⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions

[Dunamisx]

This is another source I have found which is telling us about the potential Ødegaard to Galatasaray deal...

However the main source is a Turkish journalist and he is a Galatasaray fan according to his X profile. Therefore I'm not sure how trusted he would be.  

If this deal happens, the Turkish side will gain lots of power. However why would Arsenal like to let him go now?

Honestly this has to be verified as you have said if it is true or not, but that being said, anything is possible because we are at the open window for transfer and there could be many speculations about players intention in moving from one team to another.

As regards Arsenal, I don't think it is the best moment for them to be able to allow any player leave since they are somewhat along the line, their matches recently has been impressive and then they just had the best team that could possibly deliver for them even in the next season the way they perform this just concluded one.

[Btcdeybodi]

I don't think Real Madrid need a player like Fernandes. What Real Madrid need is somebody who knows how to manage the team's tempo, somebody who can replace Modric and Kroos. The Argentinian is a very good player but he doesn't have that ability, he is good doing a little bit of everything but I don't think he really excels in something. Real Madrid need a different kind of player.

And the ideal profile that comes to mind is no other person but the Portuguese, Vitinha who currently plays for Paris Saint-Germany.  I think Real Madrid management will eventually look into the midfield repair come January transfer window but right now, the backing e has been built up brilliantly by Jose Mourinho bringing in players who can both attack at the same time defend. I have this feeling they could emerge Champions in La Liga but the Champions League competition? I'm not confident!

Yeah, Vitinha can fit in well in that capacity because he almost have same character as Michael Olise, the only difference between both players is that one is a defensive midfielder while the other is an attacking midfielder. Though i don't think that PSG will be willing to let him out after all he still has a running contract with them until 2029. Vitinha would have been a perfect signing for Jose Mourinho since he has the talent of attacking and defending which is mostly the pattern that Mourinho likes his players to possess. With Jose Mourinho's years of experience as a coach, he can win the La Liga for Real Madrid and don't doubt his influence in the UCL, he can still win it.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Honestly this has to be verified as you have said if it is true or not, but that being said, anything is possible because we are at the open window for transfer and there could be many speculations about players intention in moving from one team to another.

As regards Arsenal, I don't think it is the best moment for them to be able to allow any player leave since they are somewhat along the line, their matches recently has been impressive and then they just had the best team that could possibly deliver for them even in the next season the way they perform this just concluded one.

I am not too worried about Odegaard. Because Odegaard is not a player who is impossible to replace. He played 24 matches in the Premier League in the Arsenal jersey last season. He scored only one goal and made 6 assists. So even if Odegaard leaves the squad, Arsenal will be able to find a worthy replacement. Arsenal has a lot of money.

But Odegaard will probably not leave Arsenal. That is the news I saw. Maybe it was a complete rumor. The news seems true to me.

Arsenal captain Martin Odegaard happy to stay with the Gunners amid ‘completely false’ Galatasaray transfer links

[Sarah Azhari]

Onana is being loaned to the Trabzonspor again. It's a one year loan, but i feel MU is not need him anymore. that's why they're sending him out of their club. So, i'm wondering why doesn't he just join Trabzonspor permanently? It will be much better instead of wasting his time to fight his position, which already taken by Lammens.

Actually, Manchester United wants to sell Onana permanently. However, no club is willing to buy him because his salary is so high. Even so, since Trabzonspor is only willing to loan Onana, Manchester United is grateful because that is the only viable option available to them. Onana’s career has really taken a downturn, and he seems to be struggling mentally, which has caused his performance to plummet; it appears he’s having a hard time regaining his confidence.

[Franctoshi]

Onana is being loaned to the Trabzonspor again. It's a one year loan, but i feel MU is not need him anymore. that's why they're sending him out of their club. So, i'm wondering why doesn't he just join Trabzonspor permanently? It will be much better instead of wasting his time to fight his position, which already taken by Lammens.

Actually, Manchester United wants to sell Onana permanently. However, no club is willing to buy him because his salary is so high. Even so, since Trabzonspor is only willing to loan Onana, Manchester United is grateful because that is the only viable option available to them. Onana’s career has really taken a downturn, and he seems to be struggling mentally, which has caused his performance to plummet; it appears he’s having a hard time regaining his confidence.

Why would Onana's salary be this high since his performance and rating as a keeper is decreasing rapidly and none of these clubs are interested for his service as we speak, that's not fair for a a keeper who's performance has declined.

The best Manchester is not to hesitate to loan him out to Trabzonspor, the club willing to accept him for loan.

[tottong]

Actually, Manchester United wants to sell Onana permanently. However, no club is willing to buy him because his salary is so high. Even so, since Trabzonspor is only willing to loan Onana, Manchester United is grateful because that is the only viable option available to them. Onana’s career has really taken a downturn, and he seems to be struggling mentally, which has caused his performance to plummet; it appears he’s having a hard time regaining his confidence.

This was a much better move, as Trabzonspor had previously not planned to extend the loan, but they ultimately decided to extend it.
Onana's career had suffered a significant setback, making it difficult for other teams to sign him. Furthermore, his wages were quite high, making it difficult for other clubs to afford him. Manchester United had already found the right goalkeeper, and there was little hope of Onana remaining there in the current situation.
The deal offered by Trabzonspor would allow Onana to rebuild his confidence, and next season, if he performed better, he might be interested in other clubs.

[Mayor of ogba]

I also hope this negotiation fails because I think Granit Xhaka is better off staying with Sunderland, at least he will remain captain and keep getting plenty of playing time.
Whereas if he joins Chelsea, I don't think Granit Xhaka will become an influential player, and there's even a chance he won't get regular playing time, especially since he's not that young anymore. So it's really right for Granit Xhaka to stay with Sunderland.

Remaining as captain of Sunderland won't add anything to Granit Xhaka's career right now, if Chelsea is still interested in him, he should give them a listen ears and he should beg Sunderland to allow him move to Chelsea as moving to Chelsea will give him a room to earn more than what is currently earning at Sunderland, he needs that as his professional football career will soon come to an end. Granit Xhaka suit Xabi Alonso style of play, and since Xabi Alonso is his former boss, if he moves to Chelsea he will be a regular starter as far as Xabi Alonso is the manager of Chelsea, and he doesn't need to become an influential player anymore since he's not that young anymore and doesn't have anything to prove.

[GiftedMAN]

Onana is being loaned to the Trabzonspor again. It's a one year loan, but i feel MU is not need him anymore. that's why they're sending him out of their club. So, i'm wondering why doesn't he just join Trabzonspor permanently? It will be much better instead of wasting his time to fight his position, which already taken by Lammens.

Actually, Manchester United wants to sell Onana permanently. However, no club is willing to buy him because his salary is so high. Even so, since Trabzonspor is only willing to loan Onana, Manchester United is grateful because that is the only viable option available to them. Onana’s career has really taken a downturn, and he seems to be struggling mentally, which has caused his performance to plummet; it appears he’s having a hard time regaining his confidence.

If the amount involved in Onana's salary is the reason why no club is willing to sign him then Manchester United should work with him to reduce his money or accept a pay cut so that he can have a permanent deal that would keep him in a club for years. Trabzonspor won the Turkish cup with him last season and he wasn't bad as a keeper but if the club can't afford to sign him permanently then his wages should be looked upon so that he won't be down mentally as a result of what is going on in his deal and as it has affected his future career too. Manchester United has a good keeper he should know that the team is not ready for his return again.

[free-bit.co.in]

Actually, Manchester United wants to sell Onana permanently. However, no club is willing to buy him because his salary is so high. Even so, since Trabzonspor is only willing to loan Onana, Manchester United is grateful because that is the only viable option available to them. Onana’s career has really taken a downturn, and he seems to be struggling mentally, which has caused his performance to plummet; it appears he’s having a hard time regaining his confidence.

Onana is a good goalkeeper. But Manchester United does not  need Onana now. Because in the last season, Manchester united's main goalkeeper was Senne Lammens. Lammes' performance was quite good in the last season. At the same time, Onana's wages are also very high. Manchester united probably had to pay £200,000  per week. Manchester united management has no need to pay  such a large amount for a  second goalkeeper. So United management is interested in selling Onana to reduce  costs.

[Zaguru12]

Why would Onana's salary be this high since his performance and rating as a keeper is decreasing rapidly and none of these clubs are interested for his service as we speak, that's not fair for a a keeper who's performance has declined.

The best Manchester is not to hesitate to loan him out to Trabzonspor, the club willing to accept him for loan.

Actually we need to sometimes calm down and understand some kind of things, the player in question had a contract with Manchester United long term a go when he was at his peak and that’s definitely got him the high wages so now with him not having the best of seasons again doesn’t mean that Manchester will just sit down and cut his salary low, his contract must still be honored no matter what and that’s exactly what Manchester United is doing, if you actually look at the other players like Sancho who is now a free agent and Rashford they all were on a very high wages and it’s even what’s stopping Manchester United to actually get to offload Rashford too at the moment.

The recent increase of Andre Onana’s wages was because in his in contract Manchester United united been in the champions league meant more wages for him and technical even if he is not part of the club at the moment he is still a player under contract there and definitely he is contract must be honored. Luckily for Manchester United, Trabzonspor have agree to take him on loan for the reminder of the season and also to cover his new £170k wage (this was actually £120k without champions league football). so this is a great news for Manchester United because before this loan expires he would be having just a year left at Manchester United since his contract is ti run till June 2028. Maybe in the next summer if he puts in a good performance like he did last season for Trabzonspor he could get signed.

Sadly this what bad business makes a team team look like and it’s the reason why the current Manchester United board are not going after just all signings or entering into bid wars like before

[Not your key not your BTC]

They signed Mateus Fernandes for 85 million euros, and Tottenham has also reached an agreement with Newcastle to sign Sandro Tonali for 100 million euros (92.5 million euros + a 7.5 million euro bonus). I feel like they’re rushing into deals without engaging in more rigorous negotiations. Or maybe they really wanted these two players that badly.

In my opinion, Tottenham really wants these two players because they’re currently overhauling their squad to make the team competitive next season. Besides, I’m sure Tottenham has already tried to negotiate lower transfer fees for these two players but may not have succeeded. And Tottenham might be thinking that if they don’t sign them soon, these two players will slip away from their grasp. So it’s better to secure them now rather than let another club snatch them up. That’s probably how Tottenham’s management is thinking.

[Mame89]

Onana is being loaned to the Trabzonspor again. It's a one year loan, but i feel MU is not need him anymore. that's why they're sending him out of their club. So, i'm wondering why doesn't he just join Trabzonspor permanently? It will be much better instead of wasting his time to fight his position, which already taken by Lammens.

Actually, Manchester United wants to sell Onana permanently. However, no club is willing to buy him because his salary is so high. Even so, since Trabzonspor is only willing to loan Onana, Manchester United is grateful because that is the only viable option available to them. Onana’s career has really taken a downturn, and he seems to be struggling mentally, which has caused his performance to plummet; it appears he’s having a hard time regaining his confidence.

That's right. So far no clubs have shown interest in Onana, and Trabzonspor are only willing to accept him on loan. They will cover his full salary. Several sources even say Onana will remain focused on returning to Manchester United and proving to the new manager that he deserves to be in the team plans. Onana also remains confident he has a future at United and won't give up without a fight.

However, Onana has lost his place at Manchester United, and now goalkeeper Lammens is the first choice goalkeeper under Michael Carrick, so there's no way back for him. It could be said that Onana's return to Trabzonspor for this second loan season is a strategic move for both teams. Manchester United and Onana both need a fresh start, and hopefully this decision benefits all parties.

[Nheer]

I am not too worried about Odegaard. Because Odegaard is not a player who is impossible to replace. He played 24 matches in the Premier League in the Arsenal jersey last season. He scored only one goal and made 6 assists. So even if Odegaard leaves the squad, Arsenal will be able to find a worthy replacement. Arsenal has a lot of money.

But Odegaard will probably not leave Arsenal. That is the news I saw. Maybe it was a complete rumor. The news seems true to me.

Arsenal captain Martin Odegaard happy to stay with the Gunners amid ‘completely false’ Galatasaray transfer links

Odegaard used to be an important player for Arsenal even though his contributions directly to goal/assist isn't always high he still helps them to keep the team in good shape. Recently he seems to be depreciating in performance and so his contributions has not been really helpful this past season that's why he's not hard to replace. He is not doing much currently so I also think if he leave they will definitely find a better replacement to even do better than him.

Players like that don't always want to leave easily so even if he stays the coach needs to decide if he has use for him or not. If he doesn't then he should be kept on the bench, that will influence him to change his mind about staying another season.

It's still a rumor so until the season starts I believe anything can still happen.

[Ale88]

This is another source I have found which is telling us about the potential Ødegaard to Galatasaray deal...

However the main source is a Turkish journalist and he is a Galatasaray fan according to his X profile. Therefore I'm not sure how trusted he would be.  

If this deal happens, the Turkish side will gain lots of power. However why would Arsenal like to let him go now?

In football everything is possible but I call this total BS. Ødegaard is Arsenal's captain, he is only 27 years old, he plays in the best league in the world, why on earth would he want to move to Galatasaray now? And don't get me wrong, Galatasaray improved a lot over the years, they managed to bring a lot of great players, but I really don't see Ødegaard playing in the Turkish league, especially now that Arsenal are better than ever.

[Princess Leah]

Onana is being loaned to the Trabzonspor again. It's a one year loan, but i feel MU is not need him anymore. that's why they're sending him out of their club. So, i'm wondering why doesn't he just join Trabzonspor permanently? It will be much better instead of wasting his time to fight his position, which already taken by Lammens.

Actually, Manchester United wants to sell Onana permanently. However, no club is willing to buy him because his salary is so high. Even so, since Trabzonspor is only willing to loan Onana, Manchester United is grateful because that is the only viable option available to them. Onana’s career has really taken a downturn, and he seems to be struggling mentally, which has caused his performance to plummet; it appears he’s having a hard time regaining his confidence.

That's right. So far no clubs have shown interest in Onana, and Trabzonspor are only willing to accept him on loan. They will cover his full salary. Several sources even say Onana will remain focused on returning to Manchester United and proving to the new manager that he deserves to be in the team plans. Onana also remains confident he has a future at United and won't give up without a fight.

However, Onana has lost his place at Manchester United, and now goalkeeper Lammens is the first choice goalkeeper under Michael Carrick, so there's no way back for him. It could be said that Onana's return to Trabzonspor for this second loan season is a strategic move for both teams. Manchester United and Onana both need a fresh start, and hopefully this decision benefits all parties.

I don't think Trabzonspor fully trust him, he had a fairly good season with them which is  enough to sign him permanently but they choose to go on another loan even when they knew that Manchester United would gladly sell him to them if they want permanent Trabzonspor, I'm not even sure if these current deal involves an obligation to buy permanently, does it?

 If Onana was good, Carrick or the board would've called him back to compete with Senne Lammens for first choice position but it seems United's board are not impressed with last season's performance with Trabzonspor that's why they don't mind sending him on another loan to the club.

[wakier]

Havertz will definitely remain assigned as a targetman but for next season Arsenal's focus will definitely remain on Gyokeres first but indeed his winger is a little problematic.

I feel like Kai Havertz is still less problematic than Gyokeres especially we have come to know is capability and still he is crucial for Gunners while Gyokeres hasn't gotten up to expectation since his arrival, another season to prove himself or I suggest Gunners start looking for a more reliable alternative for the number one striking role.

Kai Havertz is indeed a good player but Arsenal prioritizes Gyokeres performance this season and rarely uses him so I think Arsenal no longer prioritizes him in the team, yes he will still be used by Arteta but only in certain matches next season maybe he will sit on the bench more, maybe the reason is because he is often injured which will definitely affect his performance Arsenal needs more productive players to strengthen their performance next season.

[Woodie]

Onana is being loaned to the Trabzonspor again. It's a one year loan, but i feel MU is not need him anymore. that's why they're sending him out of their club. So, i'm wondering why doesn't he just join Trabzonspor permanently? It will be much better instead of wasting his time to fight his position, which already taken by Lammens.
It's such a weird decision he's still hoping to be the main goalie of MU while his club doesn't even need him.

He can also pick an alternative choice by looking for a new decent club to play with. I think this is much better instead of waiting and waiting. He has given chances by his club, but he's unable to prove it. The better he leaves from there.

These long term signings are proving to be biting them in the a*** , hope going forward they get smarter to avoid paying unnecessary wages for players that aren't even playing for the club... maybe a performance based contract is what should be inked, if you don't perform or aren't playing your pay grade drops to a certain threshold.

Otherwise for Onana it's end of the line for him, he better find a club that can sign him on a permanent basis.

[len01]

If Onana was good, Carrick or the board would've called him back to compete with Senne Lammens for first choice position but it seems United's board are not impressed with last season's performance with Trabzonspor that's why they don't mind sending him on another loan to the club.

Everyone involved in running Man United knows exactly how Onana has performed for the club. He has had some really good games, but most of the time his performances have been disappointing. His reflexes aren't particularly strong, and he tends to make costly mistakes. Lammens, on the other hand, has excellent reflexes in all kinds of situations. The difference is pretty clear, and it shows that United need a goalkeeper with greater reliability who can consistently perform under any circumstances.

[MAAManda]

This is another source I have found which is telling us about the potential Ødegaard to Galatasaray deal...

However the main source is a Turkish journalist and he is a Galatasaray fan according to his X profile. Therefore I'm not sure how trusted he would be.  

If this deal happens, the Turkish side will gain lots of power. However why would Arsenal like to let him go now?

I actually didn't want to believe this, but since Galatasaray has finalized the personal terms, I have no choice but to believe it. Odegaard still has a long time remaining on his contract at Arsenal, running until the summer of 2028. So, I wouldn't expect him to want to move to a league with a lower level of competition. Well, his career is in his own hands; he knows what's best for himself.

[Amphenomenon]

-Image Edited Out-

This is another source I have found which is telling us about the potential Ødegaard to Galatasaray deal...

However the main source is a Turkish journalist and he is a Galatasaray fan according to his X profile. Therefore I'm not sure how trusted he would be.  

If this deal happens, the Turkish side will gain lots of power. However why would Arsenal like to let him go now?

Honestly this has to be verified as you have said if it is true or not, but that being said, anything is possible because we are at the open window for transfer and there could be many speculations about players intention in moving from one team to another.

As regards Arsenal, I don't think it is the best moment for them to be able to allow any player leave since they are somewhat along the line, their matches recently has been impressive and then they just had the best team that could possibly deliver for them even in the next season the way they perform this just concluded one.

It's too hard to see any truth from this news. It's one thing to see a news about Odegaard leaving Arsenal and it's another thing for it to be Galatasaray.

Arsenal are not ready to let their captain go neither will Odegaard be interested in Galatasaray while he still have much to win with Gunners, especially after looking back to how he came to become an Arsenal player.

I would rather say this is a false news.