a new strategy for dice (all or nothing or double or nothing!)

[Red-Apple]

The strategy is too aggressive in my opinion

i agree, and that is what makes it interesting

Going double or nothing is perhaps a good way to lose fast but hitting enough wins in a row so you can withdraw from a single faucet claim is just too unlikely.

it is a lose fast win fast kind of strategy in my opinion. to make it better, i believe it is best to come up with a number of rolls for example 10 to 15 and you never go above that number. and stop after it.

I remember once I tried to gamble on multiple gambling sites at a time. Opened 4 or 5 dice gambling sites then I went for betting all the faucet amounts to do or die kind of attempts. If I keep on winning I will be sticking with one site otherwise I will switch over to next one and will do bet with all faucet amount and keep repeating the steps and finally come back to the first site and claim faucet and then continued.

This is a good way to kill our time and nothing else. When we are sure about we will lose everything at the end, I believe no gambler will be finding fun with it like what I have concluded.

i liked the name, so i am going to call it "roll or die".
but i don't like the opening of multiple sites. it is going to take all my time then. i am doing other things while i make bets for example i am reading bitcointalk and making some posts then i go make a bet then i go check my orders in the exchange to make some trades and ....

to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun

this is correct, reverse martingale is different.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_%28betting_system%29#Anti-martingale

[wxa7115]

to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun

To what I know reverse martingale is the opposite version of martingale itself. With martingale, we increase our bet size after a loss while with the reverse version we increase our bet size after a win. In reverse martingale, we have to reset our bet size to it initial value after we hit couple of greens. Both martingale and reverse martingale have their own risk.

I did not know that was called reverse martingale, that seems like is less risky in the long term if after a few wins you go back to your original bet and the only reason that seems less risky is because you are not going to lose your entire bankroll in a single roll of a dice.

[chris200x9]

to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun

To what I know reverse martingale is the opposite version of martingale itself. With martingale, we increase our bet size after a loss while with the reverse version we increase our bet size after a win. In reverse martingale, we have to reset our bet size to it initial value after we hit couple of greens. Both martingale and reverse martingale have their own risk.

I did not know that was called reverse martingale, that seems like is less risky in the long term if after a few wins you go back to your original bet and the only reason that seems less risky is because you are not going to lose your entire bankroll in a single roll of a dice.

If we get more greens in a row, then it is profitable, but it is not possible in a dice game. After hitting 4 or 5 greens, we again get one red colour. So this is never ending the story. You will make a profit and the same way you will lose all winnings in a single bet. I think this strategy will not work. Martingale method is ok, but reverse martingale is not worth.

[JL421]

Ya right win or die. I did try this with my profit i was like let's try with 0.1 btc. I went all in and what happened i lost. This is obviously best with faucet only and some sites offer 10 times claim per day. But i don't think i have the same luck with dice sites now which i had few months ago.

[bering]

i have done more crazy strategy than yours and i started with faucet but setting my betting to 9900x payout and after more than 100 times i decide to stop it because it makes me tired indeed it is almost impossible to won the bets with those setting bets but i'm just curious wanna try it because just like you says it's only for fun

[molsewid]

I'd done this kind of strategy i don't want to stock on one i always do random crazy strategy that i think it could help me do win about 1 bitcoin but this is just a dream only where i know i can't even win 0.1 bitcoin i am afraid to lose when im already win i always decided to withdrew my profit.

[ufaiz50]

This way too fast "All in" but is suitable for those who gamble for fun because they tend to be less concerned with their bankroll and prefers enjoying the game. I don't really like this strategy, it's tense if you lose definitely want to die.

[BossMacko]

I've used this method in the past when i was tripping claiming faucet in every dice casino that i know, The technique here is set a winning limitation so that when you reach consecutive greens and have reach the desired amount then you can stop playing all in to prevent losing everything. Try also changing the chance to 49% to 77% just experiment anyway it is only faucet that we are using here. Cheers

[torry28]

to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun

To what I know reverse martingale is the opposite version of martingale itself. With martingale, we increase our bet size after a loss while with the reverse version we increase our bet size after a win. In reverse martingale, we have to reset our bet size to it initial value after we hit couple of greens. Both martingale and reverse martingale have their own risk.

I did not know that was called reverse martingale, that seems like is less risky in the long term if after a few wins you go back to your original bet and the only reason that seems less risky is because you are not going to lose your entire bankroll in a single roll of a dice.

If we get more greens in a row, then it is profitable, but it is not possible in a dice game. After hitting 4 or 5 greens, we again get one red colour. So this is never ending the story. You will make a profit and the same way you will lose all winnings in a single bet. I think this strategy will not work. Martingale method is ok, but reverse martingale is not worth.

It's possible in any kind of gambling games. A reverse martingale is worth if you are stop on right time (Stop when you already get some green streaks in a row) then you can lower your bet or back to base bet again. I would prefer this reverse rather than martingale because we know martingale is really scary strategy.

[roadbits]

to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun

To what I know reverse martingale is the opposite version of martingale itself. With martingale, we increase our bet size after a loss while with the reverse version we increase our bet size after a win. In reverse martingale, we have to reset our bet size to it initial value after we hit couple of greens. Both martingale and reverse martingale have their own risk.

I did not know that was called reverse martingale, that seems like is less risky in the long term if after a few wins you go back to your original bet and the only reason that seems less risky is because you are not going to lose your entire bankroll in a single roll of a dice.

If we get more greens in a row, then it is profitable, but it is not possible in a dice game. After hitting 4 or 5 greens, we again get one red colour. So this is never ending the story. You will make a profit and the same way you will lose all winnings in a single bet. I think this strategy will not work. Martingale method is ok, but reverse martingale is not worth.

It's possible in any kind of gambling games. A reverse martingale is worth if you are stop on right time (Stop when you already get some green streaks in a row) then you can lower your bet or back to base bet again. I would prefer this reverse rather than martingale because we know martingale is really scary strategy.

Yes if we know when to stop our play then this reverse martingale method will work, but we always miss right time to stop our play, our greediness will not allow us to stop the game at the right time. So if you are using this martingale or reverse martingale method first, you should control yourself then try this method.

[coynedterm]

Win or Die strategy!

disclaimers before everyone kills me here:
1. this is not a new strategy, i know. it is a new strategy that "I" am using today.
2. it is not supposed to be good, 100% win,... it is supposed to be fun and exhilarating
3. i am sharing it here for fun purposes because i believe gambling should all be about fun and nothing else.
4. i am using faucet, you can too. but it can also be done with bankroll or with any amount.

here it goes:
- i claim faucet
- starting amount is max faucet amount but it can be a portion of it to prevent waiting for timer.
- multiplier is on 2x
- on lose back to start (another faucet or other portion of the first faucet)
- (here is the twist) on win switch between hi and lo and click max amount again then roll

i think the strategy is called double or nothing or something like that.

i have had pretty good runs on switching between hi and lo before but never did all in with max amount. so this is also a new part for me.

if you tried this strategy, share how long you went and how much fun you had.

This is old stretagy of making gambling , I know this stretagy of gambling with recover of your loss , here the most of the people entered in the gambling but never get final Profit it is because no one stretagy work for the Gambling , no one can make any big earning through this trick .
Here I myself tried but after the thousands numbers of bet I got lost my bet continuously about 19 times in the high and light simple games of the freenitco.in , so here we should keep in mind that we should not use this trick for the long time gambling .

[ralle14]

After reading the thread I gave it a shot on bitsler went all in on every faucet claim until I can't claim anymore for the day. I didn't had much fun because after winning on my first roll I lose it on the second roll it's just back and forth. Thinking of trying it again on another site with a lower house edge for a higher chance of winning.

[bitcoinmasterlord]

Win or Die strategy!

disclaimers before everyone kills me here:
1. this is not a new strategy, i know. it is a new strategy that "I" am using today.
2. it is not supposed to be good, 100% win,... it is supposed to be fun and exhilarating
3. i am sharing it here for fun purposes because i believe gambling should all be about fun and nothing else.
4. i am using faucet, you can too. but it can also be done with bankroll or with any amount.

here it goes:
- i claim faucet
- starting amount is max faucet amount but it can be a portion of it to prevent waiting for timer.
- multiplier is on 2x
- on lose back to start (another faucet or other portion of the first faucet)
- (here is the twist) on win switch between hi and lo and click max amount again then roll

i think the strategy is called double or nothing or something like that.

i have had pretty good runs on switching between hi and lo before but never did all in with max amount. so this is also a new part for me.

if you tried this strategy, share how long you went and how much fun you had.

This is old stretagy of making gambling , I know this stretagy of gambling with recover of your loss , here the most of the people entered in the gambling but never get final Profit it is because no one stretagy work for the Gambling , no one can make any big earning through this trick .
Here I myself tried but after the thousands numbers of bet I got lost my bet continuously about 19 times in the high and light simple games of the freenitco.in , so here we should keep in mind that we should not use this trick for the long time gambling.

There is no 100% strategy in gambling, you have money to try a new strategy, and you can afford that loss you can play or else stay away from this kind of strategies. I agree that no strategy will work in gambling. Winning in gambling is fully depends on our luck.

[Red-Apple]

i have done more crazy strategy than yours and i started with faucet but setting my betting to 9900x payout and after more than 100 times i decide to stop it because it makes me tired indeed it is almost impossible to won the bets with those setting bets but i'm just curious wanna try it because just like you says it's only for fun

nah, i have tried the high multiplier strategy from 99x to 9900x and that doesn't really interest me. i guess some strategies (for example like this one and my strategy) are just so unique that interest some and doesn't do anything for others.

After reading the thread I gave it a shot on bitsler went all in on every faucet claim until I can't claim anymore for the day. I didn't had much fun because after winning on my first roll I lose it on the second roll it's just back and forth. Thinking of trying it again on another site with a lower house edge for a higher chance of winning.

the trick is to always find a fun way to enjoy gambling.
this is not a strategy to win, or as many people in this board usually want, it is not a strategy to make profit. it is to have fun. and for that you can always mix the strategies and try to come up with new ways.

i have multiple one of these. if my bankroll is empty i start the experiments and then with a full bankroll i start those that worked best or those that i had most fun with.

[marlboroza]

After reading the thread I gave it a shot on bitsler went all in on every faucet claim until I can't claim anymore for the day. I didn't had much fun because after winning on my first roll I lose it on the second roll it's just back and forth. Thinking of trying it again on another site with a lower house edge for a higher chance of winning.

the trick is to always find a fun way to enjoy gambling.
this is not a strategy to win, or as many people in this board usually want, it is not a strategy to make profit. it is to have fun. and for that you can always mix the strategies and try to come up with new ways.

i have multiple one of these. if my bankroll is empty i start the experiments and then with a full bankroll i start those that worked best or those that i had most fun with.

How big is your faucet? Try this one - bet max faucet, multiplier 1.22, raise bet on win 22%. Set some balance/max bet limits too. After you reach, i don't know, buck or two than go with double or nothing method 2-3 times.

[jtipt]

This is a pure luck strategy, I have done this few times when I was bored and I was only claiming the faucet and playing but this is completely based on luck. You get lucky and get few win streaks and make a profit, on the other hand, you can just lose in the first try and stop. It's kinda useless to say that its a strategy to make profit, it can be called a fun way to gamble.

[BlockEye]

This is a pure luck strategy, I have done this few times when I was bored and I was only claiming the faucet and playing but this is completely based on luck. You get lucky and get few win streaks and make a profit, on the other hand, you can just lose in the first try and stop. It's kinda useless to say that its a strategy to make profit, it can be called a fun way to gamble.

Any strategy besides that one is still can consider as pure luck strategy too. All strategy are giving a gambler a guide on his gameplay but that not means that it will the probability of it's winning. Unless you increase the winninh chance rate then it is basically helps boost your chance of winning.Even though you used different strategy you can't tell that it is not a pure luck. What only matters on gambling is what will be the result at the end of your game. So basically gambling especially dice game is just a pure luck.

[gabmen]

This is a pure luck strategy, I have done this few times when I was bored and I was only claiming the faucet and playing but this is completely based on luck. You get lucky and get few win streaks and make a profit, on the other hand, you can just lose in the first try and stop. It's kinda useless to say that its a strategy to make profit, it can be called a fun way to gamble.

Any strategy besides that one is still can consider as pure luck strategy too. All strategy are giving a gambler a guide on his gameplay but that not means that it will the probability of it's winning. Unless you increase the winninh chance rate then it is basically helps boost your chance of winning.Even though you used different strategy you can't tell that it is not a pure luck. What only matters on gambling is what will be the result at the end of your game. So basically gambling especially dice game is just a pure luck.

Well just as op said, its supposed to be for pure fun. It dorsn't matter whether we think its luck or not but having to come upnwith a strategy and in a way seeing positive results definitely makes gambling a lot more fun even with games such as dice.

[RoommateAgreement]

as promised, i have tried this strategy.
this is a good strategy in my opinion, very risky but it is high reward.
but there is a big problem with it when you try it with faucet, and it is an obvious one. if you lose you'll have to wait a long time to be able to claim again. losing happens in a second but you have to wait for example 3 minutes!

someone said open another dice site, that may be a good option but losing both places at the same time means the same wait again.

in any case i was able to win nearly 20000 satoshi in one go and decided to stop there, it is still waiting for me to decide which way i want to go

[daringdiscovered]

The strategy is too aggressive in my opinion but to each his own, I have always preferred to play slowly and play for a long time instead of risking losing all my money in just a few rolls of a dice but as long as you get fun and bet what you can afford to lose then it is fine.

Actually this is a pretty good idea, and this is the strategy that I'm using when I'm playing DICE, but it doesn't work all the time, maybe it is because of the house, they are not going to let us win all the time because they are going to face bankruptcy if this thing happen, that we are always going to win.
The truth is, this strategy work based on our luck, because it os hard to predict every rolls, which is all random.