yes, incredibly ironic. The wars are are all the same - one side doesn't agree with another's view point, so they try to force them into submission with weapons. The other side (or a third side) identifies the first side's audacity to oppress a people so they bomb the shit of them to force them into submission.

The only way this shit stops is when everyone puts the guns down.

[tvbcof]

... how could a barrel of oil hold 6 GJ and a moab only produce 46 GJ blast yield? Why yield, seems more appropriate for farmland.  ...

Ya, common misconception about the power of explosives.  They tend to release even less energy than a good fuel.  They just release it faster making a high enough peek energy density to mechanically fracture a target material.

If one computes the area under the curve of a the energy release from:
 - a pound of C4 detonated
 - a pound of C4 lit on fire to heat an MRE (Meal Ready to Eat)
it will be similar.  It's just that the peak value for the detonated curve will be much higher.

We use a slower explosive like ammonium nitrate for cratering charges which tends more to heave rather than shatter material.

Looked at another way, I could move a lot more dirt with 40 pounds of diesel fuel and a bulldozer than I could with a 40 lb cratering charge.

[Lancusters]

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

Yes, incredibly ironic. The wars are are all the same - one side doesn't agree with another's view point, so they try to force them into submission with weapons. The other side (or a third side) identifies the first side's audacity to oppress a people so they bomb the shit of them to force them into submission.

The only way this shit stops is when everyone puts the guns down.

It is not possible. Who will agree to put your weapons on the ground? I don't believe it. Nuclear weapons of North Korea can only scare neighboring States, but the faster will be destroyed the regime of Kim the less will be the victims.

[popcorn1]

The people vote and the elections must be checked in case of fraud I.E Turkey  and then the winner of that party does what the people voted for..
YOU WORK FOR THE PEOPLE..If the people want new schools YOU DO IT  that's why we voted for you..
You don't get in and then rob our taxes and contracts to line your own pockets ..YOU SHOULD BE IN JAIL..

You are not a leader like kings and queens of yesteryear ..IT'S OVER THOSE DAYS ARE GONE..
Why because it protects the future children ..

The people need to rule this planet .OR we will never move forward ..

Even down to birth control..If we all one day unite we can all say planet lets all stop having children for 2 years to lower the population
and every country can stop for 2 years and some old will die off leaving less people on this planet and every so often we can do this..

Saves going to war and destroying this planet and humanity..

We all get a universal income no one person rules THE WHOLE EARTH PEOPLE DO..

My thinking is if Russia makes something good then we all benefit if china does something good we all benefit..

Travel into space plenty of tech needed that the whole planet needs to be involved with..

It reminds me of drug dealers fighting over turf ..OIL GANGSTERS MINING GANGSTERS ..All fighting to sell to the masses.
also fighting for the mines..GREEDY RATS..

When a universal income could solve it all ..

Robert B. Reich: Technological Change and the Inevitability of ...
Video for universal income i everything▶ 30:11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFhismScVq4
7 May 2016 - Uploaded by NEOPOLIS.network
Robert B. Reich: Technological Change and the Inevitability of Unconditional Basic Income.

Robert Reich: The Truth About Taxes [CC] - YouTube
Video for Robert B. Reich universal income▶ 2:31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLbsuVKY44E

Introducing the universal basic income | IN 60 SECONDS - YouTube
Video for Robert B. Reich universal income▶ 1:18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2i2yvQ8gCSI
6 Jun 2016 - Uploaded by American Enterprise Institute

Or as the planet become?    if you can talk good you become elected and then can rob the people of taxes.

Seems so..

We the people buy these peoples stuff lets stop buying it THEY ARE FINISHED THEN .
No paying your way or bad business practice THEN WE SHOULD NOT BUY..

So someone make a website about BAD COMPANIES ..And make sure IT'S THE TRUTH .or you will be sued..

But if i looked and a company was ripping us off i wouldn't use ..
Or a company killing us by what they do..JUST DON'T BUY..
Come on as a people we can do this..

WE GIVE COMPANIES THE RIGHT TO SELL TO THE MASSES..So be thankful you made a good living as it is..GREEDY PEOPLE..
So lets name them and shame them and never buy again..

Or the might be one already a site who names and shames companies..
WE HAVE THE POWER ..Without the masses buying they loose they are gone over..
Don't worry someone will come along and will do the right thing by the people to make good money..
They will just make what you made .And you greedy man is finished..

SO LETS STOP BUYING ..From BIG ELITE COMPANIES..
This is how we win..

I HATE GREEDY PEOPLE HATE THEM..Have so much and still want more..And not a care in the world who they hurt..