⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions

[Ojima-ojo]

Musiala is a very young talent prospect and he's proved himself at Bayern Munich however I heard rumors that's he no longer interested in staying at Bayern Munich due to lack of playing time, and I believe that's why several clubs have been attracted to him recently, clubs like Manchester City, Realmadrid as well as liverpool, well when it comes to finances Liverpool might not be able to compete with City or Madrid, but they could be boosted by the funds they'll get from MO Salah's sale to the Saudi Pro League.

 Well Musiala is not the only bayern player liverpool are interested in for Salah's replacement, I've also heard they're interested in Leroy Sane as well, and I believe Sane might be better than Musiala based on his experience in the EPL coupled with the fact that he's as skilled and fast like Salah and his price is cheaper than Musiala, Sane's market value is anout €75m.

Bayern Munich have outstanding players, we know the ones that are sellable and the ones that are not. Thomas Tuchel can not afford to lose such an outstanding brilliant player, Bayern Munich can triggered the sell option of any other player but in the situation of Jamal Musiala, I don't think they would even consider a bid place for him from aby club. Jamal Musiala is my favorite player because he's highly skilled and in good positions to net goals for his team. Bayern Munich's thoughts on selling him? I don't think so because his presence is needed at Allianz Arena and he's a prominent player that's keen on exploring in Bayern Munich.

The problem with selling off your players during such transfers is that when you need the quality of such players in the future you may find it difficult to achieve that and at some point, you may have to stay focused and above as a club not to lose such players, it doesn't matter the amount offered, what matters some time is the ability to get a replacement that will fill innthe gap.


Not just replacement alone that is needed but also, a good back in case of injury, so for now instead of them considering selling the player to either Manchester City or Real Madrid, it is better to continue and renew the contract of the player to be able to build a good foundation for future results.

[temple]

Musiala is a very young talent prospect and he's proved himself at Bayern Munich however I heard rumors that's he no longer interested in staying at Bayern Munich due to lack of playing time, and I believe that's why several clubs have been attracted to him recently, clubs like Manchester City, Realmadrid as well as liverpool, well when it comes to finances Liverpool might not be able to compete with City or Madrid, but they could be boosted by the funds they'll get from MO Salah's sale to the Saudi Pro League.

 Well Musiala is not the only bayern player liverpool are interested in for Salah's replacement, I've also heard they're interested in Leroy Sane as well, and I believe Sane might be better than Musiala based on his experience in the EPL coupled with the fact that he's as skilled and fast like Salah and his price is cheaper than Musiala, Sane's market value is anout €75m.

Bayern Munich have outstanding players, we know the ones that are sellable and the ones that are not. Thomas Tuchel can not afford to lose such an outstanding brilliant player, Bayern Munich can triggered the sell option of any other player but in the situation of Jamal Musiala, I don't think they would even consider a bid place for him from aby club. Jamal Musiala is my favorite player because he's highly skilled and in good positions to net goals for his team. Bayern Munich's thoughts on selling him? I don't think so because his presence is needed at Allianz Arena and he's a prominent player that's keen on exploring in Bayern Munich.

The problem with selling off your players during such transfers is that when you need the quality of such players in the future you may find it difficult to achieve that and at some point, you may have to stay focused and above as a club not to lose such players, it doesn't matter the amount offered, what matters some time is the ability to get a replacement that will fill innthe gap.


Not just replacement alone that is needed but also, a good back in case of injury, so for now instead of them considering selling the player to either Manchester City or Real Madrid, it is better to continue and renew the contract of the player to be able to build a good foundation for future results.

Bayern Munich can be absolutely relaxed in regards to a possible Musiala transfer. There is nothing to worry about as Musiala has a contract that will expire by summer 2026. He may not extend his contract for the time being, which seems to be the case according to some reports, but still Bayern Munich has plenty of time to come up with their own plan and also a package, but first of all they can calmly and carefully observe the situation and see how Musiala develops over the next two years. I doubt that Bayern Munich would sell him for 100 million. I think they wouldn't consider that for a second. He most likely will get better in the next two years, increase in value and he might also change his mind and rather stay in Munich.

[Leviathan.007]

Dominic King started talking about Manchester City and Cole Palmer. He believes Pep Guardiola made a mistake but selling their young player, Cole Palmer.
Cole Palmer left Manchester City while he was playing these since he was a kid and joined Chelsea for 55 million euros and in the game against Arsenal, he scored a goal against this team.



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12662579/Dominic-King-insists-Guardiola-WRONG-sell-Cole-Palmer-Chelsea-42-5m-winger-scored-against-Arsenal-Chris-Sutton-says-doubt-Peps-judgement-hosts-clash-Mail-Sports-Kicking-podcast.html

[KTChampions]

The question is Liverpool afford to spend a high amount of money to sign Musiala? Their biggest transfer was Nunez which they spent for 85 Million Euros, Musiala's market value is 115 Million Euros, it's really big for Liverpool.

I think Klopp will try to find an alternative player which play in weak club or small league rather than sign a star player.

The question is also whether 115 million is hight amount now? Prices have risen not only because of inflation, but also because of the growth of football itself as a business (and thanks to the Saudis, of course). This is the reality, it must be accepted, even Bayern, which resisted for a long time, was able to do this and paid a lot of money for the not too young Kane, and even in conditions when his contract was expiring in just a year.

[shogun47]

The question is Liverpool afford to spend a high amount of money to sign Musiala? Their biggest transfer was Nunez which they spent for 85 Million Euros, Musiala's market value is 115 Million Euros, it's really big for Liverpool.

I think Klopp will try to find an alternative player which play in weak club or small league rather than sign a star player.

The question is also whether 115 million is hight amount now? Prices have risen not only because of inflation, but also because of the growth of football itself as a business (and thanks to the Saudis, of course). This is the reality, it must be accepted, even Bayern, which resisted for a long time, was able to do this and paid a lot of money for the not too young Kane, and even in conditions when his contract was expiring in just a year.

Also, everyone in the business knows how much money a club has that is interested. One good example is also the transfer of R. Kolo to PSG, when it was about to fail but in the last minutes when the transfer window was still open, PSG topped up their offer once more and Frankfurt cashed in a huge amount in transfer fees. I think Frankfurt once signed him as a free agent? I believe that was the case and since Frankfurt knew that PSG won't let a transfer fail for 10 million more or less, they really risked to wait until only minutes were left for the transfer to be finalized.

[rahmad2nd]

Jamal Musiala is a talented player for sure. He has his best moments and he was sometimes performing less than expected and widely criticised by fans.
There is Liverpool who was interested in him to replace Mohamed Salah, in addition to Real Madrid and Manchester City. There isn't talks right now between Musiala and Bayern Munich to extend the contract which will expire in 2026 tho and the player expressed his admiration for EPL. I don't think Bayern Munich will prevent him from leaving if he wants.

The question is Liverpool afford to spend a high amount of money to sign Musiala? Their biggest transfer was Nunez which they spent for 85 Million Euros, Musiala's market value is 115 Million Euros, it's really big for Liverpool.

I think Klopp will try to find an alternative player which play in weak club or small league rather than sign a star player.

It is possible that one day Musiala will leave Bayern Munich. Moreover, several rumors say that Musiala apparently has the main target, namely winning the Champions League and winning the Balon D'0r, as reported by Sky Sports. moving in the summer of 2025, is considered the right moment to look for a new club.
Moreover, at this moment, the opportunity to change uniforms is wide open. While waiting for that moment to come, Musiala has revealed two clubs that could be suitable places for him to pursue his main career targets.
Another rumor, Madrid itself is already planning to hire Musiala to partner Jude Bellingham, even though they don't know when that step will happen. Meanwhile, City has so far remained silent.

Referring to the Sky Sports report, it seems that the statement made by the Bayern player is most likely true. and if these two teams are really interested in Musiala's services, they will have no difficulty in investing and bringing in Musiala for the transfer value. However, there is always bargaining and mediation if there is communication.
Referring to what you said, we really agree. but we change the question, it's not that Liverpool can't bring him. However, is Liverpool's owner willing to spend such fantastic funds?  the answer is, no. That's why the Liverpool owner is very happy if Jurgen Klopp stays at Anfield. because the coach doesn't demand much when it comes to bringing in new arrivals, especially star players with high transfer value.

[AakZaki]

It seems that the case of Sancho and Ten Hag has not found the best solution. Sancho also apologized. Reportedly Man United have opened discussions for teams who want to use their energy. At the beginning I heard Dortmund might be a new place for Sancho. But there is news if Man United open the possibility of loan to Serie A, Bundesliga and Turkey Super Lig. Maybe the loan option will be done in January. Because until now this problem continues, Sancho has even been kicked out of the first team in 5 weeks. 

Source: https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/12988195/jadon-sancho-transfer-man-utd-winger-drawing-interest-from-across-europe-amid-erik-ten-hag-stand-off

[klidex]

It seems that the case of Sancho and Ten Hag has not found the best solution. Sancho also apologized. Reportedly Man United have opened discussions for teams who want to use their energy. At the beginning I heard Dortmund might be a new place for Sancho. But there is news if Man United open the possibility of loan to Serie A, Bundesliga and Turkey Super Lig. Maybe the loan option will be done in January. Because until now this problem continues, Sancho has even been kicked out of the first team in 5 weeks. 

Source: https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/12988195/jadon-sancho-transfer-man-utd-winger-drawing-interest-from-across-europe-amid-erik-ten-hag-stand-off

This case does seem a bit complicated because both parties, Sancho and Erik Ten Hag, both don't want to admit to forgiving each other after fixing everything so they can continue to join Manchester United and be able to have a longer career at the club, but in fact it's not that easy as it seems. The fairly young player Sancho has a bigger ego and Erik Ten Hag admits that he is older and doesn't deserve to apologize so he not have a solution to solve the problem because both parties are equally stubborn.
Loaning Sancho to another club in Serie A or the Bundesliga like an unreasonable effort because Sancho has been kicked out of Manchester United, it would make more sense to sell the player, but if you loan him to another club like Manchester United, you still hope that this player will change his mind behaved better after the loan period ended and I understand this problem because Sancho has quite good talent which one day Manchester United will need.

[QueenVera]

It seems that the case of Sancho and Ten Hag has not found the best solution. Sancho also apologized. Reportedly Man United have opened discussions for teams who want to use their energy. At the beginning I heard Dortmund might be a new place for Sancho. But there is news if Man United open the possibility of loan to Serie A, Bundesliga and Turkey Super Lig. Maybe the loan option will be done in January. Because until now this problem continues, Sancho has even been kicked out of the first team in 5 weeks. 

Well with what I understand about the whole Sancho situation is that he's made up his mind to leave his club that's why he's refusing to apologise to the manager as expected, well I feel sorry for him, because he's not helping himself instead of apologising to the manager and go back to training with his teammates to maintain his form, rather he's decided not to an I currently attending the games of the Jnr team.

 Being out of the team from now till Jan without training could affect his form, however there are several clubs that's interested in signing Sancho especially his former club Borussia Dortmund but I doubt if Manchester united would accept a loan deal for Sancho, they might decide to sale him completely and use the money to strengthen their squad during the winter windows.

[ginsan]

It seems that the case of Sancho and Ten Hag has not found the best solution. Sancho also apologized. Reportedly Man United have opened discussions for teams who want to use their energy. At the beginning I heard Dortmund might be a new place for Sancho. But there is news if Man United open the possibility of loan to Serie A, Bundesliga and Turkey Super Lig. Maybe the loan option will be done in January. Because until now this problem continues, Sancho has even been kicked out of the first team in 5 weeks. 

Source: https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/12988195/jadon-sancho-transfer-man-utd-winger-drawing-interest-from-across-europe-amid-erik-ten-hag-stand-off

Sancho will not regret the decision not to apologize to the coach and he seems to have made up his mind to leave Manchester United in the January transfer window. There is no resolution to their relationship, which means Sancho will have to leave Manchester United if he wants his career to develop again. On the other hand, we know that Erik Ten Hag has had two disputes with players, especially with Ronaldo, where there was no end point for a resolution, at that time Ronaldo had to leave Manchester United.

And for Sancho, it is likely that he will also have the same fate as Ronaldo, where he has to leave Manchester United in this transfer window. I'm sure he will get a team that can appreciate his services next season. Let's just wait for this drama to take place and of course Sancho will remain firm and will not apologize to Erik Ten Hag.

[Furious 7]

It seems that the case of Sancho and Ten Hag has not found the best solution. Sancho also apologized. Reportedly Man United have opened discussions for teams who want to use their energy. At the beginning I heard Dortmund might be a new place for Sancho. But there is news if Man United open the possibility of loan to Serie A, Bundesliga and Turkey Super Lig. Maybe the loan option will be done in January. Because until now this problem continues, Sancho has even been kicked out of the first team in 5 weeks. 

Source: https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/12988195/jadon-sancho-transfer-man-utd-winger-drawing-interest-from-across-europe-amid-erik-ten-hag-stand-off

IMO for this case I don't think it will find any light before one of them leaves.
This is one way for them not to argue because after all with Ten Hag's high ego it will be very difficult to let Sancho now especially for him to relent. On the other hand, Sancho will also not try to do anything especially now that he has been banned from training and others such as not being able to use the facilities that Manchester United has according to some rumors this will clearly make him more offended and this will make the split even bigger so that nothing can be done other than one of them deciding to leave Manchester United and this possibility is Sancho who leaves.

[Velvet78]

De Gea is still free agent. I saw a source claiming that Manchester United might rethink of signing him back. However that source was The Sun so I don't believe anything they publish.  

Apart from that it is said he can even decide for an early retirement depending on his getting a satisfying offer from a team. I hope he doesn't get retired this early in his career. 32 isn't an old age for a goalkeeper. Especially for a great goalkeeper like him. Probably teams from Europe don't want to approach due to his high demand. Otherwise I don't know the reason. Maybe he would get an offer from Saudi Arabia or Qatar.

[arimamib]

De Gea is still free agent. I saw a source claiming that Manchester United might rethink of signing him back. However that source was The Sun so I don't believe anything they publish.  

Apart from that it is said he can even decide for an early retirement depending on his getting a satisfying offer from a team. I hope he doesn't get retired this early in his career. 32 isn't an old age for a goalkeeper. Especially for a great goalkeeper like him. Probably teams from Europe don't want to approach due to his high demand. Otherwise I don't know the reason. Maybe he would get an offer from Saudi Arabia or Qatar.

He has not yet found a team for his next career after ending his contract with Manchester United. I saw that De Gea was often linked with Saudi Arabian league teams in the previous transfer window but until the end of the transfer window closed he had not found a team for his next career.

He is not old and he can still play for the next 5 seasons because his position is goalkeeper. We'll see in the winter transfer window where he will join or whether he will go to Al Nassr to reunite with Ronaldo or continue to choose a team in Europe. I think Manchester United is quite comfortable with Onana and they definitely won't re-sign De Gea because it could ruin the atmosphere within the team.

[red4slash]

De Gea is still free agent. I saw a source claiming that Manchester United might rethink of signing him back. However that source was The Sun so I don't believe anything they publish.  

Apart from that it is said he can even decide for an early retirement depending on his getting a satisfying offer from a team. I hope he doesn't get retired this early in his career. 32 isn't an old age for a goalkeeper. Especially for a great goalkeeper like him. Probably teams from Europe don't want to approach due to his high demand. Otherwise I don't know the reason. Maybe he would get an offer from Saudi Arabia or Qatar.

Indeed, there are some reports that say that Manchester United plans to bring De Gea back but in this case I feel not too sure because seeing from his condition as if he was dumped even though De Gea has a desire to stay at Manchester United and is even willing to reduce his salary, I think this should be something that De Gea cannot refuse.
But indeed in this case we also cannot be completely sure that he will not really return because all possibilities can still occur in this case it's just that for me this is a little heavy if De Gea returns to Manchester United who expelled him from Old Trafford last season.

[GbitG]

De Gea is still free agent. I saw a source claiming that Manchester United might rethink of signing him back. However that source was The Sun so I don't believe anything they publish.  

Apart from that it is said he can even decide for an early retirement depending on his getting a satisfying offer from a team. I hope he doesn't get retired this early in his career. 32 isn't an old age for a goalkeeper. Especially for a great goalkeeper like him. Probably teams from Europe don't want to approach due to his high demand. Otherwise I don't know the reason. Maybe he would get an offer from Saudi Arabia or Qatar.

I don't think that David De Gea is interested in Manchester United again, and if he comes back to Manchester United, then it will be a fortune for Manchester United. Obviously, the way Onana is performing poorly, David De Gea was a thousand times better than him in every respect. But now Onana has also started performing well. In the UEFA Champions League, the winning penalty against Copenhagen was limited. David De Gea should not retire yet because he still has the qualities required for a world-class goalkeeper. If he retires due to not taking interest in any clubs, then it is a big mistake by David De Gea. It is better that he does not retire and continues his career in Saudi Arabia instead of Europe.

[Iroh]

Victor Osimhen has an impressive record at Napoli, one which will live on even after his career but I have a feeling that his stay at Napoli is gradually coming to an end after issue that surfaced earlier between him and the club. That’s enough reason to make a player feel unwelcome. I also feel it will play a major role in his decision to continue or stay and in my honest opinion I want him to leave.

I think the clubs actions and refusal to formally acknowledge their wrongdoing and apologize for the insensitive “joke” that the player didn’t find funny or acceptable helped to make things worse. If they had apologized, no matter how insincere it may be, I don’t think he would be thinking that much about leaving Napoli. He has obviously enjoyed playing at the club and the club should respect all its players especially one that has contributed so much to the success of the club.
He may not feel respected after all of that and his position is perfectly understandable.

[tiCeR]

De Gea is still free agent. I saw a source claiming that Manchester United might rethink of signing him back. However that source was The Sun so I don't believe anything they publish.  

Apart from that it is said he can even decide for an early retirement depending on his getting a satisfying offer from a team. I hope he doesn't get retired this early in his career. 32 isn't an old age for a goalkeeper. Especially for a great goalkeeper like him. Probably teams from Europe don't want to approach due to his high demand. Otherwise I don't know the reason. Maybe he would get an offer from Saudi Arabia or Qatar.

I don't think that David De Gea is interested in Manchester United again, and if he comes back to Manchester United, then it will be a fortune for Manchester United. Obviously, the way Onana is performing poorly, David De Gea was a thousand times better than him in every respect. But now Onana has also started performing well. In the UEFA Champions League, the winning penalty against Copenhagen was limited. David De Gea should not retire yet because he still has the qualities required for a world-class goalkeeper. If he retires due to not taking interest in any clubs, then it is a big mistake by David De Gea. It is better that he does not retire and continues his career in Saudi Arabia instead of Europe.

David de Gea has his own history of calamitous mistakes that sometimes cost Manchester United the game. In this case overall attention was very high and focused on Onana as the goalkeeper position caused a lot of public discussion because of the deadlock situation that ten Hag created due to his bad way of communication. It reminds me of the situation that Harry Maguire is in. The media have been pushing a certain topic so hard that people begin to focus on only one or two things that are happening in the club. Is Onana making a mistake? Is Maguire making a mistake? I am not defending any of those two, but they are not the only ones to blame when these situations happen. Manchester United is playing a horrible season and it is no surprise to me that if a bad team plays in front of a goalkeeper, the time will come that the goalkeeper also pays the price for that.

[bering]

Jamal Musiala is a talented player for sure. He has his best moments and he was sometimes performing less than expected and widely criticised by fans.
There is Liverpool who was interested in him to replace Mohamed Salah, in addition to Real Madrid and Manchester City. There isn't talks right now between Musiala and Bayern Munich to extend the contract which will expire in 2026 tho and the player expressed his admiration for EPL. I don't think Bayern Munich will prevent him from leaving if he wants.

The question is Liverpool afford to spend a high amount of money to sign Musiala? Their biggest transfer was Nunez which they spent for 85 Million Euros, Musiala's market value is 115 Million Euros, it's really big for Liverpool.

I think Klopp will try to find an alternative player which play in weak club or small league rather than sign a star player.

Jamal Musiala transfer value currently almost reach to 100 millions but the price probably will be increase if there is a team who really interested to him and Liverpool hasn't showing their respond yet to this rumour but maybe if Klopp really want Musiala then not impossible for Liverpool to bought Musiala this winter but indeed this rumour was appears because after lose to compete with Thomas Muller to gets one place on Bayern Munich starting eleven then Jamal Musiala starting to thinking his future in this team because he want to gets more minutes to play and leave Bayern

Liverpool is not the only team who showing their interest because Manchester City and Real Madrid are reported watching him and if this rumour is true i think it's hard for Liverpool to gets him because more likely Musiala will choose Madrid or Manchester City especially these teams also has money and they are willing to spend a lot of money to gets the players they want

[Oluwa-btc]

De Gea is still free agent. I saw a source claiming that Manchester United might rethink of signing him back. However that source was The Sun so I don't believe anything they publish.  

Apart from that it is said he can even decide for an early retirement depending on his getting a satisfying offer from a team. I hope he doesn't get retired this early in his career. 32 isn't an old age for a goalkeeper. Especially for a great goalkeeper like him. Probably teams from Europe don't want to approach due to his high demand. Otherwise I don't know the reason. Maybe he would get an offer from Saudi Arabia or Qatar.

Returning? That would be unwise idea to consider. Manchester United literally snubbed David De Gea after agreements on reducing his contract for a lesser one and they didn't keep to his own part of the bargain. Now wanting a player disrespected back into the club won't go easy. There might be little atom of truth Innit!
David De Gea should have known better what it looks like to return to Manchester United ( Let's take for example Cristiano Ronaldo who has played at thr highest level of his career and how he was disrespected )

He wanted a job around his family in Spain but he obviously has non. He has achieved a lot, if he chose to go Into retirements, it's fine.
Offers / Calls must have been flooding and ringing his Cellphone, if he wanted to move there, Ronaldo would have been his agent already to on of them sides over tue Saudi Arabian Premier League.

[borovichok]

De Gea is still free agent. I saw a source claiming that Manchester United might rethink of signing him back. However that source was The Sun so I don't believe anything they publish.  

Apart from that it is said he can even decide for an early retirement depending on his getting a satisfying offer from a team. I hope he doesn't get retired this early in his career. 32 isn't an old age for a goalkeeper. Especially for a great goalkeeper like him. Probably teams from Europe don't want to approach due to his high demand. Otherwise I don't know the reason. Maybe he would get an offer from Saudi Arabia or Qatar.

David de Gea is a free agent this season and currently without a club since exiting Old Trafford. The spanish goalkeeper is keen on making good runs for European elite teams and he's absolutely not interested in Saudi Pro League bids. That's reasons behind David de Gea turning Down their offers, rumours circulates round about Manchester United keen on signing him back but I think that's an impossible action for the Red Devils to pull. Moreover the new signing, André Onana having terrible time but he recently deliver his club and they're back to winning level, Onana have potentials to explore for United is just a matter of time.