⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions

[AndySt]

The biggest issue is not the addition of fresh players to the team. The problem is that the players are unable to engage in good gameplay and contribute to the team's success. I believe Pochettino has signed all of the good players he requires for the team, but what he lacks now is the ability to put them into good play by encouraging them to interact with one another and share the same chemistry on the pitch. Pochettino may have done better as manager of Tottenham Hotspur than he is now at Chelsea. I believe he should be given more time to try again. Chelsea is already a dead team; resurrecting a team from the dead is difficult, and it will take time for Chelsea to restore their form. I feel horrible about their situation right now.

Chelsea head coach Mauricio Pochettino himself said on this occasion that his team will be strong when it is full, because he has 12 injured players in the list, which was supplemented by Caicedo, Cucurella and Madueke, and it so happened that young guys and two goalkeepers are on the bench. I myself think that Pochettino is not the coach who is constantly trying to get results from the players available at the moment at any cost, but a more systematic specialist who builds his team with his own style. But it takes time and patience on the part of the club's management and fans.

[asriloni]

Manchester City didn’t do so much in this summer’s transfer window, they focused mainly on strengthening crucial positions in the team. IMO I think Jack Grealish has been an important player in the team since joining from Aston Villa. The good thing is that Manchester City are getting the results for their investments so no need reminiscing on the amount spent on acquiring Grealish or any other player who has been part of the transformation process for City.

Manchester city didn't need to change a lot of things on its club. Pep was just buying some like vacic and doku which have needed to fill the vacant spots that were available in manchester city.
Greaslish was an important player but city is also having a good guy that has been showing impressive performance like doku. Doku has contributed one goal to the city since his debut, which is good enough.
City already had its chemistry and there's no need to destroy it by recruiting as many new players as possible as chelsea. City already complete squad this time.
Manchester city can still play better without gundogan. Im sure that if city will be winning EPL trophy again. The dominatino by city is very hard to be destroyed by other club in EPL.

[flipme]

Since Sir Alex Ferguson left Manchester United, the club has lost their status as one of the best clubs in Europe despite all the huge expenses by the management of the club that's led by the Glazers. So many managers has been hired and so many has also been fired because of lack of poor results which is why most people believes the club's main problem is from the owners of the club hence the call for the Glazers to leave the club.
I've tried to wrap my head around the popular opinion that the Glazers are the reason behind the club's decline but couldn't come with anything as to why they're considered as the reason behind United's poor performances despite all the huge money they've invested in the club.

People look for a scapegoat when things go wrong. Technical directors are the easiest target. But Manchester United, despite working with many managers after Ferguson, including some of the best in the world, never reached the level of greatness of the Ferguson era. So, at this point, I think it is inevitable that fans will demand a change of club bosses. Maybe the Arabs will do it better. They have been very successful at Manchester City. They can do the same thing at Manchester United.

[arimamib]

Since Sir Alex Ferguson left Manchester United, the club has lost their status as one of the best clubs in Europe despite all the huge expenses by the management of the club that's led by the Glazers. So many managers has been hired and so many has also been fired because of lack of poor results which is why most people believes the club's main problem is from the owners of the club hence the call for the Glazers to leave the club.
I've tried to wrap my head around the popular opinion that the Glazers are the reason behind the club's decline but couldn't come with anything as to why they're considered as the reason behind United's poor performances despite all the huge money they've invested in the club.

People look for a scapegoat when things go wrong. Technical directors are the easiest target. But Manchester United, despite working with many managers after Ferguson, including some of the best in the world, never reached the level of greatness of the Ferguson era. So, at this point, I think it is inevitable that fans will demand a change of club bosses. Maybe the Arabs will do it better. They have been very successful at Manchester City. They can do the same thing at Manchester United.

But the big obstacle is the Glazers family. They don't want to let go of Manchester United this season so Manchester United is having difficulty recruiting quality players this season. Even if fans hope that Manchester United can appear more impressive this season, it seems that this will not come true because other teams are stronger than them.

If Manchester United is owned by Arab rulers, I think Manchester United will be stronger in the next season. We would see the Glazers do just that but he is too stingy to commit big budgets to recruiting quality players. This season, Manchester United is experiencing many big problems, starting from their defense line which is not strong enough, plus they don't have a productive quality striker to continue scoring goals.

[Furious 7]

If Manchester United is owned by Arab rulers, I think Manchester United will be stronger in the next season. We would see the Glazers do just that but he is too stingy to commit big budgets to recruiting quality players. This season, Manchester United is experiencing many big problems, starting from their defense line which is not strong enough, plus they don't have a productive quality striker to continue scoring goals.

Some time ago I read that currently the Glazer family is increasingly cornered by its current status and allows it to return to discussing how good potential they have to do for their business because some time ago they saw the same conditions at Everton which was ready to change hands when the previous investor was preparing to acquire Sheffield United and immediately moved to Everton.
Seeing this condition Sheikh Jassim threatened that if they could not with Manchester United then they would immediately make a new acquisition of Tottenham and this made the Glazer Family inflamed whether they wanted to make a decision by releasing to Sheikh Jassim or not.
Currently, there are still Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Sheikh Jassim as the 2 strongest candidates for Manchester United but now it seems that it depends on how the agreement will be built by the two and depends on the benefits offered to the Glazer family for the future of Manchester United.

[arimamib]

If Manchester United is owned by Arab rulers, I think Manchester United will be stronger in the next season. We would see the Glazers do just that but he is too stingy to commit big budgets to recruiting quality players. This season, Manchester United is experiencing many big problems, starting from their defense line which is not strong enough, plus they don't have a productive quality striker to continue scoring goals.

Some time ago I read that currently the Glazer family is increasingly cornered by its current status and allows it to return to discussing how good potential they have to do for their business because some time ago they saw the same conditions at Everton which was ready to change hands when the previous investor was preparing to acquire Sheffield United and immediately moved to Everton.
Seeing this condition Sheikh Jassim threatened that if they could not with Manchester United then they would immediately make a new acquisition of Tottenham and this made the Glazer Family inflamed whether they wanted to make a decision by releasing to Sheikh Jassim or not.
Currently, there are still Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Sheikh Jassim as the 2 strongest candidates for Manchester United but now it seems that it depends on how the agreement will be built by the two and depends on the benefits offered to the Glazer family for the future of Manchester United.

There is no bright spot on the glazers decision to let go of manchester united as he had given a lot of hope to jassim but in reality there was not a single deal in the end. Well, I think Jassim is still quite interested in buying Manchester United, but the only big obstacle is in the Glazers family because they keep delaying.

I haven't heard any news that the owner of Tottenham wants to sell Tottenham to another owner. They are still quite strong and are not shaken by any issues. Currently, only Manchester United is being discussed about being acquired by the Arab authorities, but that has not been resolved because the Glazers do not want to leave Manchester United.

[X-ray]

The biggest issue is not the addition of fresh players to the team. The problem is that the players are unable to engage in good gameplay and contribute to the team's success. I believe Pochettino has signed all of the good players he requires for the team, but what he lacks now is the ability to put them into good play by encouraging them to interact with one another and share the same chemistry on the pitch. Pochettino may have done better as manager of Tottenham Hotspur than he is now at Chelsea. I believe he should be given more time to try again. Chelsea is already a dead team; resurrecting a team from the dead is difficult, and it will take time for Chelsea to restore their form. I feel horrible about their situation right now.

Chelsea head coach Mauricio Pochettino himself said on this occasion that his team will be strong when it is full, because he has 12 injured players in the list, which was supplemented by Caicedo, Cucurella and Madueke, and it so happened that young guys and two goalkeepers are on the bench. I myself think that Pochettino is not the coach who is constantly trying to get results from the players available at the moment at any cost, but a more systematic specialist who builds his team with his own style. But it takes time and patience on the part of the club's management and fans.

The question is why does pochettino still use same strategy instead of change it to get a better result? The current strategy is a complete failed and it's not suitable for chelsea. Look at so many non proper finishing by chelsea players.
The club loses its ability to make proper shoot. I don't even see a single shot that was aiming to get into the right direction where bournemouth's goal keeper can't cover it.
What i can see if all of players are always shoowing straight to the opponent's goal keep which is so dumb. The club can't even use injured player as an excuse as it's responsibility from the club to be fully prepared before facing any match.

[len01]

Till half of the season, is the time I think the management of Chelsea will expend before considering finding a replacement for Pochettino. It isn't his fault really, but if I must say, new players have to adapt to the new environment and style of play as well as team phsychi before being expected to deliver much in return.  
The team needs a very creative player who can really be calm with the ball and link up the attack and midfield with dribbles and accurate passes. Otherwise what we have witnessed in their style of play so far will be replicated in their other competitive games.

If indeed Chelsea management has plans to replace Pochettino as coach, my only question is, how long will Chelsea have to replace the coach repeatedly without any changes?
I saw from last season that Chelsea changed their coach several times but still had the same player performance without any improvement unless Chelsea management gave each coach one season opportunity to get the best strategy or if you really want to build Chelsea stronger, at least look for a new coach who has a lot of experience in all European league teams or major competitions and provides a large enough offer for the prospective new coach so that opportunities for improvement will be more visible when experienced coaches manage this team players. I will not blame the Chelsea players this time because if the players are skilled but not have an experienced coach it will be very far from expectations because skilled players need strategies from the coach.

[QueenVera]

If indeed Chelsea management has plans to replace Pochettino as coach, my only question is, how long will Chelsea have to replace the coach repeatedly without any changes?
I saw from last season that Chelsea changed their coach several times but still had the same player performance without any improvement unless Chelsea management gave each coach one season opportunity to get the best strategy or if you really want to build Chelsea stronger, at least look for a new coach who has a lot of experience in all European league teams or major competitions and provides a large enough offer for the prospective new coach so that opportunities for improvement will be more visible when experienced coaches manage this team players. I will not blame the Chelsea players this time because if the players are skilled but not have an experienced coach it will be very far from expectations because skilled players need strategies from the coach.

  If they end up replacing Pouchettino so early he'll be the fourth coach third coach they've replaced since Todd Boehly took over ownership from the Rússian business man Abrahamovic,and i think they should be patient enough and believe in Pouchettino to get the team back tova better performance because it would be too early for fans to be calling for his sack, i think the grace of two season would be enough for Pouchettino to take Chelsea back to winning ways just like Arsenal did with Arteta when he came into their club, now he's made the team very strong and very tough to play against.

 Pouchettino is an experienced coach and has got an experience in the league before now, about his players, they might notcbe in their best form currently cause some are very young in age and lack the experience but with time they'll begin to pick up because they're talented in as much as they don't got much experience all they need is time to get better.

[armanda90]

People look for a scapegoat when things go wrong. Technical directors are the easiest target. But Manchester United, despite working with many managers after Ferguson, including some of the best in the world, never reached the level of greatness of the Ferguson era. So, at this point, I think it is inevitable that fans will demand a change of club bosses. Maybe the Arabs will do it better. They have been very successful at Manchester City. They can do the same thing at Manchester United.

Manchester United loss glory after Sir Alex Ferguson era, have many managers left and go but United difficult for winning domestic league and Jose Mourinho with good achievement winning Europe League tittles. I don't know why most difficult with Manchester United winning Premier League tittles although they have change more than five manager and waiting almost ten years can't winning domestic league tittle. Contrast with Manchester City consistency winning domestic league and success make Manchester is blue for last several season, have been ten years Manchester United can't winning domestic league and difference with Manchester City winning have winning six Premier League trophies after last winning tittle from United. For this season seems not promising with Manchester United performance, I don't list United in favorite team for winning domestic league.

[Despairo]

If indeed Chelsea management has plans to replace Pochettino as coach, my only question is, how long will Chelsea have to replace the coach repeatedly without any changes?
I saw from last season that Chelsea changed their coach several times but still had the same player performance without any improvement unless Chelsea management gave each coach one season opportunity to get the best strategy or if you really want to build Chelsea stronger, at least look for a new coach who has a lot of experience in all European league teams or major competitions and provides a large enough offer for the prospective new coach so that opportunities for improvement will be more visible when experienced coaches manage this team players. I will not blame the Chelsea players this time because if the players are skilled but not have an experienced coach it will be very far from expectations because skilled players need strategies from the coach.

6-12 months is enough to see the quality of the coach, Chelsea need to change their coach to prevent from possible big lose. Both of Pochettino and Potter are like to spend big money for unnecessary thing, Chelsea need to find a coach that prefer to develop the players than signing new players e.g. Klopp.

My suggestion Chelsea need to sign Vincent Kompany, I believe Chelsea have enough money to buy out from Burnley.

[rendravolt]

Manchester City didn’t do so much in this summer’s transfer window, they focused mainly on strengthening crucial positions in the team. IMO I think Jack Grealish has been an important player in the team since joining from Aston Villa. The good thing is that Manchester City are getting the results for their investments so no need reminiscing on the amount spent on acquiring Grealish or any other player who has been part of the transformation process for City.

So far, there is no position that is particularly worrying, especially considering that even the bench players are already on par with the main players. Jack Grealish is indeed an important part and he even had doubts when he was brought in by Manchester City for 117 million euros in 2021 because he felt he had a big responsibility and had to be able to make a contribution commensurate with that price. However, it seems that it didn't take long for Jack Grealish to prove his quality to Pep Guardiola and until now he has become an irreplaceable right winger.

[asriloni]

If indeed Chelsea management has plans to replace Pochettino as coach, my only question is, how long will Chelsea have to replace the coach repeatedly without any changes?
I saw from last season that Chelsea changed their coach several times but still had the same player performance without any improvement unless Chelsea management gave each coach one season opportunity to get the best strategy or if you really want to build Chelsea stronger, at least look for a new coach who has a lot of experience in all European league teams or major competitions and provides a large enough offer for the prospective new coach so that opportunities for improvement will be more visible when experienced coaches manage this team players. I will not blame the Chelsea players this time because if the players are skilled but not have an experienced coach it will be very far from expectations because skilled players need strategies from the coach.

6-12 months is enough to see the quality of the coach, Chelsea need to change their coach to prevent from possible big lose. Both of Pochettino and Potter are like to spend big money for unnecessary thing, Chelsea need to find a coach that prefer to develop the players than signing new players e.g. Klopp.

True but there is also the risk when the coach will not able to change the situation in the club. It will put chelsea into the risk by staying at the bottom. The club needs to gamble to keep poch or replace him with a new coach. I don't know why chelsea has picked him instead of de zerbi or something else. Todd has been making some bad choices regarding his decision for the club. The club has been downgrade since todd has been acquiring chelsea from the old owner. Chelsea needs to go up as soon as possible.
It's always struggling when facing the weak clubs in EPL. The last season story is just repeating to the chelsea.

My suggestion Chelsea need to sign Vincent Kompany, I believe Chelsea have enough money to buy out from Burnley.

That guy could be a good option but i would prefer chelsea to take xabi alonso as a new appointment if the club needs a new coach. Look at how xabi could bring leverkusen at the top by doing win streak after he was replacing the old coach. Chelsea needs someone who can motivate whole of its players.

[Docnaster]

Manchester City didn’t do so much in this summer’s transfer window, they focused mainly on strengthening crucial positions in the team. IMO I think Jack Grealish has been an important player in the team since joining from Aston Villa. The good thing is that Manchester City are getting the results for their investments so no need reminiscing on the amount spent on acquiring Grealish or any other player who has been part of the transformation process for City.

So far, there is no position that is particularly worrying, especially considering that even the bench players are already on par with the main players. Jack Grealish is indeed an important part and he even had doubts when he was brought in by Manchester City for 117 million euros in 2021 because he felt he had a big responsibility and had to be able to make a contribution commensurate with that price. However, it seems that it didn't take long for Jack Grealish to prove his quality to Pep Guardiola and until now he has become an irreplaceable right winger.

Jack Grealish is a very important member of the Manchester City squad and before his was injured, he was a regular starter for the club. Manchester City didn't not waste the money they used in signing him from Aston Villa and despite the arrival of Jeremy Doku who has been sensational in the left wing of Manchester City's attack,  I think Grealish is still gonna get playing opportunities when he returns from injury.
Pep Guardiola is one manager who's is very good in rotating his squad and I believe he already knows how to make use of Grealish when he's finally back to the squad.

[bering]

Manchester City didn’t do so much in this summer’s transfer window, they focused mainly on strengthening crucial positions in the team. IMO I think Jack Grealish has been an important player in the team since joining from Aston Villa. The good thing is that Manchester City are getting the results for their investments so no need reminiscing on the amount spent on acquiring Grealish or any other player who has been part of the transformation process for City.

Basically Manchester City already solid so Guardiola is not too necessary to bought many players to build new squad and so far Manctester City has bought at least 4 important players this summer and mostly they bought new midfielder and at least they buy 3 players on that position and they are Matheus Nunes, Jérémy Doku and Mateo Kovacic and i can understand why Guardiola want to buy these players because this summer they lost Gundogan and Riyadh Mahrez so Manchester City immediately have to find the replacement of those playes and do not forget too their new defender Josko Gvardiol which is being an the most expensive defender player this summer and think these transfers were sucessful because all of these players can adapt quickly with Guardiola strategy and they also can able to performing well

[Razmirraz]

Pochettino may have done better as manager of Tottenham Hotspur than he is now at Chelsea. I believe he should be given more time to try again. Chelsea is already a dead team; resurrecting a team from the dead is difficult, and it will take time for Chelsea to restore their form. I feel horrible about their situation right now.

He will remain coach for as long as possible in Chelsea.

 It is not an easy job and problem that he has inherited as coach. The ability to win games is there at Chelsea, they are not just using their opportunities properly yet. The problem with Chelsea team is not the players, the problem is that the coach has not been able to find the best Chelsea XI to start games since the best Chelsea XI that he put together in the preseason was scattered due to injuries to many of the key players.

Not always, Chelsea management will measure and consider his performance as long as he is trusted as Chelsea coach. Management wants his team to provide the best performance, so Pochettino is expected to be able to improve Chelsea's performance, especially during the transfer market, Chelsea is very active in spending players. Patience has limits, Chelsea management still hopes that Pochettino will be able to return Chelsea to its best form. If he fails, then dismissal is inevitable.

[Hirose UK]

I have just looked at some of the history of the best players that Brazil has and am interested in seeing the career history of Ronaldinho the star player from Brazil after Pele who managed to make great achievements and achievements in the history of football.
Ronaldinho had a pretty good football career he even became a gold star in his time when he played with Barcelona and AC Milan but unfortunately at the end of his retirement Ronaldinho had a history of transfers to play with teams that were not very well known or top big teams.
Even after retiring Ronaldinho lived a bitter and difficult life and even went to prison after retiring.

If you look at the history of Ronaldinho it is very different from today top players who have careers at the end of retirement but instead have wealth and are still playing with a team that is able to provide large payments for later retirement savings from the football industry.

[Furious 7]

Some time ago I read that currently the Glazer family is increasingly cornered by its current status and allows it to return to discussing how good potential they have to do for their business because some time ago they saw the same conditions at Everton which was ready to change hands when the previous investor was preparing to acquire Sheffield United and immediately moved to Everton.
Seeing this condition Sheikh Jassim threatened that if they could not with Manchester United then they would immediately make a new acquisition of Tottenham and this made the Glazer Family inflamed whether they wanted to make a decision by releasing to Sheikh Jassim or not.
Currently, there are still Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Sheikh Jassim as the 2 strongest candidates for Manchester United but now it seems that it depends on how the agreement will be built by the two and depends on the benefits offered to the Glazer family for the future of Manchester United.

There is no bright spot on the glazers decision to let go of manchester united as he had given a lot of hope to jassim but in reality there was not a single deal in the end. Well, I think Jassim is still quite interested in buying Manchester United, but the only big obstacle is in the Glazers family because they keep delaying.

I haven't heard any news that the owner of Tottenham wants to sell Tottenham to another owner. They are still quite strong and are not shaken by any issues. Currently, only Manchester United is being discussed about being acquired by the Arab authorities, but that has not been resolved because the Glazers do not want to leave Manchester United.

Involving Tottenham is like a kind of bluff because with his current condition Jassim seems to be getting hot because his good intentions in acquiring a club are not very well seen and seem to be played but indeed in the end things like this are also not very good if the Glazer Family let it continue because they must realize that conditions like this can interfere with Manchester United itself.
Now even though there is no significant impact but this still disrupts the eleltability of Manchester United which makes all ultimately affected.
The problem is too complex for Glazer if he tries to keep Manchester United too because we know that in detail in the last few seasons fans always want Glazer to leave and this is not the first time the fans of United have reacted like that.

[Strongkored]

  If they end up replacing Pouchettino so early he'll be the fourth coach third coach they've replaced since Todd Boehly took over ownership from the Rússian business man Abrahamovic,and i think they should be patient enough and believe in Pouchettino to get the team back tova better performance because it would be too early for fans to be calling for his sack, i think the grace of two season would be enough for Pouchettino to take Chelsea back to winning ways just like Arsenal did with Arteta when he came into their club, now he's made the team very strong and very tough to play against.

 Pouchettino is an experienced coach and has got an experience in the league before now, about his players, they might notcbe in their best form currently cause some are very young in age and lack the experience but with time they'll begin to pick up because they're talented in as much as they don't got much experience all they need is time to get better.

I don't think that Todd Boehly will replace Pochettino immediately, because this coach has already spent a lot in the transfer market, and changing coaches will not guarantee that there will be changes, we can see when Graham Potter was at Chelsea, Boehly was patient enough to wait for the coach to bring him in. Chelsea is heading in a better direction, only to fail.
Many predict that Chelsea's current situation is because many of their players are injured, maybe that is true but it also proves that Pochettino is not a coach with a lot of strategy, he relies on his strategy on players who are considered capable of doing it and when it doesn't work he doesn't change anything other than waiting until it can work as it wishes.
I predict changes will be made in the middle of the season when nothing good happens to Chelsea, indeed it looks too late because in the middle of the season if their position has not improved it will be difficult to end up in the European zone, but we don't know for sure what will happen in a few months, maybe something good will finally happen to Chelsea, because I don't believe that Chelsea will stay like this without any improvement at all.

[topbitcoin]

I don't think that Todd Boehly will replace Pochettino immediately, because this coach has already spent a lot in the transfer market, and changing coaches will not guarantee that there will be changes, we can see when Graham Potter was at Chelsea, Boehly was patient enough to wait for the coach to bring him in. Chelsea is heading in a better direction, only to fail.
Many predict that Chelsea's current situation is because many of their players are injured, maybe that is true but it also proves that Pochettino is not a coach with a lot of strategy, he relies on his strategy on players who are considered capable of doing it and when it doesn't work he doesn't change anything other than waiting until it can work as it wishes.
I predict changes will be made in the middle of the season when nothing good happens to Chelsea, indeed it looks too late because in the middle of the season if their position has not improved it will be difficult to end up in the European zone, but we don't know for sure what will happen in a few months, maybe something good will finally happen to Chelsea, because I don't believe that Chelsea will stay like this without any improvement at all.

I've said before that changing coaches too soon won't help them improve their performance and that's still true now.
Todd should be aware that the number of times he changed coaches during his tenure at Chelsea but the results remained the same and nothing has changed in this regard so removing Pochettino at this time is also not the right answer to improve the club.

Unless he wants the same thing over and over again as happened for Chelsea last season. The initial choice when making Pochettino as coach should they realize that the worst possibility is like this but when the decision has been made and Poche is already in charge of Chelsea this season then Todd should not retreat and must entrust at least until half of the season or the end of the season to see his decision this time is right or not.