Why is russia the only country (regime) supporting dprk at the un?

[bryant.coleman]

Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.

To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.

Russia does not want to seem like a world power, and it is a strong world power led by a powerful ruler. And it really annoys everyone, but they can not do anything.

Russia is still a shadow of its former self. If you compare Russia as of now and the USSR of the early 1980s, then it is clear. The USSR had a population of close to 300 million, and their armed forces were as powerful as that of the United States. Now if you look at Russia, it is having a population of only around 145 million, and the armed forces are clearly inferior to that of the Americans. That said, their resurgence after 1999, when Putin took over has been nothing short of a miracle.

[Forester618]

Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.

To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.

Russia does not want to seem like a world power, and it is a strong world power led by a powerful ruler. And it really annoys everyone, but they can not do anything.

Russia is still a shadow of its former self. If you compare Russia as of now and the USSR of the early 1980s, then it is clear. The USSR had a population of close to 300 million, and their armed forces were as powerful as that of the United States. Now if you look at Russia, it is having a population of only around 145 million, and the armed forces are clearly inferior to that of the Americans. That said, their resurgence after 1999, when Putin took over has been nothing short of a miracle.

Under Putin, Russia has become even worse than it was. How would Putin's propaganda did not shout about their successes really demonstrate to them no one can. Russian during this time quarreled with almost all its neighbours. Now is a potential enemy. Modern Russian weapons too, on their own can not do, and components abroad can not buy because they are under sanctions.

[Malsetid]

Russia wants to appear to be a world power, though I've no fucking idea why as it's a pointless and wasteful role.

To do that I suppose they decide to prop up the cheapest options out there with the most to gain from being given a hand job by them. And it annoys everyone else.

Russia does not want to seem like a world power, and it is a strong world power led by a powerful ruler. And it really annoys everyone, but they can not do anything.

Russia is still a shadow of its former self. If you compare Russia as of now and the USSR of the early 1980s, then it is clear. The USSR had a population of close to 300 million, and their armed forces were as powerful as that of the United States. Now if you look at Russia, it is having a population of only around 145 million, and the armed forces are clearly inferior to that of the Americans. That said, their resurgence after 1999, when Putin took over has been nothing short of a miracle.

Under Putin, Russia has become even worse than it was. How would Putin's propaganda did not shout about their successes really demonstrate to them no one can. Russian during this time quarreled with almost all its neighbours. Now is a potential enemy. Modern Russian weapons too, on their own can not do, and components abroad can not buy because they are under sanctions.

Well that could also be because there are a lot of international rules now that putin choosesnto follow compared to before. I think it's safe for us that russia isn't as powerful as back then but still they have a very good capability of causing damage to any nation. Though i don't think putin would be that dumb to initiate any conflicts that he knows may very well destroy his people

[TheCoinGrabber]

And today Russia has no American troops on its border? The Russians themselves are to blame. Not only do they attack their neighbors, but also constantly provoke the West. For this reason, it turns out everything is just the opposite.

Russia has American troops on its borders, especially in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. But Russia has not invaded any of these nations. And regarding Ukraine, there was no Russian invasion. There is an ongoing civil war between the Westerners and the Easterners, and Russia is not directly involved.

Might be the reason they're not invading? And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

[Alexzap]

And today Russia has no American troops on its border? The Russians themselves are to blame. Not only do they attack their neighbors, but also constantly provoke the West. For this reason, it turns out everything is just the opposite.

Russia has American troops on its borders, especially in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. But Russia has not invaded any of these nations. And regarding Ukraine, there was no Russian invasion. There is an ongoing civil war between the Westerners and the Easterners, and Russia is not directly involved.

LOL! Precisely Russia and the war in those countries. Who fought in Georgia? About the purchase of weapons and tanks in stores Putin laugh the whole world. You have outdated techniques. Already Putin himself acknowledged that Russian troops were involved in the seizure of Crimea. In Ukraine there is no civil war, and Russian will answer for it as answered Hitler's Germany.

[Sithara007]

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

[Marcus_2017]

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic?

[TheCoinGrabber]

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

I don't remember any voting to secede taking place. All I remember is there was a "coup" which installed a pro-EU president. Before anyone can say cheese, bam, you already have heavily-armed, pro-Russia "rebels" in Crimea. Then you have Russian forces in, taking control of the place.

Also, aren't Russians not the true natives there? I believe Empress Catherine expelled the Tatars when Russia first annexed Crimea.

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic?

Maybe because they're not ethnic Russians? Ethnic Russians in former Soviet states outside Russia are valuable because it gives Kremlin a "just" reason to interfere in their behalf.

[Lancusters]

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

I don't remember any voting to secede taking place. All I remember is there was a "coup" which installed a pro-EU president. Before anyone can say cheese, bam, you already have heavily-armed, pro-Russia "rebels" in Crimea. Then you have Russian forces in, taking control of the place.

Also, aren't Russians not the true natives there? I believe Empress Catherine expelled the Tatars when Russia first annexed Crimea.

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic?

Maybe because they're not ethnic Russians? Ethnic Russians in former Soviet states outside Russia are valuable because it gives Kremlin a "just" reason to interfere in their behalf.

Will not be ethnic Russians there are other reasons. Do you remember how the Russians provoked Georgia? Just Russian President provocateur and his dream to restore the Soviet Union. Too bad that the West did ttot do not understand and very little response to it.

[Sithara007]

The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic?

Before the disintegration of the USSR, around one-third of the population of Chechenya was Christian and white. These people lived in the districts of Shelkovskoy and Naursky. These two districts were actually Terek Cossack homeland, but gifted to Chechenya by the Soviets (just like they gifted Crimea to Ukraine). Also, the lowland Chechens were pro-Russia and they never supported the independence movement. Less than one-third of the Chechens wanted to secede from Russia. In Crimea, more than 90% of the population wanted to be part of Russia.

[Mirconome]

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic?

It is only the world government that can not recognize the annexation of the Crimea, because it is not profitable for them. Most of the population of Crimea and even some Ukrainians consider themselves Russians and speak Russian.

[Barrymore]

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic?

It is only the world government that can not recognize the annexation of the Crimea, because it is not profitable for them. Most of the population of Crimea and even some Ukrainians consider themselves Russians and speak Russian.

You confuse the question of nationality and the state. Everyone knows that in Brighton most live Russian. Imagine if the Russians take over all police stations and hold a fake referendum on the accession Brighton beach to Russia. Think about it.

[TheCoinGrabber]

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

I don't remember any voting to secede taking place. All I remember is there was a "coup" which installed a pro-EU president. Before anyone can say cheese, bam, you already have heavily-armed, pro-Russia "rebels" in Crimea. Then you have Russian forces in, taking control of the place.

Also, aren't Russians not the true natives there? I believe Empress Catherine expelled the Tatars when Russia first annexed Crimea.

And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?

Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation.

The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic?

Maybe because they're not ethnic Russians? Ethnic Russians in former Soviet states outside Russia are valuable because it gives Kremlin a "just" reason to interfere in their behalf.

Will not be ethnic Russians there are other reasons. Do you remember how the Russians provoked Georgia? Just Russian President provocateur and his dream to restore the Soviet Union. Too bad that the West did ttot do not understand and very little response to it.

Seems everyone have imperialistic dreams these days.

[giantdragon]

Everyone knows that in Brighton most live Russian. Imagine if the Russians take over all police stations and hold a fake referendum on the accession Brighton beach to Russia. Think about it.

Why not?! Putin can secretly send "green men" here, equipped with portable small-range missiles with nuclear warheads. Most likely Trump will agree to give away Brighton district and to save whole US.

[Lancusters]

Everyone knows that in Brighton most live Russian. Imagine if the Russians take over all police stations and hold a fake referendum on the accession Brighton beach to Russia. Think about it.

Why not?! Putin can secretly send "green men" here, equipped with portable small-range missiles with nuclear warheads. Most likely Trump will agree to give away Brighton district and to save whole US.

Do you think "little green men" will have a chance to return home alive? Lol! They will destroy themselves Russians who live in Brighton. They once lived in Russia and know how bad this country is. They are not in vain, he fled to America.

[Sex Video Chat VKcams.com]

Russians who live in Brighton

There is a Jew Gangs of Brighton Beach Territory.
Monya Elson,  Boris Nayfeld



The Russian there is only the Language.



http://gangstersinc.ning.com/profiles/blogs/russian-mob-crew-in-brighton-beach-busted-by-dea-irs

People of Brighton "lived in Russia and know how bad this country is"

[Instamined]

For the lols

[Sithara007]

Everyone knows that in Brighton most live Russian. Imagine if the Russians take over all police stations and hold a fake referendum on the accession Brighton beach to Russia. Think about it.

Why not?! Putin can secretly send "green men" here, equipped with portable small-range missiles with nuclear warheads. Most likely Trump will agree to give away Brighton district and to save whole US.

The United States of America is going to disintegrate very soon, as a result of warfare. Trump will start a war with the North Korea, and it will destroy the American economy. Another war with Iran will result in the US breaking up in to smaller nations. Once that happens, Putin can send his green men to Alaska.

[Instamined]

The United States of America is going to disintegrate very soon, as a result of warfare. Trump will start a war with the North Korea, and it will destroy the American economy. Another war with Iran will result in the US breaking up in to smaller nations. Once that happens, Putin can send his green men to Alaska.

lol, yeah right, the United States will be a 50 state union until the day you die.

The second a state came remotely close to actual secession they would be invaded and squelched by any means necessary.

[joebrook]

The americans dont seem to learn from their mistakes and a fool who never learns is destined to repeat the same mistake over and over again. They started with Afghanistan against the Russians and they are still doing it, when you install a puppet regime they are bound to rebel at some point in time.